• Megan

    Google is paying 97$ per hour,with weekly payouts.You can also avail this.
    On tuesday I got a great new Land Rover Range Rover from having earned $11752 this last four weeks..with-out any doubt it’s the most-comfortable job I have ever done .. It sounds unbelievable but you wont forgive yourself if you don’t check it
    !da286:
    ➽➽
    ➽➽;➽➽ http://GoogleOnlineEasySaleTechJobsOpportunities/easy/jobs ★✫★★✫★✫★★✫★✫★★✫★✫★★✫★✫★★✫★✫★★✫★✫★★✫★✫★★✫★✫★★✫★✫★★✫★✫:::::!da286luuuu

  • Elizabeth

    Google is paying 97$ per hour,with weekly payouts.You can also avail this.
    On tuesday I got a great new Land Rover Range Rover from having earned $11752 this last four weeks..with-out any doubt it’s the most-comfortable job I have ever done .. It sounds unbelievable but you wont forgive yourself if you don’t check it
    !da270d:
    ➽➽
    ➽➽;➽➽ http://GoogleCashOfficeCareerPartTimeJobs/get/hourly ★✫★★✫★✫★★✫★✫★★✫★✫★★✫★✫★★✫★✫★★✫★✫★★✫★✫★★✫★✫★★✫★✫★★✫★✫:::::!da270uuuu

  • Michael Dennewitz

    Our Lord Jesus must have tears in his eyes as he looks down at what WE’VE done to destroy what perfection he created. I don’t blame the so-called “transgenders” at all. I blame the fully grown people who have done their best to convince little kids that their gender is not correct. Little kids that haven’t even learned how to effectively wipe their own butts, and an adult convinces them that they actually aren’t right. GOD HAVE PITY ON YOUR SOULS! 😣🙁☹😢😭

    • Rattlerjake

      God saw the same thing right before he destroyed Sodom and Gomorrah. The cities have resorted to everything that violates God’s law. God knew this was coming, that is why he gave us his prophesy, so we KNOW what is coming. Remember God/Jesus said:

      Tell us, when shall these things be? and what shall be the sign of thy coming, and of the end of the world?
      And Jesus answered and said unto them, Take heed that no man deceive you.

      False Christs
      For many shall come in my name, saying, I am Christ; and shall deceive many.
      And ye shall hear of wars and rumours of wars: see that ye be not troubled: for all these things must come to pass, but the end is not yet.
      For nation shall rise against nation, and kingdom against kingdom: and there shall be famines, and pestilences, and earthquakes, in divers places.
      All these are the beginning of sorrows.

      Witnessing to All Nations

      Then shall they deliver you up to be afflicted, and shall kill you: and ye shall be hated of all nations for my name’s sake.
      And then shall many be offended, and shall betray one another, and shall hate one another.
      And many false prophets shall rise, and shall deceive many.
      And because iniquity shall abound, the love of many shall wax cold.
      But he that shall endure unto the end, the same shall be saved.

      • Kel57

        Wake up people!

      • rocky63

        The Sodom and Gomorrah parallel is VERY INTERESTING and, I think, QUITE ACCURATE. The people in those towns had chosen to ignore the laws of decent living and took to all kinds of sexual, and other, depravity. We are watching the same thing happen in the USA, with much of the impetus for this destructive trend coming from the LGBTXXXYYYZZZ communities, including those who claim to be of a gender different than their bodies show them to be and including those who want to be thought of as cats, racoons, mice, ponies, wolves, worms, butterflies and anything else their warped minds choose to claim to be.

        • Rattlerjake

          OH contrare! The homosexual deviancy agenda is minuscule to the destruction that has already occurred and is still coming. This has been the agenda of the Jesuits and Zionists for hundreds of years. Civilization took the first real hit when the Romans created Catholicism and then the “theories” of creation were created to remove God from the equation. The theory of evolution has been used to justify the mixing of negros and whites, claiming that negros are a “race” of man (they are NOT, they are behemah), when God clearly warned us of mixing with them. It has continued with feminism, where women are considered “equal” and filling men’s positions, there is abortion, the laxing of punishments for crimes (especially violent crimes), the worship of false gods/religions, and worship of money, and the lying/bearing false witness …..

          • rocky63

            Ah, a new level of incredible stupidity has joined the list of comments. Rattlerjake, you are really twisted, sport. Negroes are not a “race” — apparently that means to you that they are not even human. Only and idiot could combine all the garbage in your post. So you see Jesuits and Zionists as partners in evil??? And you are so incredibly stupid as to think the Romans created Catholicism. Neither Peter, nor Paul, nor Mark, nor Matthew, nor Jesus were Romans. Get a brain somewhere. If you can only afford a third rate brain, that will at least be much better than what you now are using.

          • Rattlerjake

            “Neither Peter, nor Paul, nor Mark, nor Matthew, nor Jesus were Romans”, they weren’t catholics either, and although they were of Hebrew lineage they didn’t follow Judaism either. Your point has no value.
            It’s obvious that you don’t have a clue how zionists have hijacked Christianity through catholicism and several denominational Christian religions; especially after the holocaust. Christian zionism is rampant in the US.

          • LeaM

            Your post contains MORE UNQUESTIONABLE ERRORS THAN ANY I have seen on this website, or anywhere else, for that matter. DO THEY GIVE AWARDS FOR SHEER STUPIDITY? If so, you have WON one big time, no competition!

            Paul, Matthew, Peter, and Mark WERE HEBREWS. In those days one’s religion was CLOSELY tied to one’s ethnicity, so the FACT that they were Hebrews means THEY DID FOLLOW JUDAISM. At least until they were converted (except Mark; he was later) by Christ.

            Find me ANYTHING in Scripture that says “negroes” are NOT of the lineage of Adam. “Adam” does NOT mean “skin that blushes”; it’s a HEBRAIC NAME. It DOES mean “to be red” or “red-skinned,” but that would be pretty unexceptional when you’re talking about someone from the Middle East, where members of the Semitic race (including BOTH Jews and Gentiles) OFTEN have reddish skin.
            I
            BTW, you IDIOT: if Adam was the FIRST MAN, ALL RACES MUST by definition be DESCENDED FROM ADAM. Or do you suppose God pulled off another Creation over in the next county? Or in what is now Malawi, or maybe Pakistan? If “God created Man in His own Image, Male and Female created HE him,” then ALL men (all HUMANS) are the children of God. RACE has absolutely NOTHING to do with it.

          • Rattlerjake

            You can argue with me all you want, but scripture (GOD) is what you are actually arguing with. Behemah were created before man. People like you are the ones that NEVER use your mind to do the research, you ALWAYS rely on so called experts to feed you information. God told us to READ HIS WORD and if you spent ONE minute of your time actually reading it you’d find many lies being told by the church.

            Ignorant fools like you (who actually think they are “good” Christians) immediately think that just because negros are not of man’s ancestry that it is hatred or bigotry, when it is neither. It is simply understanding God’s creation, instead of man’s claims! God was very explicit “And if a man lie with a beast, he shall surely be put to death: and ye shall slay the beast. 16And
            if a woman approach unto any beast, and lie down thereto, thou shalt kill the woman, and the beast: they shall surely be put to death; their blood shall be upon them. If you think he meant a four legged animal you are an idiot, four legged animals DO NOT LAY DOWN TO BREED! Another verse says – Neither
            shalt thou lie with any beast to defile thyself therewith: neither
            shall any woman stand before a beast to lie down thereto: it [is]
            confusion. Notice she stands before the beast then lays down with it. That is NOT a four legged animal.

            You’re probably one of those idiots that think that just because you repent/ believe in Jesus that you will have everlasting life; well if you read further he tells you that if you do not believe in his word that you do not know him. You can’t believe in God/Jesus and ignore his word!

            There is a reason that Jesus told us that in the end times “you will be hated because of my name” – because people are being deceived, lied to, indoctrinated with the lies of satan through man. Do you believe in homosexual marriage? It has already been accepted in most states, and will soon be accepted across the globe (even the current pope has come out with acceptance), just as women in leadership positions in the church which God/Jesus said was wrong; Just like divorce, abortion, and premarital sex have been almost completely accepted – even by Christians. Mixing with behemah is no different. The lies have been taught in school and told for so long that they have been accepted as the truth. What YOU have failed miserably at is that you didn’t even read what was provided. It contains the verses and the explanations of those verses, not misinterpretations!

            When you deny God because you are worried what man will think, Jesus said, “I never knew you”!

