• DPMP

    There is no comment that can fully embrace the stupidity of this action by OUR justice system.

    • disqus_7EcB0kPDrU

      Only that we can’t call it a “Justice” system

      • marshmil1789

        It is injustice. Instead of *EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW* it is ~~UNEQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAWLESSNESS~~. A baby aborted does not get a trial by an impartial jury of its peers (fellow Americans).

        • RC

          You made some very good points. Being a man, I really don’t know all that much about abortion other than to think it’s wrong in most cases. Personally I feel the issue should be put to the vote nationwide with women who are living in this country legally making that decision.

          • marshmil1789

            RC that should be a nationwide referendum allowing ONLY bona fide US Citizens to cast votes and men as well as women voting. Abortion is immoral in all cases where the presence of a fetus does not endanger the Mother’s life.

      • Consuelo

        Google is paying 97$ per hour,with weekly payouts.You can also avail this.
        On tuesday I got a great New Land Rover Range Rover from having earned $11752 this last four weeks..with-out any doubt it’s the most-comfortable job I have ever done .. It sounds unbelievable but you wont forgive yourself if you don’t check it
        da14d:
        ➽➽
        ➽➽;➽➽ http://GoogleNewNetJobsGlobalOpportunities/earn/hourly ★✫★★✫★✫★★✫★✫★★✫★✫★★✫★✫★★✫★✫★★✫★✫★★✫★✫★★✫★✫★★✫★✫★★✫★✫:::::!da144luu

    • Matlonc

      Speaking of stupid allysa milano said its a war on children if we dont let illegal children kill unborn children? Dont know bout you but that comment makes me mildly nauseous….thanks crooked comey

      • kassa1

        Yeah and that’s the stupid little bitch always up there defending the rights of animals can you imagine that!?

        • Matlonc

          yes I can- the hypocrisy and ignorance of the left- defend the animals, let the unborn human be murdered. Rail against the death penalty for murderers and allow a doctor to suck a fetus out of a uterus and kill it. Sorry for the visual but even that does not bother the left. Who are the animals again? Not sure if you are a male or female but could you imagine the small talk on a date with her? Ugh, id stick a gun in my mouth !!

          • kassa1

            People like her or no different than the Nazis and the way they did the Jews no difference whatsoever.

          • RufusVonDufus

            Nope, her mouth!

        • rfrichey

          She is an animal! I would say a bitch dog, bur bitch dogs have a use in this world and Alyssa or what ever her name is doesn’t. She is useless to society and a waste of oxygen, food and water.

      • RufusVonDufus

        Milano is/was/always will be a Mimoron who thinks we value her ridiculous opinions.

    • marshmil1789

      DPMP this is not a part of my justice system. It comes from everything anti-American. Some people have reverted to the worship of Baal, the “god” to which babies were sacrificed around 2600 years ago. The idea being, “Sacrifice the baby–getting rid of the ‘problem’–then conscience is cleared.”. “Thou shalt not murder.”–original Hebrew.

  • TrueAmerican

    an ILLEGAL has NO, ZERO rights under the US Constitution. the Left has NO clue what the word ILLEGAL means and has Zero knowledge of the US Constitution. except that the second Amendment is wrong in their eyes.

    • jimmy midnight

      The Constitution, adopted in a moment when slavery was understood 2 B driving America’s burgeoning economic growth, yet no one wanted 2 say so out loud, is one thing. America’s future, in which the “Civil War Amendments” R fully realized, will B a quite different thing. This is what USA! with equal legal protection firmly in place, actually looks like. “Love it or leave it!” 🙂

      • WOA

        Could you PLEASE edit this mishmash to make it readable? I’ve tried several times and I cannot even determine your position on this discussion. Thank you.

        • jimmy midnight

          What I’m satin’–the vilified (unsurprisingly woman) judge ruled correctly in this case, ‘cuz equal protection.

          • floral

            No non citizen has any rights, esp not equal protection.

          • jimmy midnight

            That]s YOUR opinion, which lacks both sympathy and nuance.

          • floral

            No, it is written in the Constitution and “nuance” and “”sympathy” are irrelevant “opinion” and have nothing to do with Constitutional RIGHTS and responsibilities.

          • floral

            That is YOUR opinion, which lacks legal basis, logic, and rationality.

          • EL

            Even less…..equal protection paid for by us.

        • marshmil1789

          WOA thank you. I couldn’t unravel it either. Was like chopped up sentences with no connection.

      • John D

        Keep it up and you may be leaving feet first

        • jimmy midnight

          Idle threats R a pleasant Sunday afternoon entertainment. Let’s drink a toast 2 ’em soon!

      • J_in_TX

        Which “Civil War Amendment” are you referencing? Inquiring minds want to know.

      • Anne Weber

        I am disturbed by your statement Jimmy Midnight, here is why. The Constitution, adopted at a time when, like today the reality still in African countries, slavery is alive and well. America had this heinous practice that had been handed down and some Americans did do this, and other Americans stopped it. NAMELY Republicans! FACT: Not ONE REPUBLICAN owned slaves. I dare you to find one. There isn’t ANY! When Abraham Lincoln saw the sale of a family, who was separated, he was so sickened that he vowed in his heart to do everything in his power to stop that evil practice. He went through incredible hardship to finally make it to become President to have the honor of passing legislation ending slavery. It is also a fact that Egyptians kept the Jewish people enslaved for hundreds of years in history, It might be helpful to get your history correct.
        FACT: Past or present – Some people do evil things and other people don’t. That is the same today. FACT: As a nation, we offer the most freedom, opportunity and hope for all races on the planet. Yes, we are not perfect, because we are a Nation of humans. Humans who have the ability to make errors in judgement. That is why we are also a nation of laws. When we don’t follow those laws or choose only to follow the ones that we “like” then we have no justification to use those laws to accuse others of their actions. If we are guilty of breaking these same laws, then we cannot expect that they will protect us. Either we are a nation of laws and being a citizen means something, or we are a nation of anarchy where laws have no meaning and nationality has no status.
        This would mean that the lives of the men and women who have died and are now defending our freedoms and the life that we enjoy here in this country are dying in vain for a country that does not respect their sacrifice. Justice for one, is justice for all or it isn’t justice. Your premise is flawed and I for one am not about to sit back and allow the ridiculous notion that non-citizens should have the right to demand that we as a nation bow to their wants over those of our citizens and against our laws.
        I would like to say that I am a legal immigrant to this amazing country. It took my husband and I, nine years and $11K to get our citizenship. We had to leave this country and return in order to get our visa renewed, then get our greencards, then not be allowed to leave the country for over one year, not even for my grandmother’s funeral, which was very hard, so we were unable to leave the USA. BUT we did not demonstrate, or go on TV or claim victimhood, we did not get ANY social services or government money, we worked HARD and became LEGAL CITIZENS. We love America. We are PROUD to be Americans and it is deeply OFFENSIVE to us that people who are here illegally are demanding rights that we legally went through all the hoops, paid large amounts of money, often scraping together everything we made to make sure we did it right, took 9 years, to have the right to be here. And others are just milking off the system. THAT is criminal to us and a slap in the fact to every legal immigrant.

    • marshmil1789

      True to Liberals the entire US Constitution is wrong. It violates their whimsical wishes.

    • Skip Moreland

      That isn’t true, except for certain citizen rights like voting, non-citizens have equal rights when they are in this country.

      Representative John Bingham, one of the principal framers of the amendment, emphasized that one of the purposes of the amendment was to ensure “that all persons, whether citizens or strangers, within this land, shall have equal protection in every State in this Union in the rights of life and liberty and property.” While the framers were especially concerned with ending discrimination against African-Americans, they also sought to curb growing state discrimination against immigrants.

      • TrueAmerican

        Ummm NO they do NOT have the same rights as US CITIZENS. if they did then we would have NO need for a Sovereign country. they have Humanitarian rights and that is it. your LIBERAL playbook doesn’t explain that to you.

      • floral

        That is an erroneous interpretation, not shared by constitutional scholars, esp Chief Justice Story. It IS the bogus interpretation set forth by the “lgbtqi community”.
        It has NOthING to do with immigration, which is the exclusive province of the Feds/Congress. NOT state discrimination against “immigrants” but citizens who moved freely from state to state and the states were not uniform in laws. Even if it was directed against foreign to the US “immigrants”, that does not include gays, foreign or domestic, and was for the purpose to assert the Constitutional power given to Congress to make uniform the naturalization process.
        James Madison said it true, that our borders were open ONLY TO the worthy part of the humans who accepted and adopted our values an the principles (liberty justice and equality)set forth in the Dec of Independence and codified in the Constitution, who could contribute to the wealth and growth of our republic.
        No one who owes allegiance to foreign powers can become citizens. All illegal entry is prohibited in the Constitution. Illegals have NO rights or protections.

  • downs1

    May the Lord deal with this foolish circuit court judge Tanya Chutkan severely! Her obvious intellectual dishonesty bias political and ignorance of the Constitution is absolutely unbelievable! She does not represent this nation!

    • jimmy midnight

      Nice God U worship–who’s projected 2 deal harshly with simply foolish people. Careful what U wish 4. No Human is exempt from foolishness, something your post highlights ever so effectively.

      • Lajos Markos

        you are also a fool like very one else a fool what part of illegal do don’t get look up the meaning illegal
        fool how you enjoy paying the medical bill for her

      • marshmil1789

        The God of Jews and Christians has the final word at His Last Judgement. None of us humans has any say, wishes or whatever. “Foolishness” under Judeo-Christian teaching means atheism–the disbelief that a Creator exists. To each his/her own.
        According to the Writings, all those into “foolishness” will get a very harsh sentence.
        If it turns out I am wrong, I’ve lost nothing. If it turns out atheists are wrong they have lost an Eternity of Perfect Happiness and Joy. Common sense and rationality say it is better to er on the safe side. But to each his/her own. Pretend you’re at McDonald’s and “Have it your way?.

        • niknar

          That is a clever hook to get people to commit to Christianity, & is why many people do when in desperate straits, especially on death row. That is why one’s conduct while here on Earth has become subordinate to one’s belief, according to certain major religions, like most (but not all) Christian sects. But I find this as an easy way out of being responsible for one’s actions.