            Matthew 7:21-23New King James Version (NKJV)
            21 “Not everyone who says to Me, ‘Lord, Lord,’ shall enter the kingdom of heaven, but he who does the will of My Father in heaven. 22 Many will say to Me in that day, ‘Lord, Lord, have we not prophesied in Your name, cast out demons in Your name, and done many wonders in Your name?’ 23 And then I will declare to them, ‘I never knew you; depart from Me, you who practice lawlessness!’

            Do you understand what that “lawlwessness” is? It is going against God’s laws which is what many “Christians” are doing by listening to the lies instead of trusting in God and following his word! Many church leaders are doing this exact thing – they are casting out demons, prophesied, and other wonders in his name, BUT they are NOT teaching his word they are conforming to man’s laws and claims. Why do you think that “preachers”, Sunday school teachers, etc. always teach the SAME parables and stories, and give the same sermons OVER AND OVER, and yet they avoid many parts of the Bible. The church dictates what they teach and how they teach it! People like Osteen are nothing but motivational speakers using Christianity to rake in MONEY; money the spend on frivolous luxury like cars, houses, jets, vacations – that is GOD’s money to do God’s work. Many of the people that give that money are living paycheck to paycheck, while the ‘Osteens’ live in luxury. Go back and look through every one of Osteen’s “sermons” and you’ll see nothing but repeats of the same – HE NEVER TALKS ABOUT ANYTHING THAT IS CONTROVERSIAL OR AGAINST THE SOCIETAL NORM!

            By the way, what you said about “red-skinned” is EXACTLY what I said, but you are reinterpreting it to make it fit your mindset. Blushing skin is seeing the blood through the skin – that is what happens when you are in the sun for a long time or work hard, the blood comes up to the surface to help cool the body – that is what the “blushing-skin” means. It is where the southern term “Red Neck” came from, the reddening of the skin from sun exposure or hard work – because back then they wore clothing and only their head and neck were exposed. Negros do NOT SHOW REDNESS because their skin is biologically different. There is a permanent layer of melanin in their skin that prevents seeing the blood coming to the surface.

          • LeaM

            I don’t WANT to argue with you,. because arguing with a brick wall is a waste of time — and that’s what your mind is made of.
            I’ve FORGOTTEN more Scripture than YOU will ever learn, and I still remember most of what I learned in school.

            Please do not bother me with more of your rants. You don’t make sense and your comprehension of God’s Word is microscopic. I don’t have time (or the inclination, frankly) to educate you, and you clearly NEED educating. BADLY.

          • Rattlerjake

            Exactly the typical reply from someone that cannot justify their side or prove the other side is wrong. It’s always: “I’ve FORGOTTEN more than YOU will ever learn” and: “I don’t have time (or the inclination, frankly) to educate you, and you clearly NEED educating. BADLY.” It’s as simple as YOU CAN’T prove me wrong because scripture doesn’t lie!

            What is sad is that satan has been able to poison so many which makes prophesy correct that “many will be deceived” and “wide is the gate, and broad is the way, that leadeth to destruction, and MANY there be which go in thereat: Because strait is the gate, and narrow is the way, which leadeth unto life, and FEW there be that find it.”

            I may be a brick wall, but I refuse to be indoctrinated with lies that you and so many weak-minded fools are accepting. There are none so blind as those who will not see!

          • LeaM

            I can justify my position, but I don’t choose to WASTE
            MY TIME justifying it to YOU, and you very likely wouldn’t understand it, anyway. Just because you can (MIS)quote Scripture doesn’t mean you actually KNOW anything. Now GET OUT OF MY LIFE. I will not respond to further posts from you because (as Nick says, below) “You are a totally uneducated MORON” with a sick mind.

          • LeaM

            You can disagree with me if you like, but I’ll bet I have done a LOT more STUDYING of the subject than YOU have. To say “people like (me) don’t use their minds (you think I got a Ph.D. in Biblical Studies out of a Cracker Jax box?) or call me an “ignorant fool” only displays YOUR OWN IGNORANCE. Now please go peddle your dubious wares somewhere else. I KNOW I’m not interested and from the reaction from other posters, I don’t think THEY are, either.
            I have NO idea what faith you claim or church you attend (IF ANY), but you are presumably aware that there are NUMEROUS Christian faiths. Although history shows us many unfortunate conflicts between or among them, in recent centuries we have learned to get along — UNTIL CONFRONTED BY A TOTAL BIGOT LIKE YOU, who left to your own devices could probably launch a new Crusade. Fortunately, NOBODY WOULD FOLLOW YOUR BANNER and the whole thing would END rather quickly with YOUR destruction.

          • Rattlerjake

            All I hear from you is your supposed expertise, which of course ANY internet troll can claim, add to that how you insist that you can “educate” me but it is a waste of time or you don’t have the time. The truth is that you CAN’T prove me wrong, because scripture is as plain as the ignorant look on your face! Scripture doesn’t lie, but you will deny God before you will accept his word and be considered a bigot by MAN! I am open to anyone who can prove what I have said is false, but for the last two years of providing this information NOT ONE PERSON has done so!

            You are the equivalent of Bruce Jenner, who after reassignment surgery claims to be a woman, but no matter how hard you believe it, YOUR CHROMOSOMES CAN’T BE CHANGED AND THEY DON’T LIE!

          • Nick

            You are a totally uneducated MORON! Your mind is sick and twisted and you need serious medical attention.

          • rocky63

            RattlerJake — put the words where your roving brain is and give an example of some of those 100 Biblical verses that supposedly spoke about a bi-pedal beast that wears sack cloth, is told not to touch the altar, etc.

            Peter, Paul, Mark, Matthew were of course not Catholics. They were CHRISTIANS. And Christianity became the Catholic Church. Over the centuries, of course, many other forms of Christianity appeared in a number of denominations. But the ROMANS DID NOT CREATE CATHOLICISM, as you so erroneously claimed. Look at Paul’s epistles in the Bible and see how many Christian groups he addressed, in Ephesus, Thessalonica, Corinth, Philippi, Colosse, and Rome.

            There is no intelligent source anywhere (which, of course, you would not be part of) which claims that Rome invented Catholicism. Apparently you are unaware of the hundreds of Christians who were killed by Romans for their beliefs — those Christian beliefs grew into several forms of Christianity of which the first was Catholicism. To claim that Rome invented Catholicism is just downright stupid.

          • Rattlerjake

            Jonah 3:7-8 And he caused it to be proclaimed and published through Nineveh by the decree of the king and his nobles, saying, Let neither man nor beast, herd nor flock, taste any thing: let them not feed, nor drink water: But let man and beast (behemah) be covered with sackcloth, and cry mightily unto God: yea, let them turn every one from his evil way, and from the violence that [is] in their hands.

            SO what “beast” do you know that can be covered in clothing, cry mightily to God, turn from evil ways and violence in their hands? NO ANIMAL ON THIS PLANET meets that description other than behemah (negros)!

            If you go to the link that I provided, it gives you many of the verses, it gives a detailed explanation of the different words in Hebrew that were ALL translated to “beast” in English (because there was no other word for negros), and it gives explanation for it’s meaning.

            And if you are really so ignorant on the emergence of the ROMAN CATHOLIC CHURCH there is absolutely NO HOPE FOR YOU! Christianity did NOT BECOME the catholic church, the catholic church was a form of Christianity that branched off in the ROMAN EMPIRE and was recognized as the FIRST STATE CHURCH OF ROME! Romans persecuted and killed many CHRISTIANS but not those who converted to catholism. Roman catholicism was adopted by other countries to ally themselves with the papacy and the monasteries. Catholicism isn’t true Christianity, all you have to do is spend some time researching, there are thousands of sites and references that explain why catholicism is a fake Christian religion that violates God’s laws!

            Here’s ONE – https://www.jashow.org/articles/guests-and-authors/dr-john-ankerberg/should-roman-catholicism-be-considered-a-christian-religion/

            “There are none so blind as those who cannot see”!

          • rocky63

            You go even deeper into ignorance than I had thought possible. You can’t name a single denomination of Christianity that preceded the Catholic Church in existence. Christian denominations are groups that chose to leave the Catholic Church.

          • John Redman

            UNchurched Gnostics preceded the HRC by a WEEEEEEE few years.

          • rocky63

            That is so. But what’s the point? They weren’t Crhistians and certainly weren’t Catholics.

          • John Redman

            Too bad, but they WERE Christians. Commie Christians, to be sure. Acts Christians without a doubt. Misguided Christians, painfully so, but not more so than the current Pope who IS Catholic.

          • LeaM

            Gnostics were an early branch of Christianity. They were LIKE communists because they believed in community ownership of everything (I think they were willing to allow private ownership of a person’s clothing — usually ONE robe each — but that’s about it).
            However, it is just plain STUPID to say they WERE “Commies.”
            Communism is an ECONOMIC philosophy (NOT a moral philosophy) that wasn’t developed until the NINETEENTH CENTURY, by Karl Marx. The Gnostics had come and gone CENTURIES earlier, of course — 19 centuries earlier, to be precise.

            Pope Francis’s problem is that he grew up, became a priest, and spent his ecclesiastical career in Argentina, which (like much of Latin America, sadly) never quite got a handle on free markets. He does’t “get” the idea that where people have the freedom to work and create their own wealth, they will almost ALWAYS create greater wealth and spread it more widely than will people in societies that offer no such opportunity. (Argentina has had a particularly bad record in this regard, combining an insistence on stratified markets with toleration for a privileged class (usually related to the dictator of the moment). I think we should pray that Pope Francis’s wider exposure to the world will bring him to understand how much more efficient (to say nothing of FREER) market economies can be. Maybe he’s too old to learn, but prayer CAN work miracles.

          • John Redman

            Gee, thanks for the history/economics/current events lesson. I guess that you are much smarter than I. I didn’t even realize that “commie” can only mean Communist until you informed this discussion of that “fact”. But then, we Irish always WERE dumber than a box of rocks (must be as we allowed the ‘wonderful’ brits (spit) to destroy Brehon Law). Bottom line, though, everything I wrote is true and you agree but want to nitpick things I didn’t even write. BTW, Gnostics still exist F.I. in Egypt and cells across the globe.

          • Rattlerjake

            I never said there were any previous “denominations”. Christianity existed before the denomination called “catholicism”, and non-denominational Christianity still exists! The theology of catholicism doesn’t follow true Christianity, and violates God’s law, just as most other denominations do!

          • rocky63

            And, please tell — How does Catholicism fail to follow true Christianity? What law of God does Catholicism violate?

          • Rattlerjake

            Proverbs –
            Answer not a fool according to his folly, lest thou also be like unto him.
            Answer a fool according to his folly, lest he be wise in his own conceit.
            As a dog returneth to his vomit, so a fool returneth to his folly.
            Fools have no interest in understanding; they only want to air their own opinions.
            Spouting off before listening to the facts is both shameful and foolish.

            Wise men speak because they have something to say; Fools because they have to say something. (Plato)

            Since you obviously are a fool, this will be my last reply to you ignorance. I provided a link that you obviously ignored, it explains in detail and with the appropriate scripture that shows why the catholic church is NOT a representation of Christianity, here it is again: https://www.jashow.org/articles/guests-and-authors/dr-john-ankerberg/should-roman-catholicism-be-considered-a-christian-religion/

          • LeaM

            Judaism may violate CHRISTIAN doctrines and scripture because JEWS ARE NOT CHRISTIANS. Their faith was 3,000 YEARS OLD before Christ was BORN, never mind the “church universal” being established. It would be MORE ACCURATE to say that CHRISTIANITY VIOLATES JEWISH DOCTRINE AND SCRIPTURES, because Judaism is BY FAR the older faith. But I don’t expect a BIGOTED IDIOT like yourself to take note of THAT minor detail.

          • LeaM

            Most of what you say is very good, but you’re DEAD WRONG in saying that “the Romans killed many CHRISTIANS but not those who converted to Catholicism.” That’s sheer nonsense. First, the word “catholic” MEANS “UNIVERSAL,” and came into use precisely to DEFINE CHRISTIANITY AS A UNIVERSAL FAITH. The term “Roman Catholic” first came into use as early as A.D.107, but wasn’t widely used until after Constantine decreed the whole Roman Empire should become Christian, which was in A.D. 312.

            The Romans killed Christians with wanton disregard for the precise definition of their sect, but while there were numerous differences among those sects, there actually WERE NO CHRISTIANS WHO WERE NOT “ROMAN CATHOLICS” — at least not until the Reformation (the generally accepted “start date” for which was 1517, when Martin Luther wrote his 95 Theses (we just observed the 500th anniversary of their publication). Until Luther’s Theses, Christianity was indeed “CATHOLIC” in the sense of being UNIVERSAL (of course, in the world they knew at the time, “universal” meant, at the most, stretching from the Holy Land west to what are now Spain and Portugal).

            Ironically, considering the wars of the Reformation, Luther wasn’t actually trying to launch an alternative to Catholicism under the Protestant banner; he just wanted the Pope and bishops to stop selling indulgences (free passes to Heaven) and relying on the proceeds from such sales to build or refurbish Christianity’s growing number of cathedrals. He STILL considered himself (and all other Christians) to be a Catholic. So did Henry VIII of England, who wrenched England OUT of the “universal” Catholic Church, but a few years earlier had written “A DEFENSE OF THE SEVEN SACRAMENTS” to COUNTER Luther and reinforce papal authority.

          • NotJim

            “If you can only afford a third rate brain”

            Or perhaps, a refurbished one?

          • Linda Shelton

            God split the people and the languages for a reason. He also made two sex’s for a reason. If you can’t understand that, you have a real problem. Black people are just as much a race as white ones, brown ones, or red ones. You saying it is not doesn’t NOT make it so!!!

          • Rattlerjake

            You’re brainwashed and refusing to listen to what GOD himself told us in scripture. Nowhere in the Bible does it say anything about races of people. You assume that causing people to speak different languages that it means race – BALONEY! All of the “white” “races” speak different languages (Hebrew, Arabic, Spanish, German, English, etc.) but are the same color; negros never spoke a written language until whites taught them their languages. The Bible distinguished people by geographical region and nationality, but NEVER BY RACE because there are NO RACES! There are Jews, Gentiles, and Greeks, Philistines, Cushites, Ethiopians, etc. THERE ARE NO RACES! By the way, Ethiopian is NOT a country when referred to in the Bible; Ethiopia was a huge geographical area that covered central and southern africa (africa didn’t exist by name when the Bible was written) and parts of the lower middle east – look at ancient biblical maps! Jesus said there will be deceivers that will come in his name and MANY will follow. YOU are listening to the doctrine of satan from the teachings of man! Prove me wrong!
            GOD SAID IT – THAT MAKES IT SO !!!!!!!!!!!!!
            Instead of opening your mouth and showing your ignorance, read what I provided.

          • LeaM

            Well, if “God said it, that makes it so!” is true, then the REVERSE MUST ALSO BE TRUE: What God DID NOT SAY is NOT TRUE. Now God didn’t say a WORD about the Internet: does that mean we’re all typing our hearts out for messages that will just zoom around outer space? What about CARS? Space vehicles? GOD DIDN’T MENTION ANY OF THOSE THINGS, EITHER.

            There ARE mentions of various “tribes” in the Bible — that’s what the people of THAT TIME called “RACES.” How else do you suppose Moses got to be a Hebrew and, say (just to pick a story everyone knows) Herod, his wife Herodias, and Herodias’s daughter Salome (who demanded the beheading of John the Baptist, Jesus’s COUSIN — obviously a member of the same race) The TRANSLATORS of the Bible (Greeks, if you’re interested) didn’t use the WORD for “race,” but they couldn’t possibly have been talking about ANYTHING ELSE.

            BTW, ETHIOPIA IS a country referred to in the Bible BY NAME. The Queen of Sheba was FROM what is now Ethiopia. Or is SHE not in YOUR copy of the Good Book? Ethiopia is ALSO mentioned in connection with the escape of Moses and the Hebrews from bondage under the Pharaoh (Egyptian ruler), but it’s late and I’m too tired to look it up.

            I don’t quarrel with your religious beliefs (first, I don’t know what the Hell they ARE; you’ve GARBLED about TEN DIFFERENT RELIGIOUS PRINCIPLES; and second, I don’t quarrel with ANYONE’S religious beliefs. You’re entitled to whatever believes you wish to embrace — HOWEVER IDIOTIC. But because a word DOESN’T APPEAR in the Bible (WHICH IS A TRANSLATION, you jackass: NONE of the modern versions were WRITTEN IN ENGLISH!) But FACTS ARE FACTS, especially when EVERY MAJOR RELIGION ACCEPTS THEM. Maybe you’d better stop worrying about WORDS NOT MENTIONED in the Bible and think a bit MORE ABOUT IDEAS THAT ARE IN
            FACT MENTIONED, OFTEN AND PROMINENTLY.