          Now here’s a similar, but more meaningful, line of reasoning regarding an issue that many on the right reject: anthropogenic climate disruption. Logic says that due to the overwhelming consensus of climate scientists affirming that this is real (something like 99% by now), that not taking action to mitigate it could very well mean the end of life on Earth, & in any case would cost much more in the long run than addressing it now & in a big way, & that so many other benefits would accrue from acting (longer & healthier lives, less pollution, fewer poisons, more natural areas remaining, more species remaining, more edible fish in the sea, more resources remaining, more & healthier produce, more walkable areas, more convenient transportation available, more potable water, cleaner air, fewer diseases, etc.), we should urgently & massively bring all science, government & enterprise together to work on preventing this potentially catastrophic phenomenon from happening. To act would be to substantially reduce the disastrous effects of climate chaos & thus is obviously the safe & prudent course to take, whereas to not act would nearly ensure that considerable destruction that could well be the end of our species (& most other species on Earth, which is obviously the dangerous & reckless course to take. The choice should be clear, yet many people are willing to risk the death of our species in order for a few executives of a few giant corporations to get even richer (in the short term only) than they already are now, with no benefit at all, in fact extreme harm, to the rest of the country & world.

          • Do as I say, not as I do

            Thats funny, cuz I just read a scientific journal that says exactly the opposite. So we are at a stalemate. You do it your way and ill do it my way.

          • niknar

            Your sense of humor is quite well-developed, at least as far as quips go. Let’s see if your capacity for reasoning is anywhere near as strong.

            If you are faced with these 4 outcomes:

            1) the scientific community is right & we take the necessary measures to alleviate climate change: it could be expensive in the short run, but we would safely overcome the challenges with minimal climate & environmental disruption, and the overall financial benefits compared to doing nothing are likely to be very positive in the long run. The money we put up front will have been an excellent investment.

            2) The scientific community is wrong but we take those measures, anyway: it would be expensive, but there’d be many other benefits we’d gain: much less pollution, we’d continue to have a diverse flora & fauna, we’d still have most of our resources, we’d be much healthier, we’d likely have a healthier employment situation, a less uneven wealth distribution, etc., & we’d gain new economic opportunity & advantages in the long run through innovation. Again, an excellent investment.

            3) The scientific community is wrong & we don’t take those measures: we’d save some money in the short run, but our resources would be greatly depleted & therefore much more expensive; disputes over water & other resources would likely get steadily more frequent & violent, we’d have pollution of all kinds, our oceans would be dying (they already are), there’d be catastrophic extinction of plants & animals (already we’re experiencing one of the greatest mass extinctions in the history of this Earth due mainly to human activities), our overall health would likely decline, etc.

            4) The scientific community is right but we do nothing: then even more calamitous extinction; huge displacement of human populations; widespread conflict over our remaining resources, including water; widespread & uncontrollable disease; increasing crop failure; intolerable weather; gigantic destructive storms; possible extinction of the human species.

            So what is the best outcome? Actually, it’s #2: scientists are wrong but we take preventive measures – the response coal companies & other climate deniers are telling us not to take! We would’ve put some money upfront, but the side benefits would be well worth it & we wouldn’t’ve had to go through some of the worsening effects of climate change that we feared were impending. #1 would be the 2nd best outcome, because although we go through some tough times weathering through some of the effects of climate change that appear sure to come no matter what we do, we will have survived & overcome our greatest world climate threat we’ve ever faced. Even though it seems to be the industrialists’ dream, #3 comes out a poor 3rd, because although we wouldn’t face the climate challenges (beyond the normal cycles we’ve always faced), we’d still be a much worse place due to widespread pollution, resource depletion, wildlife extinction, etc., which would eventually take us down, anyway, even without being pushed on by climate change. Of course, #4 would be the worst. Conclusion: we must take the (now urgent & dramatic) measures necessary to combat climate change & environmental degradation, whether 97%+ of the scientists are correct, or certain powerful, superwealthy fossil fuel & chemical industries & their political sycophants are correct. No matter which side is right, taking these measures is clearly the prudent course to take. The longer we wait, the more expensive it will be and the more we will suffer. In fact, we are already suffering.

            Even if these outcomes were considered to have equal possibility (they’re not: the probabilities overwhelmingly favor #1 or #4, depending on our action or inaction), and even if you didn’t care about maintaining animal & plant diversity, a pleasant environment, clean air, clean water, your own personal health & longevity to say nothing about other people’s (because if you were this way, you wouldn’t care about other people), but only about getting rich, any reasonable businessman, in order to insure himself from the worst consequences, which would be so dire that the differences among the other outcomes become trivial, would choose to take appropriate measures to tackle this possible climate change challenge.

            Much more prudent would be to take measures to prevent or alleviate these disastrous changes, like becoming much more energy efficient, converting to clean, renewable energy, conserving more, paying for greenhouse emissions, consuming less, reducing intake of meat, avoiding plastic, expanding mass transit, avoiding driving cars, abandoning industrial farming for regenerative organic farming, reforesting our lands, reducing chemical spills & agricultural runoff, reducing the amount of land paved in concrete & asphalt…, & instituting pricing on greenhouse gases (such as the carbon fee + dividend proposed by CCL https://citizensclimatelobby.org/remi-report/ ) is a first step toward accomplishing these goals. All these things would help forestall climate change, have many other benefits to the environment, people’s health & the economy, & aren’t hard to do, other than getting past the well-funded industries trying to block such measures. It’s a far better way than suffering through ever greater environmental & economic disasters, wishing & hoping that technology will come up with something to protect us. And it’s our moral imperative to do so.

          • floral

            Ridiculous. Fallacious “logic”. Your “opinion is not logic, nor rational nor factual.

          • niknar

            That’s the risk of presenting a logical argument in front of an audience of people who can’t or won’t think logically. And that is why we’re a nation in decline unable or unwilling to confront the major crises we face today, the one I mentioned above being among the most grave & consequential we’ve ever faced.

            At least there exist some of us still looking for solutions to these problems & trying to persuade others to join us, because it’s the only thing we can do as American citizens with a conscience, but when there are so many people who refuse to see & are willing to give up the environment, potable water, clean air, their health, their future, all in order to feed the insatiable greed of a few extremely rich corporate executives in the fossil fuels industry, it begins to look like a hopeless cause.

          • floral

            Your comments are specious and rife with logical fallacies. Assumer thy name is niknar

          • niknar

            …says someone who clearly lacks the ability for reasoning beyond the simplest of concepts.

            If you were able to refute my logic, you would do so to each point you disagree with, & shoot them down one by one. But you didn’t because you can’t.

          • floral

            I would but you made NO valid or factual points, just employed circular reasoning, ad hominems, excluded middle among a very few fallious coments.

          • niknar

            You just demonstrated again your lack of ability to understand logical arguments, let alone devise one of your own. You merely spew out terms you don’t even understand. And what does “excluded middle among a very few fallious coments” even mean even after you correct the obvious grammatical & spelling errors?

          • floral

            I do understand logic, and all the terms I laid out. You have no legs to stand on, as you cannot and do not respond to the facts nor even conclusions I drew, except with ad hominems.
            Be specific about “obvious grammatical & spelling errors”. I use voice recognition and try to correct resulting mistakes. Among my many degrees is one in English grammar. If there is a “mistake”, it was deliberate, or you are wrong.
            Methinks the man? doth protest too much, and lacks facts to cover his specious opinions and lack of logic.

          • niknar

            You are a hoot! With the evidence out there for all to see about your incoherent, grammatically incorrect false claims & misspellings, you want to tell everybody that you had a degree in English Grammar. If that is true, you’d better demand your money back from whatever kindergarten gave it to you because it’s clearly meaningless.

          • floral

            More ad hominems. You cannot identify a single instance of grammatical error.
            The false claims are yours and any misspellings may be typos or voice recognition errors.
            You cannot justify abortion as a constitutional right, a law passed by Congress. You cannot justify abortion on the specious and illogical and unsupportable by statistics or facts on your imagination that a child not aborted is unwanted and therefore a potential mass murderer (or criminal as you changed it to). Nothing is 100% and your claim stated as not just probability but more likely than not (even the stats for criminal behavior don’t arise to more than 10% of the population in any age group, income groups and social or ethnic groupings, though the “fatherless” and/or single parent households have a tendency towards greater anti social behavior and emotional problems, but it is not a majority of same). You have not a leg to stand on, logically, statistically or factually, to support your outlandish claims about abortion, criminality, mass murder, “choice”.

          • niknar

            Your shrill hyperbole is duly noted.

          • floral

            You are so transparently ridiculously illogical. You are clearly devolving. When you can come up with statistics that proves that abortions prevent mass murderers and crime (which is increasing, btw, and is generally seen as the result of the loss of the 2 parent family and the increase in welfare for ever more children born to unwed mothers ON welfare and uneducated mothers, even by sociologists who seem to be primarily lib/dem/progs) maybe I will engage with your nonsense. Signing off and blocking you.

          • niknar

            “Signing off and blocking you.”

            Ahhh, finally some relief!

          • floral

            apparently not, since you keep replying with irrelevant nonsense. I thought I blocked you and it says you are blocked when I view in discussion, so how do you get to be an ASSumer continually?

          • niknar

            Something else you’re incompetent at: blocking people.

        • jimmy midnight

          WHAT silly stuff. WHO told U that? WHY did U believe them?

          • marshmil1789

            jimmy we do not expect you and your atheist buddies to believe anything we “Believers” say. Carry on with your own preferences. Like at McDonald’s “Have it your way”. Enjoy your self-made lunch. We are invited to a Celestial Banquet. MAGA!

          • floral

            Why don’t YOU believe? There is far more reason to believe in Jehovah and His Word of the Bible, than to accept anything you say. You have no logic, reason, rationale, intelligence, education apparent.

      • John D

        Moron. Your post highlights your own ignorance.

    • radiodickII

      She doesn’t represent the law, politics only.

  • cathy floyd

    If she wants to murder her unborn child,let her,but don’t do it at American taxpayers expense,let her pay for it herself!

    • marshmil1789

      Oh she’ll pay for it alright. At the Highest of High Courts–The Last Judgement. “Thou shalt not murder.”

      • carpkiller

        I do not want my money to go for an illegal anything,especially an abortion. They screw to get pregnant thinking thats going to keep them here Then they want an abortion to get rid of the resonsiability.

      • Frank B.

        Did you say that when that fucking nazi murdered Heather in Virginia, this past summer? NO YOU DIDN’T. Because you bastards are just a bunch of fucking hypocrites.