          • Rattlerjake

            Neither God nor Jesus mentioned what types of furniture or wagons in ancient times either, he didn’t explain how to put diapers on a child, or rigging on sailing ships, or luxuries of the rich of the time. The Bible is Not about those types of specifics because it is NOT meant to be an encyclopedia. The Bible is a brief overview of creation and what God intended for us.

            Ethiopia was a geographical area, not a “country” as we know it today. Try looking at an ancient map. The Herodotus map shows that in ancient times Ethiopia covered the entire southern portion of where Africa and southern middle east was. The more modern map shows it further broken down but still a huge geographical area. http://www.geocurrents.info/historical-geography/the-migration-of-place-names-africa-libya-ethiopia-eritrea-and-sudan

            Tribes were NOT races, the 12 tribes, for example all came from the same lineage, so they were not races – tribes were of different beliefs/ethnicities.

            And it is obvious you are groping for straws with the “words not found in the bible” meme! I only mentioned that certain words were not used in the Bible or available as translations because it gives you an understanding of WHY and WHAT words WERE/WEREN’T AVAILABLE and used to describe what we know by something different.

            What I see, is so many of you, pseudo-Christians that will go to your gave believing in what you have been told instead of what the Bible actually tells you; no different than denominational Christians who only believe in parts of scripture that “their” denomination teaches, but refuse to accept or deliberately misinterpret the rest to fit their beliefs.

          • LeaM

            In Biblical times there WERE only tribal areas, not “countries” in the sense we use the term today. THAT much of what you said is true, but the rest is pure, racist GARBAGE.
            As it happens, I HAVE read the Bible in SEVERAL translations, including both ancient GREEK and ARAMAIC (the language Christ actually SPOKE. You have had the misfortune of encountering a SCHOLAR here, and if I wanted to waste my time I could shoot down EVERY ONE of your absurd assertions. But I don’t feel like devoting the time or energy to the task

          • Rattlerjake

            Right, so you can read Aramaic, Hebrew, Greek and I’m sure you have lakefront property for sale in the middle of the Sahara desert. Talk is cheap and you’re doing nothing more than talking out of your sphincter! Come on Mr. Scholar shoot down every one of my absurd assertions. Lets start with the words that are translated to beast:
            There are eight different Hebrew and Greek words, behemah, b’iyr, ziyz, chay, cheyva’, trephah, nephesh, and ktenos, are all translated into the one English word “beast”, but they each have different meanings in the original Hebrew and Greek languages which were lost in the translation into English.

            The Hebrew word “behemah” [#929] is translated 136 times as “beasts” and 57 times as “cattle”. It describes “beasts” who can cry mightily to God, who can turn away from evil, who wear sackcloth, who are circumcised, who can lie down with a woman to have sex with her, who have a conscience, who are put to death for violating God’s Law, who have possessions which can be sold or redeemed, who hold authority which can be taken away, who have feet and hands, who are inhabitants of cities, who God threatens to crossbreed with Israelites and Judahites, who can be hired, who are kept in tents, and who have boils on their bodies, none of which any four legged animal on the planet is capable of.

            So exactly what two-legged animal was he talking about?

          • LeaM

            I told you I am NOT going to waste any time on your nonsense. So STOP POSTING TO ME, because I will NOT respond and you’ll be wasting YOUR time (not mine: I won’t even READ your posts again).

          • Rattlerjake

            So it’s final, another fool who is nothing but talk and no substance. A fake “scholar” who can’t even answer a simple question. You’re no different that the entire leftist party with their constant lies and no truth.

          • LeaM

            You didn’t ASK a “simple question.” You RANTED on for paragraphs about a hundred different points of religious doctrine, emanating from several different religions, but apparently thinking it all came from one fundamentalist version of the Christian Bible. It DOESN’T, but maybe your preacher planted the confusion in you mind so I will just leave you to think whatever you like. IF you had ASKED “ONE SIMPLE QUESTION” I might have been willing to take the time and effort to answer it, but your rants are unanswerable because THEY DON’T MAKE SENSE.

            As for my familiarity with ancient Biblical languages, sorry, but I happen to have been (a) very interested in Biblical history and (b) good at languages. Since Aramaic, Hebrew, and Greek (the latter two in their ancient form, not the modern languages spoken in
            Israel or Greece) are fairly closely related, it’s NOT beyond human endeavor to learn all three. So sorry (not!) if my education befuddles you.

          • Rattlerjake

            Again you claim you will not respond any further, leftist lies.

            Actually I did ask a simple question – “So exactly what two-legged animal was he talking about?” The so called “rant” you refer to explained in detail what the scripture says and pertained directly to the question asked. So sorry that YOU are unable to concentrate on ONE subject at a time!

            You claim in your other comments that “As for my familiarity with ancient Biblical languages, sorry, but I happen to have been (a) very interested in Biblical history and (b) good at languages.” What is true is that you may “have been very interested in Biblical history and good at languages” doesn’t mean you KNOW biblical history or understand the original language. I speak four languages, besides English, and I know that word meanings and uses change over very short periods of time and many words or phrases, in one language, do NOT have a direct
            translation to other languages, even different dialects. IF you understoooooood that, YOU wouldn’t show so much stupidity in your comments!

          • James Hopkins

            “For God so loved the world” That means all people groups!!!

          • Rattlerjake

            I Didn’t say anywhere that God didn’t/doesn’t love the world. God loves ALL of his creation! Nowhere did I say that God doesn’t love behemah – what scripture does say is that God punished both man AND behemah with pestilence, boils, famine, and even death when they were guilty of violating his law! There are no verses where God punished cattle, fowl of the air, or creeping things (all animals).
            Jonah 3:7-8 And he caused it to be proclaimed and published through Nineveh by the decree of the king and his nobles, saying, Let neither man nor beast, herd nor flock, taste any thing: let them not feed, nor drink water: But let man and beast be covered with sackcloth, and cry mightily unto God: yea, let them turn every one from his evil way, and from the violence that [is] in their hands.

            SO what “beast” do you know that can be covered in clothing, dry mightily to God, turn from evil ways and violence in their hands? NO ANIMAL ON THIS PLANET meets that description other than behemah (negros)!

          • LeaM

            Well, that statement COULD apply to ANY HUMAN of ANY RACE. But you’re such a racist bigot that you’re determined to apply it only to the racial objects of your bigotry. Just READING your foul garbage makes my skin crawl: I WILL NOT respond any further.

          • Rattlerjake

            I see that you are a blatant liar also, considering how many times you have said you will not respond further. But as long as you catholics confess to MAN (instead of God/Jesus), you think it is OK!

            What statement are you referring to that could apply to any “race”? This one? SO what “beast” do you know that can be covered in clothing, dry mightily to God, turn from evil ways and violence in their hands? Actually NO, it cannot apply to ANY “race”. It can only apply to behemah which is NOT of the lineage of “MAN”. We know from scripture that God created Adam, the word Adam means reddish, ruddy, or blushing skin, and we know that God created Adam in HIS OWN IMAGE! Negros are the only “creature” on this earth that fits what God told us about behemah, They look nothing like whites, their skin does not blush the can wail mightily to God, they wear “sackcloth, etc. Only a fool that refuses to accept scripture would see otherwise.

          • LeaM

            That’s RIDICULOUS. Neither the Catholic Church, the Jesuits (Order of the Society of Jesus), or ANY Zionist group have EVER endorsed gender reassignment. You can hate anyone you want to hate, but GET SERIOUS. ANYONE hearing you accuse the Jesuits, Zionists, or even feminists as a group of such goals would call the men in white coats and HAVE YOU LOCKED UP.

            And they would be RIGHT TO DO SO.

          • Murphmeister

            I had a Jesuit education and a course in Christian marriage. I never heard a single word from them other than orthodox biblical teachings on sex and marriage. Rattler is just spewing hate.

            As for races, I believe there is only one race, the human race and that we all came out of Africa about 60-70,000 years ago. Some stayed put, some flew east, some flew west and the Irish flew over the cuckoo’s nest. That’s why they are impervious to psychoanalysis.

          • LeaM

            LOL!

          • Rattlerjake

            What you show is that you have zero understanding of God or Christianity. Considering that the Bible says the earth is but around 7000 years old, I see the Jesuits taught you well, considering they don’t follow God’s law either!

          • John “Kahless” Taylor

            OMG! Are you serious? I know you don’t think much about science but 7000 years is ridiculous. Oh, but I forgot, you believe blacks (I am black) are beasts.

          • Rattlerjake

            We have already established that YOU do not believe in God/ Jesus. It is scripture that tells us the approximate age of the earth. So far MAN has continued to change the theory of it’s age just as they continue to change the distance from here to the sun. There is NOT ONE shred of physical evidence that proves the earth is more that what scripture says. And as far as me believing that blacks are “beasts”, you again are incorrect. What I said was that the TRANSLATION TO ENGLISH used the word beast (because there wasn’t a direct translation for behemah to English), and that scripture disproves the fallacy of negros being in the ancestry of whites. If you knew anything about language, there is not always an exact translation for some words or phrases, and the word negro did not exist then. Additionally, there are substantial physical/biological characteristics that prove negros are NOT of the same ancestry as whites (those characteristics are less prominent in hybrids/mulattoes).
            Furthermore this information in no way justifies treating blacks as “animals”, but it does help explain WHY blacks are far more prone to commit crimes, especially violent crimes – “it is the nature of the beast”.

          • Rattlerjake

            Exactly where did I say anything about “gender reassignment “? But to be precise, the current Pope has endorsed same-sex marriage! https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/pope-francis-quietly-affirms-homosexual-civil-unions-contrary-to-catholic-t

          • LeaM

            That’s not quite accurate. The Pope (NOT speaking “ex cathedra,” but just FOR HIMSELF) “signaled support” for LEGAL (NOT church) recognition of “SAME-SEX CIVIL UNIONS” (NOT the same thing as “MARRIAGE.”

            In other words, the Pope said HE PERSONALLY (but NOT as Pope) could support allowing the LAW in various countries to recognize CIVIL UNIONS (but NOT marriages) between gay couples. This is somewhat like the Catholic Church saying (some years ago) that Catholics who had obtained CIVIL (legal) DIVORCES could for the first time be REMARRIED by a Catholic priest (only under certain circumstances, but it was still a big leap — whether forward or backward depends on one’s own perspective).

            Since the whole argument now is over whether gay couples can ONLY enter into civil unions (be united BY A JUDGE, not by a priest/minister/rabbi or even imam) or actually GET MARRIED (be united by a member of the clergy or some similar officiant), the Pope’s pronouncement DOESN’T CHANGE ANYTHING. It might clarify the rules for some who were confused, or just pretending they understood the rules to be different.

            “Gender reassignment” means the same thing as “sex-change,” you numbskull.

          • Murphmeister

            I love that expression ” gender re-assignment ‘ for two reasons. First gender is grammatical and sex is biological. But ” re-assignment ” is the real kicker. By using re-assignment, the distinct implication is that someone or thing did the original assignment. Who or what, prithee would that have been? God, God’s nature, the Democratic Party? Well, it’s not wise to mess with God or God’s nature although I have fun messing with the Dimcrats.

          • Rattlerjake

            Really? [That’s not quite accurate. The Pope (NOT speaking “ex cathedra,” but
            just FOR HIMSELF) “signaled support” for LEGAL (NOT church) recognition
            of “SAME-SEX CIVIL UNIONS” (NOT the same thing as “MARRIAGE.”] What do you think “civil union” is, MORON! And you seriously think that the pope’s “PERSONAL OPINION” isn’t going to influence the masses? Right!
            The “POPE” is NOT supposed to express “personal opinion”, especially when it is in opposition to GOD’s word!

            And by the way, you idiot, I didn’t say anything about “sex-change” either – I said “same-sex”. What you show is you don’t have the ability to understand/comprehend what is said/written!

        • Michael Dennewitz

          And the little halfbreed faggot was sent to bring it all about. He and soreass are messengers, straight from HELL! 😣☹😢😭

        • jaquez

          THEY ARE ALL MENTALLY ILL US HAS A HUGE M PROBLEM WITH MENTAL ILLNESS BUT NO ONE WANTS TO ADDRESS IT!

          • rocky63

            Not too long ago, when we were just starting to hear about the garbage of kids of any age being able to recognize that they were really of a different gender than the one they were born with. At that time, while there were still quite a few sensible, thinking people in the US we began to see messages from psychologists and others who deal with human brain activity, that believed that these kids wanting to change their gender were, in fact, afflicted with a mental illness. I think it hasn’t changed; only those with some mental deficiency are willing to say they are no longer of one gender and are willing to undergo even surgical procedures to change their bodies to match their warped minds.

          • LeaM

            It certainly seems to ME to be a mental illness, but then there WAS a time when homosexuality was regarded that way, too. I don’t really CARE what they do TO THEIR OWN BODIES as long as
            (1) I DON’T HAVE TO PAY FOR ANY OF IT, either thru government programs or private insurance, and
            (2) THEY DON’T INFLICT THE SAME DAMAGE ON CHILDREN (I’d like to say below 25, but the law makes ’em adults at 18, so I guess we’ll have to settle for that.)
            I’ll leave it to God (or the Devil) to decide what their ultimate punishment should be.

          • AmericanBelle

            In Destructive Trends in mental health, respected veterans of the mental health industry Rogers H.Wright and Nicholas A.Cummings sought to educate consumers, practitioners, and policy makers about a variety of recent issues and trends that have significantly changed the mental health fields in America. They got established and revered practitioners to write chapters which explore these important issues. The following regarding the removal of homosexuality from the DSM in 1973 was written as a matter of verifiable fact:

            “The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of the American Psychiatric Association yielded suddenly and completely to political pressure when in 1973 it removed homosexuality as a treatable aberrant condition. A political firestorm had been created by gay activists within psychiatry, with intense opposition to normalizing homosexuality coming from a few outspoken psychiatrists who were demonized and even threatened, rather than scientifically refuted. Psychiatry’s House of Delegates sidestepped the conflict by putting the matter to a vote of the membership, marking for the first time in the history of healthcare that a diagnosis or lack of diagnosis was decided by popular vote than by scientific evidence…”

          • AmericanBelle

            It has been noted in other writings that it was homosexual psychiatrists and/or supporters of homosexuality who LOCKED OUT all the others when they took the vote. I guess they learned this trick from politicians! The GOP was locked out of Obamacare negotiations; and Democrats were locked out (self-imposed) from tax reform.

          • LeaM

            Good point! I think you’re right, too, that the APA locked out of its “deliberations” about whether or not homosexuality was “normal” anyone who was known to hold a contrary view. Your comparison to the Obamacare and tax reform negotiations locking out those who didn’t toe the line of the party in control is a good one.
            The difference, though, is that Congress could change its collective mind (and indeed, already HAS on Obamacare) with relative ease; for the APA to revert to the position that homosexuality is “aberrant” would be MUCH more difficult. 🙁

          • disqus_7KiKMOOd1L

            I wonder how much transgenderism is brought on by young people who are outcasts among their peers, and claim to be transgender just for attention. Also, I believe that transgenders have a high incidence of depression and suicide. So I guess for those outcasts, that didn’t exactly work.

          • Rex Whitmer

            Likely the depression came from their own assessment. They want to be noticed for some psychological reason and this one works for them!

          • Rex Whitmer

            In my opinion rocky63 you’ve hit the nail on the head! These people need to be contained in some sort of holding until their mental illness is completely cured! It’s dangerous for them to be found among normal people whom accept who and what they are! It seems to be catching as well and we do not want that to happen! For our safety and theirs we must find asylums and hold them there until they are able to think properly.

          • Obie Miller

            rocky63, it appears that the inmates have taken over runn!ing the asylum in which we live

        • jaquez

          THEN WHY CAN’T WE JUST CALL THEM TURDS !

          • rocky63

            Sounds like a fairly good suggestion.

          • pappy450

            MENTALLY ILL. Time for a trip to the “rubber room” for a nice long rest.

          • Matlonc

            Hell Pappy- they can just enlist in the military and have everything paid for by the taxpayer !!!

          • pappy450

            I believe THAT is the “whole idea” behind this “push”. One freak got “theirs” paid for by you and I (and the rest of the Taxpayers). I would expect more “friendly fire” incidents . (that is IF they are ever “well” enough to be out in combat)

          • Matlonc

            I read it takes up to a year to recover from surgery NOT including the mental health side which never ends… pretty combat ineffective wouldn’t you say pappy?