        • Do as I say, not as I do

          Sieg Hiel

          • niknar

            “Heil”

          • Frank B.

            Retort: Die Mother Fucker!

      • Do as I say, not as I do

        Franky don’t believe in God, so your whistling Dixie. I love Dixie. Don’t you Franky? I love to drape that flag over the little Hispanic girl while she’s murdering her child. Hey. Maybe it was gonna be named Franky.

        • marshmil1789

          You seem to have responded to the wrong person. I think you meant to reply to Frank B. who is blocked from my screen. Your post makes no sense. Sorry.

    • floral

      No send her with her family back whence they came. A non citizen, illegally, here, does NOT get “rights” under OUR Constitution

    • Skip Moreland

      She is paying for it herself.

      • Do as I say, not as I do

        What, with her foodstamp card? That don’t count.

  • MILES E DRAKE

    This is further confirmation that the long-term plan of the left is for abortion to replace Communion or The Lord’s Prayer or the sounding of the shofar as the chief religious ritual in our society, as part of the supplantation of Christianity and Judaism by a state cult of secular humanism, gaian paganism and ruler worship along the lines of ancient Rome. We know where that got the Romans, and we are headed there faster than they are. Becoming the free abortion clinic of the Americas will also accelerate the invasion and transformation of our republic, and an open-border peoples republic of Aztlan, ruled by a permanent oligarchy of cultural marxists through the votes of a new brown Third World population, is also part of the left’s plan.

  • DJA Lindsey

    No one ever seems to mention the father in these things. I know here has to be one, so why isn’t he made to step up and take responsible for his actions instead of us having to pay for the wiping out of an innocent child. And why isn’t she (and family ) sent back to where she came from?

    • Frank B.

      Why would that be relevant at this point?

      • CQ

        Frank, you don’t seem to understand basic morality.

        • Frank B.

          We are at the point where this girl requires medical attention. Not your bull shit moralizing about who impregnated her! Now grow the fuck up.

          • Charles

            No! You are wrong. There is a good chance if she were in her home country, her “medical attention” would be found at her house or someone else’s house with a midwife.

          • Frank B.

            But she ain’t in her “home country”. She’s right here in the United States! That’s the whole god damn point you fucking moron.

          • Do as I say, not as I do

            Got quite the potty mouth, eh Franky?

          • Frank B.

            “sieg hiel” — is just about the dirtiest “potty mouth” there is, bitch!

          • Paul Allen

            The whole point is that she should NOT be here. We should not be forced to allow anyone to come here illegally and kill a child.

            Oh, and the other point is you’re a Troll and based upon the number of votes you have to comments, few people want to hear from you anyway.

          • Frank B.

            BUT SHE IS HERE! That’s the fucking point!

          • Do as I say, not as I do

            Why? Was she going to die if the baby wasn’t murdered? Just curious as to how she “required” medical murder? Or was it simply a case of, “if dad finds out I’m a whore at 15 years old, he’ll kill me”?

          • Frank B.

            After your nazi salute, you have no moral ground to say shit to me or anyone else. Fuck you. You nazi bastard!

          • bob breglio

            Her life was not in danger, dunderhead. She just didn’t want to have to see the consequence of her immoral actions pop out and have to be nurtured and raised. They should have shipped her ass back to wherever she came from and told the judge to stick it. We need to impeach this legal idiot.

          • Frank B.

            Are you a doctor? If not I don’t want to hear your political bull shit.

        • David in MA

          Frank B is a troll.

          • floral

            Add willfully ignorant and idiotic and ridiculous and illogical and irrational and bratty and devoid of civility, vocabulary and intelligence. THT are a very few of the adjectives that apply to that loser.

        • floral

          Frank understands NOTHING. “she” is NOT a citizen, is here illegally and should not be given anything, esp not elective procedures that rid her of the consequences of her actions. “she” does NOT need any mdical care. Abortions are NOT “medically necessary”

          • Murphmeister

            In some circumstances, an abortion can be a medical necessity.

          • David Nichols

            And in some circumstances, murder can be a medical necessity.

          • Paul Allen

            In rare circumstances.

            So, because of the anomaly we should allow the murder other children because people can’t keep it in their pants and keep their legs closed? We should allow the entire world to enter our country and pay for their stupid mistakes? If YOU want to pay for it, then be my guest, but don’t force the rest of us to do it.

          • Murphmeister

            I was only rebutting the blanket statement that abortions are not a medical necessity. To save the life of the mother, I think so. In cases of rape or incest, that’s a moral conundrum.

          • floral

            You rebutted NOTHING. Abortion is never a medical necessity, Nothing is a medical necessity. Allopathic medicine is not a necessity, nor particularly effective and in no wise is it “health care”. To save the life of the mother= WHAT circumstances? you are not a doctor nor a woman and you are not qualified to state anything about pregnancy. It is NOT abortion to crush the skull of the baby stuck in the birth canal and it is NOT necessary. If the “doctor” delivering did not know what might go wrong in the delivery, he was not paying attention and did not advise Cesarean at 7.5 months. Mother’s life at stake is a rare and unforeseen event at time of delivery and abortion cannot be performed to save the life of the mother. It is way too late.

          • DOGTOWNE

            This Illegal Alien and the ACLU along with the Court just made it possible for All Illegals to come here for American Paid Abortions..Our Constitution applies Worldwide now..

          • floral

            What circumstances are “medically necessary? There are none, unless you think “medical decision” is god, and absolutely unquestionable and scientific and without doubt and not just “practice” and profit/politically/ oriented.

          • Murphmeister

            Try this one – to save the life of the mother.

          • floral

            When to save the life of the mother? Pregnancy is not a disease and pregnancy in and of itself never causes death. There are instances where medical mistakes and/or placentia previa endanger the pregnancy and rarely, after normal delivery, excessive uncontrollable bleeding occur but then it is too late to “abort”. You an expert on pregnancy? Ever have one? death from pregnancy is very rare and usually occurs from the delivery or medical procedure.
            There have been very rare cases where the baby’s head is too large for the abnormally small pelvic passage of the mother and in the 50’s and 60’s

            some vile doctors crushed the head of the baby killing it, but that is not abortion. Since ultrasound is routine, almost all problems with delivery can be mitigated…..

          • Murphmeister

            When did I ever say that pregnancy is a disease. Abortions are very infrequently employed when the life of the mother is at stake. Very rare does not mean never. There are also cases where doctors have advised women not to get pregnant again because the mother’s health is so fragile the pregnancy could very well imperil her life. Stop being an absolutist.

          • floral

            Stop being a particularist. Hard cases make bad laws. Even PP stats show no health reasons substantiated for abortions or even rape.
            As noted before, I was told I would not survive a pregnancy, but the doctor lied, as the ones I have dealt with have done without fail. Your comment is not supported even by your opinions masquerading as fact. Just because a doctor “advises” against pregnancy does not mean “abortion”. Just because a baby’s skull is crushed to get it out of the birth canal, when being delivered does not mean it is an abortion.
            Doctors and PP treat pregnancy as a disease, as did that Malthusian eugenicist Sanger who founded PP and gave Nazis a weapon with which to continue genocide.

          • floral

            Prove it-not reported to the CDC and not done by PP. You have only supposition, not proof that any abortion is done for the life of the mother.

          • barnjoer

            And not screwing cannput A stop to this!!

      • Do as I say, not as I do

        Did you enjoy eating the remains of the fetus? Fetus don’t fail me now, eh Franky

        • niknar

          As an aside, I love that song whence you took your line: “25 Miles” by Edwin Starr, 1969. So much spirit in it!

        • Frank B.

          If that’s all I had to eat, then so be it. Next dumb ass Question Please!

    • David in MA

      Speaking of which, it is “rumored” that Webb Hubble is the father of hag Hillary’s child, could her name be what it is because she was conceived at the CHELSEA HOTEL, in NYC? (Women do things like this)

  • Babsan

    This is the DESTRUCTION done by Democrats infiltrating COMMUNISTS in the school system late 50’s or maybe even earlier.A brainwashed college educated Communist Elite/Judges set on destruction of America.A dumbed down society also elected a Muslim FRAUD that set the destruction on steroids.We are dealing with a CRIMINAL Democrat party and their co criminals

  • Jack Feeney

    Yeah, that makes sense! Preventing an illegal woman from having an abortion is being called a “War on Children” by those WISE souls on the Left! DAH!!!!!

  • Jack Feeney

    KILLING them is OK, but PREVENTING their death is WAR! Left Wing Lunacy!

  • Frank B.

    The constitution applies to anyone who is physically in this country. Also, we, unlike other barbaric countries, don’t deny medical care to someone, just because you don’t like their status or race.

    And no doubt, the ignorant rightwing bastards on this site, as usual, don’t know what the fuck they are talking about.

    • David in MA

      Wrong, ghetto boy!

      • Frank B.

        Just like a typical redneck asshole. You don’t know shit so you offer bull shit.

    • Terri Newman

      an abortion is not “medical care” better to remain silent and thought a fool than to speak and remove all doubt.

      • Frank B.

        LOL LOL LOL. That’s so typical of dumb ass republicans. Ok bitch, then in your view a woman should simply stop by the nearest Burger King, order an Original Chicken Sandwich, fries, and two Abortions, to go?!?

        Of course it’s medical care you god damn flaming moron!!!

  • Frank B.

    A bunch of whining ass redneck crackers. You mother fuckers want something to worry about? Well the Special Prosecutor, just got his first indictment this past Friday. And that ignorant bastard in office is getting nervous! LOL LOL LOL

    • Terri Newman

      better to remain silent and thought a fool than to speak and remove all doubt.

      • Frank B.

        Then why the fuck did you open your ignorant mouth? You dumb bastard! LOL LOL LOL

        • Terri Newman

          I know you but what am I?

          • Frank B.

            Answer: YOU ARE A GOD DAMN FLAMING IDIOT & FUCKED-UP MORON! Any more questions?

          • Terri Newman

            speak from where I fucked you last!

          • Frank B.

            You mean from where your tongue was last night. Up the crack of my black ass mother fucker!

  • ConstantReader

    Can we make the abortions for illegal aliens retroactive?

    • floral

      FB provides the rationale for post birth abortion (whatever chronological age he happens to be at the moment.)

  • CUZIN ERN

    Wrong’s the word so, just burn the books and live it up??

  • Manuel Gonzales

    I thought the only ones who could make changes to the Constitution or add amendments was Congress.
    Of course Obama had his own way, as most dictators do, but he isn’t dictating anymore so that rule under his orders does not apply anymore.
    Besides. His presidency was not legal as he is a foreigner and can’t be president. Now he can, hopefully, go back to Kenya, his home of birth, and he can be a dictator there.

  • GuardianFlame

    Too bad our Constitition doesn’t say we can incarcerate those with misfiring brains like the Feminists and Liberals. But we’d have to build a prison half the size of Texas to house them. OR we could just drop them in the Middle East and let the terrorists deal with them!

    So sad that those feminist liberal “creatures” (can’t even call them “humans” any more because they willingly and excitedly “kill” their unborn) are allowed to walk our Country along with normal sane people. They are a warped and evil driven group that has not one shred of consciousness of right or wrong — and in the end, THEY WILL BE JUDGED FOR THEIR IMMORAL SINS FOR ETERNITY. Glad they will find out the consequences of their misguided unforgiving egocentric lives…

    And at the end of their lives they will “meet” face to face the children they allowed to be killed and butchered — that WILL BE THE FATE THEY WILL BE FORCED TO ENDURE AS THE JUDGMENT FROM GOD. They are to be pitied…

    • Charles

      Wrong, just send all commies through the adult abortion center

      • GuardianFlame

        OMG! I love your comment! That’s exactly what we should do! Very well put!

  • Timothy Toroian

    That’s why we need 30 or 40 foot walls that flair out a bit at the top and are then rounded so one cannot get a grip or use a grappling hook.I want to see somebody climb one and then try to jump. Splat! No matter which side they land on.

  • Jeff

    The left never stops with their B.S. antiques, poor immigrant who could get a abortion, but couldn’t use a condom, how brave of her, way to use our system, P.O.S!

  • John D

    The Federal Courts are corrupt and the judges need to be impeached and locked up.

    • Charles

      Abort them.

    • floral

      Some of them, esp the ninth circuit are idiots and should be removed.

  • jimdarnall

    All of Congress should be demanded to take a real course on understanding the constitution. This should also hold true for high school students. The continued miss speaking of what the constitution really says and means will destroy our nation and these people doing so should be put in their place as ignorants and anti American.

    • Charles

      Make them attend a class at Hillsdale. They provide a great lesson plan on the Constitution. And make it so the congresscritters have to pass a rigorous exam before they can return to their chambers

  • Ted Duke

    I usually appreciate satire, but not this time. Abortion is too serious a topic for that.

    • Larry Huff

      Stop pretending that you care about BROWN fetuses and babies because you don’t, you racist savage.

  • Gerry Costa

    I didn’t even have to read the article to guess it was an obozo appointed libtard puppet dirtbag judge that made such an Un-American ridiculous ruling. Guess the single most stipulation of becoming a judge(or immitation of) appointed by obozo the fraud was that they never had and promise never to read our Constitution or know our laws. Two words come to mind for ALL of obozo’s puppet libtard judges — HELTER – SKELTER !!!!!!

    • Charles

      We need to begin aborting all of the commie judges.

  • David in MA

    Where is it, let alone it applies to a non-American citizen?

    • Skip Moreland

      By reading what the framers of the constitution said about equal rights. Thus the supreme court has ruled that non-citizens have equal rights.

      Representative John Bingham, one of the principal framers of the amendment, emphasized that one of the purposes of the amendment was to ensure “that all persons, whether citizens or strangers, within this land, shall have equal protection in every State in this Union in the rights of life and liberty and property.” While the framers were especially concerned with ending discrimination against African-Americans, they also sought to curb growing state discrimination against immigrants.

      • David in MA

        An illegal alien/immigrant has no rights under America’s Constitution except in the minds of liberals, the illegals as non-citizens are not subject to the Constitution because as citizens of another country they have no allegiance to America, this is why the immigration process requires their swearing allegiance to America when they become American citizens thru the process. (same goes for dual citizenship, what country do they hold allegiance to? (any country which coddles them but when the SHTF, they run back to the safety of their true country of allegiance)))))

        NO, non-citizens have no responsibility to America and America has none towards them.

        You say:” they also sought to curb growing state discrimination against immigrants.”

        I say: they also sought to curb growing state discrimination against LEGAL IMMIGRANTS, Which most were, at the time. Your mixing the criteria of a new nation with that of a established nation, different time and different world.

  • JOEL714

    I WOULD PREFER WE ABORT ALL ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS NO MATTER WHAT AGE THEY ARE FROM CONCEPTION TO AGE 1006.

    • Charles

      And we should gather any lefty citizens along too. Musloids? Yup abort! Obnoxious blacks? Yup abort! Anti-second amendment activists? Yup abort!

  • William

    This is very simple ,,,, We Contact our congressmen/women and ORDER them to reverse this stupidity! Or, they can join the Unemployment Lines!

  • Calvin Harwick

    The moral of the story is that there is no real justice only personal opinions of appeasers to please the people by following behind them ?????????

  • dick yocum

    I am sick and tired of paying for these illegals SEND THEM BACK

  • Dave Campbell

    Oh those silly progressives! They sure are good at ferreting out those unenumerated rights but sure have trouble finding those that are enumerated, don’t they.

    This how the progressives amend the constitution without going through that pesky amendment process.

    Our civil rights are being destroyed under the guise of protecting our civil rights. Just like ANTIFA is a fascist movement under the guise of fighting fascism. Just like racism is being taught in our universities under the guise of fighting racism. See a pattern? This is how leftists are going to destroy the country. They get useful idiots to fight for the very things they believe they are fighting against.

    • Do as I say, not as I do

      And think they’re so much smarter cuz they went to 4 extra years of baby sitting.

  • MIKE6080

    no anchor baby to keep her here now , deport her immediately

    • J_in_TX

      No such thing as an anchor baby.

      • floral

        Per a twisted interpretation of natural born, a child born in the us to an illegally entered mother, is a US citizen at birth (anchor for the mother to stay). However, the Constitution is clear on the subject and anyone who owes allegiance to a foreign power cannot claim citizenship for their children born in the US (like diplomats) and visitors.
        Unfortunately, some idiot libs and likewise idiot justices, decided that students from pakistan who were married and attending college in the US, whose child was born in the US but taken and raised from the age of 2, back to the middle east when the students graduated, was a US citizen IF she “took up her citizenship” by age 21. That resulted in a muslim who never resided in the US before age 19 and was raised radical muslim, worked for radical muslim organization, had a brother and father who were radical muslims (brotherhood) whose mother is even more radical, rose to deputy state dept under hillbilly clinton.

  • Patriot1490

    I am not in favor of abortion, but at this point, since the illegal alien is not going to be an anchor mom we can deport her sorry ass back to where ever it is she came from.

    • J_in_TX

      There is no such thing as an anchor mom. Just another example of liberals that fail to understand the Constitution.

      • Patriot1490

        J_in_TX. I know, but it’s the term liberals are familiar with. Unfortunately they have fooled many judges who were appointed with no knowledge of the difference between right and wrong, so I was just trying to make it easy for them to understand

        • J_in_TX

          I’m not sure you can dumb it down that much.

      • floral

        No, it is anchor baby, because by a twisted interpretation of natural born, any child born in the US is a US citizen and mom gets to stay to care for the child. The Constitution does say that no one who owes allegiance to a foreign government (illegals illegally in this country) can claim citizenship for children born on US soil. (ie diplomats, invaders etc)

    • Do as I say, not as I do

      So send her azz home. Pronto.

  • Buck Stearns

    The Constitution was based on Christian principles as they are clearly enunciated in the Holy Bible, & does not need interpretation. It says what it says. Freedom of Religion meant absence of a state-supported denomination taxing both adherents & those of different persuasions. “Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other.” — John Adams

    Claims of a “living document” notwithstanding, there is only one legal way to change it, & that is by Constitutional Amendment. Thus, correct interpretation is that if something like sodomy or the life of the human unborn comes up in conversation, the Constitution as extension of Christian beliefs is clearly against those & considers them sinful. On the other hand, tolerance of racial & sexual differences is entirely a different matter, & discussed in the scriptures under the heading of Love. The Constitution does not abide those things considered immoral by God nor encourage their adoption, but still tolerates them within reason. True Christians understand & abide by this guiding principle:

    “Judge not, that ye be not judged. For with what judgment ye judge, ye shall be judged: and with what measure ye mete, it shall be measured to you again. And why beholdest thou the mote that is in thy brother’s eye, but considerest not the beam that is in thine own eye?” — Matthew 7:1-3 (KJV)

  • MajorPain

    What gets me is they say it’s their Constitutional Right when actually the only Constitutional Women’s right they have as of this date is the right to vote. The Equal Rights Amendment passed by Congress in 1972 hasn’t gotten enough State Ratification yet to be added to the Constitution as of this date Nevada was the last one they still need 3 more states to add it to the Constitution.

    • niknar

      Yes, keep them in slavery! And whose idea was it to give them the right to vote in the first place?

      • floral

        ASSuming again? What slavery? Nobody forces a woman to get pregnant (outside of long term kidnapping and rape-a very rare occurrence for which abortion is not an option)

        • niknar

          “a very rare occurrence for which abortion is not an option” Says who? Just because you say so doesn’t make it true. You make a lot of fallacious claims.

  • Murphmeister

    The only consolation is ( and its a small one indeed ) is that there’s one less anchor baby. I wonder who was advising her on her legal rights. The abortion makes it so much easier to deport her.

    • niknar

      This is an important point people who oppose abortion might want to consider. The bulk of abortions happen to people you don’t want reproducing, anyway. Do you want someone who indiscriminately has sex, creates babies, & wants abortions because she either doesn’t want to or can’t afford to or is incapable of raising a baby to be forced to have a baby with her (& his, whoever the father is, & in some cases it could be a rapist) genes to populate our country further? Think about it!

      • floral

        you need to think about how fallacious are your comments. Pregnancy from rape is statistically insignificant (3k per FBI stats) and more than half opt to keep the pregnancies. Abortion is almost NEVER medically necessary and that claim is an excuse to evade the consequences of casual sex. I was told by a doctor it was “medically necessary” to terminate my pregnancy, because I was “short” and the by would be retarded because I was “old”. He was playing God the devil. I had an easy pregnancy, easier delivery without medication and a very healthy baby who grew up to be very smart, attractive, tall productive person. You think about how stupid and illogical YOU are. Abortion is wrong and NOT a Constitutional right. Even those idiot justices who said so, ALSO said that if Congress passes the life at conception act, that RvW is void. Even Roe decries the decision –

        • niknar

          You made the right decision for yourself, & I’m glad you prevailed over that misguided doctor. But I don’t think that you have the right to make that decision for other women in similar predicaments.