          • Michael Dennewitz

            I served in Nam aboard an aircraft carrier. We hauled everything possible down there- brought body bags back. Over 59,000 boys sacrificed in the name of “population control,” and no one can convince me otherwise. Three days before we pulled out, hundreds of us stood on the flight deck and watched as they loaded “songbird mccain.” Vietnam was a set-up, a total waste of good lives and millions of dollars worth of ammo and equipment!! This earth will cease to exist should a “third world war”
            break out. I’m soooo glad my years on this planet are about used up.. GOD FORGIVE US AND HELP US!! 🤔🙁☹😢😭

          • pappy450

            All the more reasons to keep their mentally ill asses to hell OUT of our Military. These freaks are not what I would want watching my six for sure. President Trump AGAIN is correct.

          • Michael Dennewitz

            Send em all to Gitmo!😁😂

        • Mark

          I would simply shorten LGBTXXXYYYZZZ to H/T…(Homo/Tranny

          • rocky63

            Well, that would be shorter. But it seems that in recent times, the LGBT banner has had a lot of other letters added — though I admit that I don’t know what they all stand for. I only added the XYZ letters to remind us that it’s no longer just LGBT.

          • Ursus_Indomitus

            Don’t forget to add WTFBBQHUH? to the insanity.

          • Mark

            Yeah, according to TruNews.com there are several more letters added on to the original “LGBT”.
            The insanity keeps getting more insane

          • Tinman Jones

            What happened to the days when “rainbow” referred only to God’s promise after rain? Romans 12:12!

          • Matlonc

            I heard we (they) have now identified something like 62 genders !!!! Are you kidding me? There are two, always has been, always will be.

          • LeaM

            The LGBT acronym seems to have added a “Q,” which obviously stands for “queer,” but I have yet to figure out what is MEANT by “queer” in this horrible new vocabulary.

            In my day, a “queer” was an obviously gay man, but why would such individuals need their own designation? Aren’t they just “G” (gay)? Seems redundant.

            I’m not clear on initials for any other categories: the “T” presumably covers all sorts of transsexuals. Anyway, if any further adjustments are needed, I’d suggest an “I” for “INSANE” or maybe an “S” for “SCREWED-UP.”

          • Mark

            I’ve also heard that the “Q” stands for “questioning”. But as far as I’m concerned, there is only “homosexual” (LGB), and “transgender” (T). And there really isn’t any such real thing as transgender. You’re either Male or Female. I can’t deal with this anymore…I’m going to bed…

          • LeaM

            Well, that would make sense. And suggests there’s some HOPE for those people: they’re asking themselves QUESTIONS, meaning they’re NOT SURE of their “identities”. Better to be unsure (and thus open to LEARNING) than dead-set positive and dead WRONG.

          • Murphmeister

            QED

          • LeaM

            Well, since they keep adding new “genders” to the list of possibilities, they HAVE to keep adding initials to the list to identify all those new “genders.” Can’t leave out any form of weirdo, no matter HOW weird or how unique. There ARE only two genders, of course; the rest is all the result of mental illness. Even the Renaissance artists/sculptors who created images of “hermaphrodites” (for the ancient Greek god Hermes and goddess Aphrodite) KNEW what they were creating was ART, not REALITY. Maybe they were SMARTER than today’s “specialists.”

          • Topher Smith

            Wrong. Your level of education? Bona fides?

          • LeaM

            I think the whole thing nowadays is LBGTQ (for “queer”; back when I was young, “queer” was an offensive term for any variety of “gay”. Now it seems to have a distinct name, but I have NO IDEA how it differs from “Gay” for gay. But I think you have a point: maybe they’re trying to HIJACK THE WHOLE ALPHABET.

          • James Hopkins

            Back in the day gay meant happy, and anyone in that lifestyle cannot be happy. If they were there would not be a high suicide rate among them.

          • LeaM

            Not only did “gay” mean “happy” in the good old days, it was usually applied to LADIES, not gentlemen. A man might be happy, but calling him “gay” always sounded a little…odd. But maybe that was because the only gays who ever “came out” in those days were MEN.
            There was a 1930s musical comedy called “Gay Divorcee,” (music by Cole Porter; the movie starred Fred Astaire and Ginger Rogers) the heroine of which was simply a lady who was happy to have shed her unbearable husband. SHE was off to kick up her heels on a grand tour of European capitals. But “gay” had a very different meaning then from now. 🙁

          • Murphmeister

            Gay really meant light-hearted, happy-go-lucky ( a phrase we never use any more )

          • Murphmeister

            You can’t read Yeats great poem ” Lapis Lazuli ” without a willingness to utterly ignore our current use of the word gay.

          • Rex Whitmer

            You left off the “Q” for queer.

          • James Hopkins

            No call them what they are, queer!!!

        • Obie Miller

          What we see happening is this kind of situations, in my opinion, is due to the way we have raised our children and allowed them to be taught. The decline of moral and spiritual values of yesteryear are showing up, and yet many of us seem to be ignorant of the reason for it. GOD left us an instruction book called the bible, yet we still want to do it “our way” rather that HIS way. Well, I suppose we are just just destined to “reap what we have sewn”!

          • LeaM

            Sown. You SEW garments; you SOW seeds. “Sown” is the past tense for “SOW”.
            Otherwise, I agree completely. Of course not ALL parents have let their parenting duties slide that way: that’s why more and more families are making the financial sacrifice to put their kids in Christian charter or parochial schools, or homeschooling them.

            Worse, a frightening number of homes that self-identify as “Christian” don’t even HAVE a Bible. And don’t attend worship services of ANY kind. Sad!

          • jackieray

            and yet u new what was mint when you can’t refute the argument attack the spelling & grammer

          • NotJim

            “u new what was mint”

            So, was it “spearmeant” or “peppermeant” or maybe even “newmeant”?

            BTW, was she trying to “refute the argument”?

          • LeaM

            That’s “MEANT,” not “MINT.” And I “KNEW,” not “new”. I just hate dealing with ILLITERATES.
            BTW, since you are apparently TOTALLY unable to understand 6th grade English, I WAS AGREEING with Obie Miller’s post, just not with his spelling. (What I said was: “Otherwise, I AGREE COMPLETELY” — surely even you can understand that means i’M NOT TRYING TO REFUTE his/her arguments, but AGREE with them! Got it? “AGREE” means “TAKE THE SAME SIDE.”

        • Matlonc

          Go figure Rocky the more it is reported as if it was “normal” or mainstream, the more kids and people are “confused”. I blame the schools, media, and most importantly the parents for not doing their jobs.

          • LeaM

            ESPECIALLY the PARENTS. The words should’t even be MENTIONED in schools (at least not excepting “HEALTH” classes in high school), but if the PARENTS were PAYING ATTENTION to the NONSENSE their kids are having pushed into their SKULLS in EVERY CLASS, they’d pull the kids out an homeschool ’em or find a decent charter school. Or parochial, even if they’re NOT Catholics. ANYTHING but the HORRIBLE public schools that BRAINWISH kids to make them believe in everything from gender changeability to socialism.

          • Rex Whitmer

            Unfortunately, it’s sometimes the parents whom tell the kids that they’re different from what they are for their own selfish reasons. Sometimes back I recall a mother in New Jersey who had her son changed to a girl, because she wanted a daughter not a son!

          • LeaM

            Tragically, that situation is not all that unusual. Parents ARE choosing to assign their kid(s) to the gender opposite the one into which the kid was born: it”s’ one of the biggest sources of interest in “gender-reassignment” (THE biggest, by far, where KIDS under, say, 16 are involved).

            Nearly grown adolescents (I picked 16 as a dividing line, but it would really vary with the individual teenager) and adults come up with other reasons; in some cases to get attention, in others because they really believe they’ll be happier as members of the other gender. Sadly, such people are JUST PLAIN UNHAPPY (also known as DEPRESSED), and likely won’t be any happier as members of the opposite gender than they are in the one they were born into. What they need is psychological therapy to get at and hopefully cure the CAUSE of their DEPRESSION, not an alteration in their sex organs. 🙁

          • rocky63

            Matlonic, I can only agree with you. While there are a number of factors contributing to this ridiculous breakdown of sensible thinking, I am convinced that our schools (not ALL of them) have become a big part of the problem. They are now teaching that the “any gender for anyone who wants it” insanity is just normal. It’s not. And our future is in jeopardy for this and other reasons. Such as school teaching kids how to pray like a Muslim and to consider joining Islam.