          • floral

            Your opinion about my RIGHT is silly and stupid and illogical. I have the right to express my opinion about the immorality and stupidity of claiming abortion is a Constitutional RIGHT. It is not and the SCOTUS decision in RvW was not a valid one and was substantially reversed in subsequent decisions acknowledging the power of the States to regulate and limit abortions.
            Women who wanted abortions always got them. The rate of abortions due to claims of rape exponentially increased in the first few yrs after RvW. A lot of men went to prison for rape unjustly. Now, thanks to the bigotry of PP, abortion on demand is the rule and PP makes a huge profit on killing black babies. Perhaps you don’t KNOW the truth about the founder of PP, Sanger, who hated blacks poor immigrants and went out of her way to commit genocide, esp towards blacks. THAT is what you support, with specious opinions and a political, not legal or constitutional, SCOTUS “opinion”.

          • niknar

            Of course, you have the right to express your opinion, but remember it’s just your opinion, not law or truth.

          • floral

            Yet you said I was “denying” others their right to choose. Hypocritical much? Illogical for sure….SCOTUS decision in RvW is also NOT law and was virtually gutted by 3 subsequent decisions allowing/mandating states’s rights to limit and regulate abortions. Some “right” to murder you espouse.
            Remember, YOUR opinion is just that, an opinion that flies in the face of law, history, fact and the Constitution as explained by the Founders.

          • niknar

            I didn’t say you were actually denying anybody, but you surely are advocating for such a denial, & my point is that I think that no woman should be forced to give birth to a baby she doesn’t want or can’t afford. It’s her body, so it has to be her decision.

          • floral

            Bull. YOU are advocating for abortion. I did NOT advocate for denying any Constitutional right.

          • floral

            So you are okay with “doctors” who encourage abortions, deliver the head and thrust a knife into the brain or snip the spinal column or deliver alive babies and leave them to die on a cold dirty table?
            If it is her body alone, why can a woman be charged with child abuse, for taking drugs during pregnancy or charged with murder for delivering and abandoning a old baby? Why did the woman get pregnant in the first place? If it is her body and she does not WANT to have a baby, why did she risk pregnancy in the first place? NOT the baby’s fault she is an immoral creep who won’t take responsibility and/or is manipulated into an abortion by the lies and immorality of abortion advocates…..

          • niknar

            Why? Sometimes it’s rape or sexual abuse. And even if it was for some foolish, thoughtless reason, do you really want that kind of woman (& man) reproducing, especially when she doesn’t even want to care for a child? The fortunes of such a fetus, should it be forced to be born, are very dim, & often become one of poverty & crime. Are you happy if a forced birth child becomes a mass murderer? Wouldn’t you say it was better that that child had never been born at all? We have far more people than our world can sustain, anyway!

          • floral

            Not the baby’s fault. You must be an eugenicist to make such a specious argument. Out of 64 mill pregnancies (FBI figures) less than 3k are from rape. It is NOT medically necessary.
            That argument is Sanger’s eugenics argument. the poor or black or italian or irish should not be reproducing, because the future is “dim”. Specious, immoral and idiotic, illogical, irrational. The “doctors” told my niece her 2nd child would be severely retarded and tried to make her abort. She did not, and the child is genius level intelligence, extraordinarily beautiful and healthy.
            Nobody is “forced” to be born. Abortion is forced termination.

          • niknar

            Not the baby’s fault it became a mass murderer? I don’t care whose fault it is — but at least part of the fault lies with whoever prevented the mother from getting an abortion. The additional innocent lives lost because of the existence of that unwanted fetus becoming a mass murderer is what’s important.

            I stand by my arguments.

          • floral

            ASSuming again! Which “mass murderer” was born to a poor woman or unwanted or from rape or without a father to grow up? Hitler was born into a middle class family, presumably wanted (prove otherwise).
            How about Stalin, Lenin, or the terrorists who have committed mass murder in the US? Which one was UNWANTED?

          • niknar

            It’s not 100% of course; nothing ever is. But the probability that an unwanted fetus becomes a criminal is far greater than for a desired & cared for baby.

          • floral

            In your specious and uninformed opinion, only. Menendez brothers, the uni bomber, ME terrorists (their religion of peace prohibits abortion and mandates death to homosexuals). Is it POSSIBLE any baby from any circumstance grows up and becomes a criminal? But “mass murderer” simply by being born to someone who does in your imagination not want the baby after birth, is not even probable. For one, if not wanted (and every woman I know who thought they did not want the baby before birth, loved and nurtured the baby afterwards) the child is placed elsewhere.
            Your “logic” is non existent.
            You have heard of “welfare moms” have you not? The more children they have the more money they get. No abortions for them-do they WANT those children-do they care for them? Even PP stats show that most of the abortions they perform are on middleclass women, especially black single women, for reasons of economics, not health.

          • niknar

            The unwanted kids are generally placed in foster homes, traveling from 1 to another as they grow up. If they’re lucky, they’ll be adopted at some point, & if they’re even luckier, the family that adopts them won’t be abusive & will keep them. But not so many are that lucky.

            Many of those against abortion are also against birth control of any kind, & against the distribution of contraceptives to poor countries, where overpopulation is a huge problem. Overpopulation is a major reason for many if not most of the major problems this world faces, but you are happy to populate the world with countless unwanted, uncared for, impoverished, miserable children

          • floral

            And the mothers never considered abortion, because if they wanted one, they are available.
            You are still ignoring the point that just because YOU think a child is unwanted, that does NOT mean that the child will be a mass murderer (or criminal) or that abortion would prevent a mass murderer.

          • floral

            Criminal is NOT equal to “mass murder” and there are all levels of “crime”. Supposedly “white collar crime” is the most prevalent.

          • niknar

            “white collar crime” You mean the one the Republican Party & Democratic corporatists support, repeatedly letting perpetrators get away with their crimes, scot-free?

          • floral

            How do you KNOW that the baby not aborted is unwanted and how do you know that the child knows it unwanted and how do you know that the child is more likely to become a mass murder? What is the statistic from the FBI about the significance of mass murder? It is less than 1% of all murders, even including non citizen terror attacks.
            Once again, you are illogical and without fact. Perhaps it is significant that you changed your tune from “mass murderer” to criminal, but even that won’t wash.
            You ASSume a great deal, and that is prima facie evidence you are illogical.

          • niknar

            You are the personification of “illogical”. Since you have no ability to interpret statistics, it’s useless trying to explain it to you.

          • floral

            You stand on quicksand if you think you have any valid “arguments”. Nothing you have said is a logical argument, just specious opinion on no facts but your imagination

          • niknar

            Since you have no capacity for reasoning, whatever you say is meaningless.

          • floral

            That does apply to you, ASSumer.

          • floral

            NO, NO and NO. I would make an exception for post birth adult abortion in the case of the insanely illogical and specious reasoning like yours. Why do you assume that mass murderers were poor and unwanted? Who are you-God? Is your motto, kill all 3rd world babies and sterilize all poor women and let God sort it out? What is your excuse for the Menendez brothers born rich, or OJ born middle class, celebrated football player, the uni bomber (harvard)?

          • floral

            Neither is YOUR opinion, law or truth and it flies in the face of the values of the FOUNDERS of our republic established to protect the individual rights FROM the government. SCOTUS cannot make law or establish rights. Abortion is not a right, constitutionally or otherwise.

          • niknar

            What hypocrisy! You want the government to intrude into an individual’s right to make her own decisions about her body.

          • floral

            No, I want the government to NOT intrude into MY rights. SCOTUS had NO right or power to assert as constitutional a right that denies life, liberty and pursuit of happiness to anyone.
            If a person, male or female makes a decision about his/her “body” that intrudes on another’s rights to life, liberty or pursuit of happiness, or denies freedom of religion, speech and association, then that decision is immoral and criminal.
            Abortion does not affect just a woman, but the man and the incipient life. Nothing you have said about decisions, and mass murderers and criminality or abuse (lots of “wanted” children are abused and abortion does not prevent that) justifies abortion or SCOTUS specious finding of a right in “penumbrae” (sp).

          • niknar

            “No, I want the government to NOT intrude into MY rights.” Very telling. Your selfishness is so irrepressible that you screechingly demand your own selfish rights while trampling on other people’s rights.

          • floral

            I trample on NO ONE’s rights, but you deny my right to express my opinion and insist on “rights” and justifications that have no basis in morality, Constitution, law, logic or rationality.
            You are the selfish one, trampling on the rights of all in defense of the indefensible.

          • niknar

            Who is denying your right to express your opinion? You’re expressing your opinion all over the place; in fact, you’re following me around, expressing your opinion at every opportunity you have.

            Of course, you might as well take advantage of it while we still have freedom of expression. Freedom of expression is a right that Trump would gladly take away from us if he could.

          • floral

            Straw man fallacious argument. I have not made any decision for anyone, but my c onclusion drawn from study of law, history, the Founding is that abortion is NOT a right, is Sanger’s legacy of genocide, is both unlawful, immoral and contrary to good sense, logic rationality, civil society freedom and equality.

          • niknar

            Again that’s just your opinion.

            Who or what is Sanger?

          • floral

            Again, YOUR opinion is flawed and ignorant. Sangerwas a racist eugenicist who FOUNDED PP. She HATED blacks and attempted genocide on blacks and immigrants and made common cause with the KKK,.

          • niknar

            I don’t know where you got your information from (but I’m sure it is from right-wing propaganda of some kind), but I do thank you for bringing this person to light for me. I looked her up on a site that is politically neutral, Wikipedia, & I learned what a truly extraordinary, admirable, courageous, conscientious woman she was, enduring so much abuse to stand up for the reproductive rights of women. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Margaret_Sanger

            In a quite detailed history about her, there is no mention of any affinity for eugenics. She was concerned about overpopulation & how it led to poverty, famine & war, making her very prescient for her day.

            And as to being racist, quite to the contrary, she worked in black neighborhoods with black community leaders to ensure that they had adequate access to contraception. An excerpt:

            Sanger worked with African American leaders and professionals who saw a need for birth control in their communities. In 1929, James H. Hubert, a black social worker and the leader of New York’s Urban League, asked Sanger to open a clinic in Harlem.[75] Sanger secured funding from the Julius Rosenwald Fund and opened the clinic, staffed with black doctors, in 1930. The clinic was directed by a 15-member advisory board consisting of black doctors, nurses, clergy, journalists, and social workers. The clinic was publicized in the African-American press as well as in black churches, and it received the approval of W. E. B. Du Bois, the co-founder of the NAACP and the editor of its magazine, The Crisis.[76][77][78][79] Sanger did not tolerate bigotry among her staff, nor would she tolerate any refusal to work within interracial projects.[80] Sanger’s work with minorities earned praise from Martin Luther King, Jr., in his 1966 acceptance speech for the Margaret Sanger award.[81]

            From 1939 to 1942 Sanger was an honorary delegate of the Birth Control Federation of America, which included a supervisory role—alongside Mary Lasker and Clarence Gamble—in the Negro Project, an effort to deliver birth control to poor black people. Sanger, over the objections of other supervisors, wanted the Negro Project to hire black ministers in leadership roles. To emphasize the benefits of hiring black community leaders to act as spokesmen, she wrote to Gamble:

            We should hire three or four colored ministers, preferably with
            social-service backgrounds, and with engaging personalities. The most successful educational approach to the Negro is through a religious appeal. We don’t want the word to go out that we want to exterminate the Negro population, and the minister is the man who can straighten out that idea if it ever occurs to any of their more rebellious members.

            New York University’s Margaret Sanger Papers Project says that though the letter would have been meant to avoid the mistaken notion that the Negro Project was a racist campaign, conspiracy theorists have fraudulently attempted to exploit the quotation “as evidence she led a calculated effort to reduce the black population against their will”.

            Aha! That’s where you got your misinformation! Typical!

          • floral

            Aha! YOU got false information. I learned of her record when I was a lib dem pro abortionist BEFORE RvW FROM lib/dem/prog pro abortion feminists. Sanger is well known for, and lauded for her Malthusian eugenics (adopted wholesale by the Nazis and applied to all “undesirable races” that she identified) and her relationship with the KKK and the Black project, which was sterilization/abortions for blacks. The current push by PP and their record of abortions among black women (60% of all abortions performed on black women)

          • floral

            Typical of you to ignore the context and blame it on conspiracy theorists. Of course PP wants to white wash (pun intended) Sanger’s reality. The proof is in the bald, vile, specious activities and lies and fraud of PP and the uses to which her eugenics have been put.

          • niknar

            Wow! You are really nuts!

          • floral

            Ad hominem again. Specious and fallacious logic.

          • niknar

            You love to use those words you misunderstand & use inappropriately, but it doesn’t take away from the fact that you will believe whatever outlandish claim the right-wing propaganda machine makes.

          • floral

            I am not a “right winger” and you are engaging AGAIN in ad hominem attacks. It is hardly “outlandish” to oppose abortion, especially using PP’s own stats.

          • niknar

            Well, you strike me as an hysterical woman constantly enraged & ready to believe whatever outrageous things you hear that fit your narrow-minded beliefs, & lash out at whoever won’t accept your inanity.

          • floral

            You are looking in a mirror.
            Your specious perceptions about me are patently and obviously false. You strike me as a man who has not a clue about women, hormones, statistics or facts.
            I did not lash out at you-you lashed out at me, saying my opinion about abortion was denying others their “rights”. You strike me as a lib/dem/prog without an ounce of rationality, which is, statistically speaking, redundant on my part.

          • niknar

            You are redundant, I’ll give you that. Redundant in the extreme!

          • floral

            That is your reply? No logic, no point by point refutation? Looking in the mirror again?

          • niknar

            I already refuted you in the previous statement, & in the face of your denial, I stand by those comments.

          • floral

            You refuted NOTHING. You have no facts, just specious opinions and you failed to address a SINGLE point or fact or opinion I expressed.
            An unwanted child (how do you know with the 10’s of millions of abortions perfored since RvW) will become a “mass murderer”? Your conclusions, opinions and illogic and irrationality are obvious and horrifying.
            I can only conclude that you are an immoral, unthinking, uneducated, unfeeling lib/dem/prog (redundant I know since lib/dem/progs are in general deserving of those adjectives).

          • niknar

            I said the probability is much greater, but since you have no understanding of statistical probability, it means nothing to you, & you make these deranged accusations.

          • floral

            No you did not, and the “probability” is NOT greater. You have NO evidence or statistics that will support that deranged accusation.

          • niknar

            Nice to know that I’ve helped you expand your vocabulary.

          • floral

            You are vocabulary deficient and illogical. You have NOT “expanded” anything.

          • floral

            Wikipedia “politically neutral”? That would be funny if not so tragically stupid. Who do you think writes each article? Nobody “neutral”. Each is written by an advocate. Read Obama’s white wash job on Wikipedia sometime. Hardly “objective” or “politically neutral”.

          • floral

            I was “poor” also but I and my baby lacked for nothing important to health and happiness. So much for anyone judging who is fit to reproduce.

          • niknar

            The difference is you wanted the baby. You wanted it so bad that you took a risk, defying your doctor’s advice, & got lucky with the result. And now that the result for you turned out so good, you want to insist that every mother make the same decision as you did. But not everybody in your situation will have your luck. And not every pregnant woman has the desire for a baby you had.

          • floral

            No, I did NOT want to be pregnant at that point, but I took responsibility for my carelessness. It was NOT LUCK, but taking responsibility, developing morality, and making positive and moral and ethical choices.
            You ASSumer!

          • niknar

            Incorrect.

            I didn’t say you wanted to be pregnant. I said that having become pregnant you wanted to have that baby, which is true according to what you told me.

            The doctor, according to your comment, advised you to terminate the pregnancy because according to his assessment of your condition, he thought it likely the baby would turn out retarded, so It WAS luck that she turned out normal according to you. That doesn’t negate your assertion that you took responsibility & made an ethical choice according to your moral code, nor does it mean that somebody else wouldn’t choose differently according to her moral code. Giving birth to a likely retarded baby that she couldn’t adequately care for may under somebody else’s moral code be considered unethical.

          • floral

            BS to the max, ASSumer. The Doctor said a lot of things, I was too poor to care for a child, much less a baby, that a pregnancy would kill me, that my health would suffer, that I would have to go on welfare(I was told previously I could never get pregnant), that it would be “immoral” of me to raise a child as a single mother, that no man would ever want to marry me with a child in addition to what I already said. He exerted a lot of pressure even to the point of saying how expensive pregnancy care was (for him) and how much cheaper an abortion he went on and on.
            It was UNETHICAL for the dr to put his profit and greed (abortions paid better than pregnancy care) above the health and welfare of ME.
            What “moral code” is involved in killing a fetus in utero (or partially out) for financial reasons? The doctor LIED about everything he said to me. There was NO risk that my child would be retarded. I was not too old, I was in exceptionally good health, my family history for as many generations as we had documented, was of multiple pregnancies, live births, no retardation. Both my maternal and paternal grandparents and great grandparents had families of 10-25 children, only 3 of whom failed to get to age 5 and the rest to old healthy age (90+ even during the depression) WITHOUT medical care at any point.
            Supposed Dr Creed. First do no harm…..I know many women, one in my family, that had abortions. I’ve counseled many of them after. Without exception, they have regretted yielding to the pressure to abort. About 80% of them experienced medical issues, some chronic, as a result and many were infertile as a result.
            You have no knowledge or logic on which to stand in your specious opinion that “women have a moral right to abort for any reason they choose” especially not to prevent mass murders.

          • niknar

            Oh, God! 10-25 children! No wonder! Too bad nobody got to your family long before your ancestors populated the country with thousands of ignorant, nonsensical people like you. No wonder this country has been going downhill so long!

          • floral

            Proof of your illogic-more ad hominems. You sound like Sanger, the Malthusian eugenicist and incipient nazi and genocidal horror.

            I have famous generals, admirals, west pointers, many officers in my ancestors, all the way back to the War of Independence. Others were farmers, ranchers and native Americans. Most were named after presidents, not one a dud or a criminal and many had real educations, not like the public school products who cannot stick to a point and employ only logic fallacies.
            Most of the Founders came from very large families and long lived healthy persons……who were educated. I’ll bet you know nothing of the Federalist Papers, or even the Commentaries on the Constitution written by Chief Justice Story.

          • niknar

            With thousands of relatives, you’re bound to find a few you can admire.

          • floral

            You are appealing to GOD? Invoking GOD? All indications point to you as atheist. Don’t you know that children are considered a blessing?
            My point, which you answered only with ad hominem attacks, was that the doctor(s) I dealt with refused to acknowledge my family history of successful pregnancies and healthy children. They LIED.

          • niknar

            Is your God anything like this?

            https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=__khgIzMyaM

          • floral

            A fool in his folly denies the LORD. Knowledge of Jehovah is the beginning of wisdom.

          • niknar

            It’s the beginning of mindless obedience to authoritarian figures.

          • floral

            Not LUCK at all. The dr was a greedy liar and incompetent. He was trying to play god without any ability or knowledge to do so.
            I did not want the baby, but I knew it was my responsibility to nurture and care for her and felt despite the immoral and illegal pressure he was putting on me, that I needed to protect the life within me. Most women not on drugs or under the undue influence of others, feel the same way. One dr tried to abort me without my knowledge (told me I was not pregnant but gave me pills “to bring on my period”. I almost died, the pregnancy survived) The next dr tried to get me to abort for all the specious reasons I have already detailed.
            You are ASSuming again, that drs KNOW, but they have agendas, biases, and god complex. It is not called medical certainty, just medical practice, and I will not take any dr’s advice nor pills without my informed research. BTW, most women who get abortions do so in PP WITHOUT a doctor’s exam.

          • niknar

            You seem to be very adept at finding what you consider incompetent & immoral doctors. I suppose that is the same with every other aspect of your life, including whence you get your information.

          • floral

            You seem awkward at twisting my words to suit your deranged irrationality.

  • I care

    The C does not say that? But in a way no kids no gang bangers….. STUPID GIRLS

  • Name

    It is time to clean out the court system. We have to many nut jobs thinking that if there is no actual law they can make the law themselves.