          • Rex Whitmer

            This has it’s roots in the Obama regime. They more or less federalized the local schools and set out criteria for this sort of thing, like letting a boy use the girls restroom because he thinks he’s a girl! Those on the left need to re-evaluate themselves on this issue!

      • Steve Crawford

        Another white religious bigot who probably is a card carrying white nationalist. Where in you Bible does God see “mixing with Negros” is a sin? Was it a sin for your forefathers raping, murdered and enslave black Africans? Racist white male such as you will giver many foreign nations to reject the USA government policies, and only take the foreign aid. Many foreign non-whites have access to this blog and see the hatred messages that many white males write. Although I could never become a Muslim and worship a so called prophet, Muslims from all nations and all ethnicities worship together as one. It is my strong reason that people like you (if you attend at church) that I will not attend a predominate white members church. I do not want to think that the white person I would sitting next to me is a hatred and racist religious hypocrite. Satan attends your church also.

        • Rattlerjake

          Really? A bigot? Fine, I’m a bigot, if that means that I believe in the facts and not your leftist lies! I believe what GOD said, over what man claims!

          Before I address your questions, I will say that IF YOU READ WHAT I PROVIDED then you wouldn’t ask “STUPID” questions! What I provided gives all of the answers that I am going to now repeat, with scripture. Additionally, nowhere does any of this information contain racism or bigotry; what it provides is the explanation of the origin of whites vs blacks – FROM GOD’s description! I see no where that that shows hatred for either white or black, but what it does, that you satan worshipers hate, is proves that we are violating God’s laws, just as the new homosexual agenda is doing!

          1. [Where in you Bible does God see “mixing with Negros” is a sin? ]

          The 7th commandment is to not commit adultery; the 10th commandment is to not covet
          ones neighbors wife; the two would be the same commandment. Therefore, it is obvious that
          the 7th is entirely different than the 10th which is to covet another’s wife. Therefore, the following verses make much more sense when we realize that “Adultery” is the mixing of another race or people other than a brother or sister Israelite.

          Leviticus 18:23: “NEITHER SHALT THOU LIE WITH ANY BEAST TO DEFILE THYSELF THEREWITH:NEITHER SHALL ANY WOMAN STAND BEFORE A BEAST TO LIE DOWN THERETO: it is confusion.”

          Yahweh does not kill just to be killing; and to kill an animal because a woman had
          intercourse with it would be unfair, unjust and unreasonable because the beast would not
          know any better than to treat the woman as another animal. Yahweh simply would not do
          this.

          Leviticus 20:15-16: “And if a man lie with a beast, he shall surely be put to death: and ye shall slay the beast. And IF A WOMAN APPROACH UNTO ANY BEAST, and LIE DOWN THERETO,THOU SHALT KILL THE WOMAN, and THE BEAST: they shall surely be put to death; their blood shall be upon them.”

          Here again, this states that either the man or the woman that lies down with a beast would
          be put to death together. Again Yahweh would not kill an animal because it did not know
          better than to lie with the woman or man. Another thing, if anyone has ever seen an animal
          copulate with others they can quickly see that the animal would not lie down, as it does
          its copulating standing up. There are no animals that copulate in a prostrate position,
          lying down position.

          Therefore, common sense, which we realize that few Christians have when studying the
          scriptures, would tell one that to commit adultery is to mix with the other races which is
          an abomination to Yahweh, in itself. http://fathersmanifesto.net/wm/adultery.htm

          2. [Was it a sin for your forefathers raping, murdered and enslave black Africans?] Exactly WHAT is your proof that MY forefathers acted in such a manner? You know NOTHING of my ancestry! You are typical of the Godless who insist on always making accusations without facts; and God warned of making false witness! My question, which IS historical fact, WAS it a sin for YOUR forefathers to rape, murder, and enslave black Africans? We KNOW from history that it was YOUR OWN PEOPLES that attacked other tribes, murdering many, “kidnapping” the women, young men, and children to incorporate into their tribe or to sell into slavery. We also KNOW that there were BLACK slave owners in the US as early as the early 17th-century, the first was Anthony Johnson (b. c. 1600 – d. 1670) a black Angolan. We also KNOW AS FACT that muslimes have enslaved blacks for centuries and still do!

          Lets also look at what “blacks” have done and continue to do in South Africa. First the historical facts that we KNOW: 1) South Africa was settled by white Dutch explorers. 2) South Africa contained NO Africans. 3) Blacks were initially brought to South Africa as laborers for the mines and farms/ranches. Slavery ceased more than a hundred year ago and South Africa provided jobs for many black Africans, and the country was one of the most prosperous in the world. When “apartheid” was claimed and the country was turned over to the blacks, they immediately began to destroy EVERTHING. They murdered and are still murdering whites, have taken over the farms which now produce NOTHING, and South Africa has become a country equivalent to the likes of the city of Shitcago! Next we could look at what negros have done to Haiti!

          3. [Racist white male such as you will giver many foreign nations to reject the USA government policies, and only take the foreign aid.] This sentence doesn’t even make sense!

          4. Many foreign non-whites have access to this blog and see the hatred messages that many white males write.] SO! The internet is also FULL of foreign and domestic “black” sites that extrude black hatred of whites. Besides, it is your opinion that what is said is hate; your view of hate is because it says something negative about blacks or says something different than what YOUR ignorant view is! Your point is moot.

          5. [Although I could never become a Muslim and worship a so called prophet, Muslims from all nations and all ethnicities worship together as one. It is my strong reason that people like you (if you attend at church) that I will not attend a predominate white members church. I do not want to think that the white person I would sitting next to me is a hatred and racist religious hypocrite. Satan attends your church also.]
          What is also obvious is that you are not a Christian either. If you were then you would believe God’s word. Whether you like what he says or not makes NO DIFFERENCE! God created this world and everything in and on it, and it is NOT for us to question him. As the Bible says, “church” is the individual, not some building where a bunch of people gather to claim to believe. Satan does NOT attend my church, but it is obvious that you know him personally!

    • Krazeehors

      Yep. He probably does.

      I have news for the transgender activists.

      A person’s “sex” is NOT “assigned at birth!”

      It is assigned IN UTERO, IN THE WOMB, MONTHS BEFORE BIRTH!!

      Idiots.

      Hope you are doing well, Michael! Merry Christmas, my friend!!

      • Michael Dennewitz

        Thank you my friend, I agree wholeheartedly. And have a Merry CHRISTmas yourself. 😁🤗

      • Topher Smith

        Your bona fides? Are you male? Have you always been male?

        • Krazeehors

          Are you freaking KIDDING me???

          I am a woman, and yes, I have ALWAYS been a girl.

          • Topher Smith

            Have all males always been male? Your education?

          • Krazeehors

            Honors. Southern Illinois University at Carbondale. Food and Nutrition/Dietetics. And yes, I DID take Anatomy.

            Regarding your stupid question: I wouldn’t know.

          • Topher Smith

            How would you not know that? Why lie about your education? Your social media?

          • Krazeehors

            I do NOT use Social Media unless I HAVE to. It is a waste of time and stupid to boot. As a matter of fact, the ONLY site I peruse ON OCCASION would be my high school alumni association.

          • Krazeehors

            I have NEVER lied about my education. So, YOU have identified yourself as someone I want nothing to do with, or did you NOT read the last personal email I sent you?

          • Topher Smith

            Yes you did. What email, tard?

          • Topher Smith

            Ruth…we have been through this already, dropout. Did you forget?

          • Topher Smith

            No degrees huh Ruth?

          • Krazeehors

            Actually, YES, I DO have TWO degrees. BOTH of them were with high honors — Straight A’s for my Associate’s Degree; 3.53 GPA for my Bachelor’s of Science.

            I don’t know what business it is of yours, but if you are who I think you are, you are a member of my family. That is the ONLY way you would know my first name.

            AND, further, IF you are who I THINK you are, you were at my graduation.

            Leave me alone and stop harassing me. I don’t need any of your shit, now or ever.

          • Topher Smith

            Pics of those degrees?

      • LeaM

        Krazeehors — you’re right: gender assignment (or sex assignment) DOES happen in utero. Why else would today’s dunderheads be spending good money for genetic testing to find out if they’re having a boy or a girl — if the decision hadn’t yet been MADE?

        But the transgender activists don’t care; they’re not really interested in which gender (sex) the couple is going to produce. They only want to make sure everyone knows they can CHANGE their kid’s gender if they want to. (And under today’s laws the KID — who will have to LIVE WITH THAT GENDER ASSIGNMENT ALL HIS/HER LIFE — has nothing to SAY about it. Criminal!