  • Jim McCormack

    THE CONSTITUTION HAS BEEN TOTALLY SHREDDED. DO WE HAVE TO HAVE AN ARMED REVOLT ? LIBERAL JUSTICES ARE WIPPING THEIR FEET ON THE LAW OF THE LAND, MAKING DECISIONS BASED ONHOW THEY “FEEL”. THIS IS WRONG .IT’S NOT WHAT I FOUGHT FOR . I’M FED UP WITH SESSIONS ,SCOTUS, THE FBI , DOJ , ALL OF THEM . THE CLINTONS BEND THE LAW. MUELLER IS DOING THEIR POLITICAL PROTECTION.

  • Skip Moreland

    The constitution applies to everyone in the US, citizen or non-citizen. Always has. It just isn’t always applied. The constitution protects everyone’s right. Or it is suppose to. There are too many who are willing to throw away the constitution and rights because they hate some minority.

    • Paul Allen

      Complete B.S.

      The Constitution applies to US citizens. Our rights apply only so far as they do not infringe upon another’s right. By your logic, and the far left, the right to kill a child usurps the right of the child to life.

      Morality applies to everyone that is here, illegal or not.

      • Skip Moreland

        The 14th amendment says otherwise. The man who helped write the amendment says so also. He would call you a liar.
        And a fetus is still not a child. And the 4th amendment gives the right to the woman not to be pregnant.
        If conservatives hate abortion so much, stop trying to do away with contraceptions and education which help prevent pregnancies. Per 1000 people blue states have fewer abortions than red states.
        And don’t give me that tired old lie about conservatives not trying to do away with birth control. That was exactly what the hobby lobby judgement all about. It is what Trump did to make birth control harder to get. It is what happened when PP was closed in texas and they had a million more babies born because birth control was not available.
        Morality is not something the republicans practice at all. By closing health care centers, texas now has the highest infant and mother fatalities in the developed world, equal to countries like somalia. That is immoral. Practiced by denying health care.

    • floral

      I’ve read the Founding documents (inc the Federalist papers and Chief Justice Story’s Commentaries on the Constitution -1836) and never read anything about John Bingham. He is not a Founder. What amendment did he frame? because he had NOTHING to do with the Founding nor the first 10 amendments.
      “protection” is not a “right”, just “protection” and medical elective procedures are NOT a “right” nor law.

      • Skip Moreland

        https://constitutioncenter.org/blog/happy-birthday-john-bingham-one-of-americas-forgotten-second-founders
        Actually protection is a right. You are guaranteed protection by the constitution for your rights. That was the whole purpose of the bill of rights, to protect the rights of people.
        The supreme court decided that abortion is a right, just like many of our other rights. Strange that the founders didn’t make abortion illegal, since it was something done for thousands of years.

        • floral

          The 2nd amendment protects our rights. The 14th amendment is and has been misinterpreted, misused and mistreated. It does NOT mean illegals get constitutional rights, nor does it carve out special rights to sexual preference.
          Abortion was for thousand s of years considered a pagan rite and abomination. Jews and Christians rejected abortion, abhored it, and made laws against it (English common law specifically) thousands of yrs ago. The US was founded by Christians (see Madison, Adams, Jefferson et al) and abortion was a sin andcondemned and most of the colonies had specific laws against. The Founders did not codify sins or crimes such as theft, murder, adultery in the Constitution because that is the province of the states and common law.
          Again, your logic is fallacious,and just idiotic

          SCOTUS did NOT make abortion a right like the 1st amendment. They cannot. Laws and amendments are the exclusive province of Congress. That is a fallacious interpretation of what SCOTUS actually said and 3 subsequent decisions clearly gutted RvW by giving States the power and the right to limit abortions.

          • Skip Moreland

            Rights are not laws. Rights are given to us by the bill of rights, amendments , and the constitution. And according to the constitution, it is the judges who determine what are rights (they are not all defined) we have and what laws are constitutional. Congress passes and the judges get to interpret.
            The 1st is only one amendment and the right to privacy of the 4th amendment is what the court used in their decision. That the government had no right to violate the privacy of an individual. As for jewish law, abortion was legal and stated so in the bible. Genisis 38 Tamar was pregnant and was to be put to death for conceiving a child. In Hosea 13:16, god threatens to kill the unborn. Numerous times in the old testament god gives permission to kill the unborn. Killing the unborn was only seen as a property loss.
            The constitution doesn’t deal with law. But it does deal with rights and they could have stated that the unborn have rights such as the rest of us have. They didn’t do that. As for Jefferson, considering he wrote a new testament and wrote all the miracles out of it, doesn’t say much that he was a christian believer. He also wanted church and state to be separated and stated that. The founders deliberately kept religion out of government.
            Considering that to christians all religions except judaism are considered pagan and people who practiced such religions were/are either to convert or die, killing the unborn of those followers have never been illegal according to christians.
            English law is not thousands of years old. It wasn’t until the 17th century that abortion was made illegal in england. And it was legal under US law until the latter part of the 19th century. This was done by the medical field so that they could limit who did abortions to only doctors and was for business purposes.
            There is no such thing as special rights unless you are not allowed to marry for some reason like gays were denied that right. Having the same rights as you does not mean getting special rights. The only people who have had special rights in the US have been white people, they get rights they deny to others. But the constitution says otherwise, that everyone gets the same rights. What you want to do is make sure they don’t get those same rights you enjoy.
            And yes, actually the 14th amendment does say that illegals get the same rights as per the man who wrote the amendment.

          • floral

            Your final sentence is false and is ONLY the twisted deliberate misinterpretation of advocates posting on “lgbtqi….” websites. It is NOT the original Constitutional interpretation, not even by Bingham.
            Homosexuals as people not their sexual preferences, have EXACTLY the same legal rights as everyone.

            BTW, your interpretation of the Biblical stance on abortion is specious and false. Abortion was a pagan practice and abomination to Jehovah and His People. Tamar was not aborted.

          • floral

            Our Rights are inalienable and not subject to law. SCOTUS only “interprets” and judges LAWS as passed by Congress and only when challenged in lower courts and only if SCOTUS calls them up.
            Scotus does NOT determine RIGHTS, only judges laws in terms of the Constitution.
            RvW was gutted by subsequent decisions that restored the rights of the states to regulate abortion.

          • floral

            Actually English common law is thousands of years old. (Magna Carta) and what is the timeline from the 1600’s if not more than 1000 yrs?
            Abortion was not legal until the 1900’s when a couple of states passed laws that Made it legal in those states. Nobody gets special rights except those that get welfare and twisting of laws to make their formerly illegal behaviors “legal”.
            Bingham did NOT write the 14th amendment, He merely expanded the language after the fact, but it did not abrogate the Constitutional powers of Congress to determine naturalization. Illegals are NOT citizens, cannot be citizens and do not get the privileges of citizenship nor the responsibility.

        • floral

          He did not “craft” the amendment. He suggested some broadening of language which was not adopted in full. “ANy person” was not intended to apply to foreigners, who were not entering legally, or according to law.
          NO scholar except revisionists and lgbtqi websites, state it to apply to illegals.

        • floral

          No he did NOT “craft” the 14th amendment, and your sources are the specious outlier interpretation drawn by the “lgbtqi community” to justify their illogical irrational attempt to force lasful approval their sexual preferences. Stupid.

  • Paul Allen

    Celebrities need to keep their stupid mouths shut before “Action!” and after “Cut!”.

  • The Rev.

    Under the liberals understanding of the Constitution illegals have rights, and the U.S. Citizens none. Everything they do is never on placed for the State election. We have a run=away State Govt. We are in trouble. Pray for Justice.

  • Phyllis Schultz

    All these liberal judges need to be removed from the bench. They seem to think they can make the law whatever they want it to be. She should have been escorted right back across the border to have her abortion in Mexico. Illegal immigrants have no rights in the US. There is no reason for all of these abortions. There are many places in the US where a girl or woman can obtain B.C. very inexpensively, and in some cases free. There are very few instances where abortion may be the reasonable choice. Things like rape or a serious congenital abnormality, but many of these women are not taking care of their own bodies. It is physically harmful to a woman’s health having repeated abortions, not to mention the murder of the infant. People need to take responsibility for themselves.

  • Paul Anderson Ed.D.

    The founding fathers were well aware of the consequences of taking a life and other immorality practices.
    Ancient Rome paid dearly for sacrificing their children, and dumping them on the garbage dump. The callapse and downfall of the ancient Roman Empire, was the cost of taking a life, and sodomy. The Historians of that day, had much to say about these things. See – The writings of Pliny the younger..
    I can assure you of one thing: Those that support and take the life of children, are cursed with God’s judgment.

  • Jim P

    Build the wall and remove all illegals from this country would be a good start. Next we need to start enforcing the laws of this country as they are written and not how some liberal judge wants to bend the law. If these liberal judges can’t enforce the law as written then they need to be removed.

  • Jim P

    The girl is here ILLEGALLY, why was she not sent back to here home country for the abortion ?

  • Bob

    No worries mate, everything that man has screwed up will be straightened up by a much higher authority than these bozos that preside over these kangaroo courts . Everything , and I mean everything will be back to normal and those that screwed up the program on purpose will be shown the errors of their ways .

  • kassa1

    Our justice system or so call justice system has been hijacked by the communist globalist years ago, as we stood by and let them continue to destroy America. Just remember all those John children in uniform today or fighting for him losing battle because the enemy is within ! This is who they need to be going after and if they have any rogue officers that are pushing them left they should be brought down to, as they are a disgrace to all who died for this great nation!

  • John Douglas

    Nice job RINOS , why is this lunatic on the bench at all ?

  • Jim Read

    I’m against abortion but look at this case this way, one less citizen anchor baby, maybe just maybe that’s what the court was trying to do!.

  • jgfsmf

    Hey Alyssa. She’s not an immigrant. She’s an ILLEGAL immigrant!

  • August Berkshire

    The woman was being held in capitivity like a livestock breeding animal. Yes, this really is how Religious Right conservative men view women.

  • Jons_On

    It’s things like this that show just how mentally ill those on the left are. Abortion is not in the constitution at all. Neither is marriage, education, labor or agriculture. Where the left get their info is truly baffling. Take Maxine Waters for instance. That mental giant is proposing impeachment against Trump. For what? He has done absolutely zero to get impeached. The left are showing their true colors. One is that they want to take away American citizens rights starting with the 2nd amendment. Two, they make stuff up that is not in the constitution. Three they are sore losers and four they are a bunch of mentally ill people whose main desire is to control other people. To those on the left I say get the hell out of my life and my business.

  • William L. Ramsburg

    SO IT IS SAID DOESN’T MAKE IT SO!!!!

  • robert sanders

    fake bull shit news

  • Joe M

    It is really hard to wrap my mind around this utterly STUPID decision made by an utterly STUPID and GODLESS court. All I can say is…..If these UTTERLY STUPID decisions keep coming out of these UTTERLY STUPID and GODLESS courts and the UTTERLY STUPID judges don’t change their ways….one day they will stand before GOD and they aren’t going to like the RIGHTEOUS decision handed down by Him !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    P.S. There won’t be any appeal either!

  • Alleged-Comment

    The Constitution only applies to legal entities of the Constitution. Illegal immigrants are not her legal entities.

  • Keith

    Liberals are sick bastards, no doubt about it!

  • BatGuanna

    If you can find the Father cut him and this will not happen again, load up all of them and send them back where they came from! Is this an innocent child, what makes you think she was not forced or a working girl? Send them back (and family) to where they came from!!!!!!!!!!!!

  • Bird

    She’s illegal…. send her home to GET her abortion if she wants one. How stupid do our courts have to be to make these asinine rulings?

  • RufusVonDufus

    We must rid ourselves of all of these Federal judges who think they are gods! They are the biggest causes of most of our problems as they interpret our Constitution to their own liking. Get rid of every single O’vomit appointee!

  • Bella Gray

    She broke our laws escort her a** across the border and dump her back where ever the hell! the leach came from, and she can take all her spawn with her! I am sick to death of us always holding the damned bag for every lowlife that crawls over the border. Put up a machine gun patrol, and they can target practice, that will keep them the hell out.

  • Lakshmi

    There are many Satanic Globalist New World Order ORGANIZED CRIME SYNDICATE members sitting on judicial benches throughout our nation. The secret servants of Satan have VERY HEAVILY INFILTRATED our government. They are the Deep State Swamp creatures that, hopefully, can and will be purged from every governmental position.
    PRAY for all the secret servants of Satan to be removed from all positions of power, authority, influence, leadership, ownership and governmental positions everywhere throughout America and the world and BE REPLACED by God’s friends.

  • Bella Gray

    This is what their leaches cost us and you can blame the liberal courts and all the Communist Anti-American Democrats and even too many Republicans. This is exactly what the Democrats bring to every city and state they run. 🔥Illegal Aliens
    ALL ILLEGAL ALIENS NEED DEPORTED! Including the DACA, who incidentally the majority are grown adults, who had plenty of time to fix their problem and chose not to. Including children that were dumped over our borders as unaccompanied children, and those who ended up in gangs. Their parents didn’t want them, well we don’t either! Our laws are not confusing for anyone but a Communist Democrat and their supporters, and Paul Ryan! ALL ILLEGAL ALIENS ARE CRIMINALS.

    If illegal aliens are so great, let them go back to their own countries and make them great. Make it all they want to steal from Americans. I am so sick of these users and those anti-Americans who are fighting to abuse Americans. All bills down to the penny that these illegal aliens cost America should be put totally on the Communist Democrats who are fighting to keep them here. You would see how quickly they would back off.

    Send these DACA “kids” that we PAID to educate back to their own countries, so they can be a positive force on their countries. Let them contribute to rebuilding their country and STOP THEIR CITIZENS FOR STEALING INTO AMERICA!

    Immigration costs hit us on countless levels: whites don’t care what color the illegals are, they could be purple with two heads, and it would not be relevant. The objection is that as a debtor nation close to bankruptcy, illegals are a heavy burden we cannot afford and are not responsible for, as those people belong to foreign countries.

    Our struggling middle class is supporting everyone, and the illegal aliens never stop coming. We pay for the birth of their children and educate them clear through college, while our children are driven into massive debts for life for their educations. They are living off our welfare, our medical system, they drive up our rates on everything they don’t pay their fair share on, they are wear and tear on all our country’s infrastructure the list goes on and on.

    MON, NOV 7th
    A new authoritative study released by the National Academy of Sciences (NAS) reveals that the federal government would have to immediately raise taxes by $1.29 trillion in order to cover the fiscal losses created by those illegal aliens and their children who receive amnesty. This would also need an immediate lump sum of over $15,000 on average per household in order to cover the future costs. They also drive down wages for American citizens. Illegal aliens are the gift that never stops giving, hear my sarcasm.
    https://www.numbersusa.com/news/nas-study-reveals-amnesty-could-cost-taxpayers-129-trillion

    California for example is considered an illegal alien magnet with 34 percent of the nation’s welfare recipients. State and local spending on welfare programs in California are expected to reach $38.6 billion while the state’s long-term debt load approaches $500 billion. The business and tax climate in California is horrific and getting worse. In 2011, 73,000 companies both large and small – 5.2 percent of the 1.3 million total – fled the state in search of more business-friendly locales, or went belly up.

    Illegal immigrants are a major drain on our healthcare system. Some studies conclude that hospitals in the Southwest spend as much as 15% of their total budget providing care for people who shouldn’t even be in the United States. At a time when we’re already struggling to get health costs under control, this is nothing less than a national outrage.

    WARNING The Shocking Number of Illegals Stole Social Security Numbers | American Action News. We’ve all been warned about identity theft where thieves steal social security numbers to open credit cards under your name. Now there’s a new identity theft taking place you need to be on the look out for. A new report from the Washington Times says a shocking number of illegal immigrants have stolen social security numbers to steal American jobs.

    Most illegal immigrants who pay taxes have stolen someone else’s legal identity, and the IRS doesn’t do a very good job of letting those American citizens and legal immigrants know they’re being impersonated, the tax agency’s inspector general said in a new report released Thursday. The theft creates major problems for the American citizens and legal foreign workers whose identities are stolen, and who have to deal with explaining money they never earned. They are also driving down American wages!

    Yet the IRS only manages to identify half of the potentially 1.4 million people likely affected by the fraud in 2015, the Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration said in its report. Read more at http://americanactionnews.com/articles/warning-the-shocking-number-of-illegals-who-stole-social-security-numbers

    Furthermore they are bringing highly infectious disease epidemics: Polio, Leprosy, TB, Measles, Scarlet Fever, drug resistant Gonorrhea, Hepatitis A, to name but a few; because they were not inoculated from birth. Those coming from Africa, where 70% are infected, bring HIV/AIDs, a dreadfully deadly disease with massive exposurerisks and expense into America, and now Monkey Pox too. Then we have those from Syria bringing in a flesh eating disease that can take THREE YEARS to show itself.

    Moreover, those coming across the Mexican border, hundreds of thousand YEARLY are indeed rapists, murders, drug deals, and criminals. I checked the government stats on that myself. They are also ISIS, as the drug smugglers have told us they have been bring them in. Open borders are deadly to Americans and America.

    •According to statistics published by the Department of Justice this week (May 2017), nearly 1/4 of the U.S. federal prison population is comprised of foreigners – more than half of whom have deportation awaiting them when they complete their sentences. —Jessica Vaughan of the Center for Immigration Studies said the figures should shock any American who cares about enforcing U.S. law.

    They are destroying our national parks. A nonprofit group dedicated to protecting all native wild animals and plants has published a detailed report documenting how illegal immigrants crossing through the 350-mile Arizona-Mexico border have destroyed hundreds of acres of national forests and their habitat. American taxpayers will dish out $63 million to clean up 25 million pounds of trash and human waste left by illegal immigrants who cross through federal and state parks during their trek from Mexico to the U.S. In yet another solid argument for securing the southern border, American families planning to visit national parks are being warned of the imminent danger created by Mexican drug and immigrant smugglers. —Judicial Watch

    Also one cannot discount the fact that they are liars, cheats and thieves, when they break our laws to come here by cutting in front of all those legally coming to our country. Immigrating requires time, money, and good will. Those honorable people are what we look for, NOT those who show no respect for us, our laws or processes.

  • Sandra Schnabel

    It is bad judicial decisions. It is not interpretation of the constitution, they make up their own rules and laws. It should not be tolerated, but the deep state knew once they made their implants, per years of planning, that it would take anyone a long time to get them out.

  • Hildegarde

    That Judge needs to be fired. It is illegal to give a girl from another country an Abortion.

  • Donald Lindsey

    abortion is not spoken of in the Constitution, reread it

  • RC

    Just where in the U.S. Constitution does it say anything about abortion? Perhaps I missed something but having read that document several times I didn’t see anything about that. Our founding fathers probably didn’t even know about that sort of thing. Just another crooked thing the so called liberals in this country who are nothing but a bunch of Socialists (Communists) who pass themselves off as Democrats have dreamed up to screw things up for the people, both citizens and non citizens who’re here LEGALLY.

  • Max Thor

    These trash federal judges need to go….There is nothing in the constitution that says a federal judge is allowed to bypass the constitution. Another Obama appointee…TRASH

  • Since the constitution was purely a secular document, Jefferson urged Madison to include a Bill of rights, which was done.As such, we need to adhere to the Bill of Rights. But only the first amendment deals with matters of religion. None touch on abortion. Therefore the rights of people take precedent. Thus the constitution is not without flaw. Christians know that but there is not much we can do except stand on our Biblical principles. That principle is that God alone has the rights to birth and death. Humans do not.

  • Stephan W Shook

    The constitution says all foreign invaders are subject to to being taken care of by all citizens and all lawyers cannot hold any office of trust. Judges are nothing but sleazy lawyers in a robe.

  • Dave Nettles

    I think Illegal’s have a right to only ONE service. A free ride home.

  • Margaret Taylor

    I just want to ask the Obama judge if she is the one who paid for the abortion. It sure as heck should not have been paid for by the tax paying CITIZENS of this country.

  • Bud William

    Don’t forget, Liberal Courts can enshrine anything that makes them feel great and powerful.Even if it is wrong. Today Liberal Judges are even able to glide back in time to speak with the framers of the Constitution. Making sure the Framers meant to include all Liberal Court Decisions.

  • RockyMtn1776

    The REAL Problem is that American citizens tolerate this sort of thing instead of going after our elected officials who not only allow but legislate laws giving illegals any rights at all ! Illegal aliens have NO rights.

2018 TotalConservative.com