        • Krazeehors

          Good God! That is unbelievable. How ANY doctor in their right mind would do that to a child — an innocent child — is beyond me.

          • LeaM

            Me, too. The parents who arrange for a “doctor” to MUTILATE their child that way should go STRAIGHT to prison for the rest of their lives. Hopefully BEFORE the surgery can be performed (it takes awhile: “transgenders” need to have an extensive course of hormone “therapy” before even the SLEAZIEST “doctor” will do the surgery. And of course NO doctor will operate on a child unless the
            PARENT(S) have asked for the surgery.
            But ALL sex-adjustment treatments, whether hormone shots or surgery, should be forbidden before a person is an ADULT — not just 18, but maybe 30, old enough to prove he/she IS grown up. And both parents and doctor who order any such procedures up before then should spend the REST OF THEIR LIVES in prison.

          • LeaM

            I agree completely. I would make it a CRIME punishable by LIFE IN PRISON (NO parole) for anyone (doctor, parent, “transgender activist”) who inflicted such damage on a child under 18. If we’re calling 18-year-olds “adults” (which seems ludicrous to me, but never mind…), I suppose we have to let them make such decisions for themselves, but I’d set a much higher minimum age for the surgery if it could be done constitutionally. i’d also REQUIRE anyone considering it to read a TON of literature about the horrible examples that have happened with people who tried it already….

    • Topher Smith

      Jesus created nothing. He is a myth.

      • Gregory Brewster

        To say Jesus is a myth is just historically incorrect. If you don’t want to believe he is Divine as I do that is certainly your right. The man Jesus of Nazareth did live, even agnostic and atheist historian’s have written on this. Perhaps you are as some and say the Holocost is a myth also ? Creating one’s own reality is big today.

        • Topher Smith

          Drivel. There is ZERO evidence he existed and the Romans kept meticulous records. Holocost? Too funny, dropout.

          • Lee Martinsen

            There is a lot more proof of Jesus’s existence, than proof he didn’t exist, since the ONLY proof Jesus didn’t exist, is in the minds of delusional dingbats.

          • Topher Smith

            Proof he didnt exist. You’re a brainiac huh? Share the evidence of his existence…

          • LeaM

            A child named Joshua (the Hebrew name) or Jesus (the Greek version) WAS born to a couple named Joseph and Mary in Bethlehem at the right time to have been Christ. Since Joseph was “of the house and lineage of David” (meaning he could trace his ancestry back to King David, c. 3200 B.C.), he, his wife, and their newborn Son were there, in BETHLEHEM, at the right time to PAY THEIR TAXES TO ROME. There is no record of Joseph and Mary (by name) PAYING their taxes, because the Romans considered the Judeans (and other Hebrew tribes) to be a lower form of life, and didn’t keep track of them BY NAME. (Sigh! If only they’d had computers — even circa-1982 PCs! But they didn’t.)
            Considering the frequency with which that part of the world has been conquered and re-conquered by people determined TO ERASE all traces of the Biblical-era tribes (like, but not limited to, the Judeans) it’s amazing there’s ANYTHING left. But there IS, and archaeologists FIND MORE EVERY YEAR. Non-believers find they have less and less on which to base their own disbelief, while Christians and Jews find more and more and more…

          • Topher Smith

            That isn’t proof. Are you brain dead?

          • LeaM

            It’s been accepted as FACT by millions of people, Christians, Jews, and even MUSLIMS, FOR ALMOST 2000 YEARS. There ARE no authorities who DENY the essential facts of the story of Jesus and his family: they may dispute His divinity, but NOT His existence.
            I WILL NOT RESPOND TO ANY FURTHER POSTS FROM YOU UNTIL YOU STATE YOUR ACADEMIC CREDENTIALS — which you have NOT done, and as far as I can tell DO NOT POSSESS. Unless you can prove to me that you have expertise
            IN THIS FIELD, you can take your anti-Christian MYTHOLOGY and GO STRAIGHT TO HELL. You’ll be there soon enough, anyway.

          • Topher Smith

            Yes there are. I already shared my school. Twice, retard. Share your evidence. Hell is a myth for the feeble minded. I study mythology daily. It began when I was ten and discovered Joseph Campbell and read a book titles “How the Irish Saved Civilization” by Thomas Cahill.

          • LeaM

            Oh, wow — someone (an ADULT, at that!) who takes Joseph Campbell SERIOUSLY. I thought HIS serious fans wee all 12 or under. And while Thomas Cahill’s book was amusing, I wouldn’t quote it as objective evidence of ANYTHING except the author’s sense of humor.
            You shared your school, but not, I think, your degree(s) or even field of study. For all I know, you got a degree in gender studies or some other non-subject.
            Go right on thinking that Hell is a myth, buster. You might have a rude awakening one day, but that’s YOUR lookout.

          • LeaM

            Amen!

          • Topher Smith

            Odd. Proof he didnt exist? Okay. Anyway…share your proof of his existence.

          • LeaM

            Isn’t it amazing how “Topher Smith” makes ALL his (her?) points by calling other people “dropouts.” Wonder if Topher finished high school — based on his/her discussion, I’d guess NOT. Also, it’s usually the high school dropout who is the most accusatory about other’s people educational achievements.

          • LeaM

            There is PLENTY of evidence of the existence of the man named “Joshua” or “Jesus” (the latter is the Greek form of his Hebrew name) of Nazareth. You can believe in His divinity or not, as you choose — it’s only in MUSLIM countries that they KILL PEOPLE for saying they don’t believe in Allah; not believing in the Christian God is legally if not ethically permissible.
            BTW, the Romans DID NOT keep good records of the names & other information on the Judeans and other conquered people — just on THEIR OWN people. Please note that the parents of the about-to-be-born infant Jesus were traveling to Bethlehem to PAY THE TAX RECENTLY IMPOSED BY THEIR ROMAN MASTERS: “And it came to pass in those days that there went out a decree from Caesar Augustus that ALL THE WORLD should be taxed. And ALL WENT TO BE TAXED, everyone to his own city. And Joseph (Jesus’s father) also went out from Galilee, out of the city of Nazareth, and into Judea, unto the City of David, which is called BETHLEHEM (because he was of the house and lineage of David), to be taxed with Mary, his espoused wife, being great with child” (aka: pregnant). “And so it was that while they were there, she brought forth their first-born son…” (named Joshua (Hebrew) or Jesus (Greek).)
            The JUDEANS — the people of the lineage of KING DAVID — were also good record-keepers. Unfortunately, when the Arab tribes attacked and laid waste the Holy Land in later centuries, most of the Judean records were destroyed (with them proof positive of Jesus’s existence). Having been conquered first by Mohammed and forced by him to worship Allah (a “god” who didn’t even APPEAR in ANYONE’S pantheon until the 7th century A.D.) you can, if you like, BLAME THE MUSLIMS for destroying the records proving the existence of Jesus Christ. But I really don’t care if you do or not. There’s PLENTY of other evidence, covering ground from Judea to Rome. ONLY THE BLIND CAN’T (or don’t WANT to) see it.

          • Topher Smith

            Okay. Share the evidence.

          • LeaM

            You didn’t share YOUR qualifications — just claimed to have had a “full ride” (what, a football scholarship?) at Vanderbilt, which I would consider an adequate but not outstanding university anyway. And you didn’t answer the important question: WHAT DID YOU STUDY? Did it have ANY relevance to the subject under discussion? These days it’s possible to get a 4-year degree without EVER taking a SERIOUS course at all.

          • Topher Smith

            Adequate? Too funny, trash. Your school?

          • Topher Smith

            Share your sources and education. That drivel was hilarious.

          • LeaM

            I just posted to YOU to SHARE YOUR QUALIFICATIONS (education & anything else). You keep demanding those of OTHER people, but I DON’T SEE YOURS ANYWHERE. They’d better be SUPER-IMPRESSIVE, the way you keep dissing OTHER people.
            Most of what I posted comes (directly) from the King James Version of the Bible, the Gospel According to Luke (mainly chapter 2). I consider that authoritative, but I know YOU won’t (even though it has been generally regarded as THE WORD OF GOD for nearly 2,000 years). So I WANT TO KNOW WHAT BRILLIANT QUALIFICATIONS YOU BRING TO THE DEBATE.
            Then MAYBE I’ll share MY academic qualifications with YOU. Or maybe NOT.

          • Topher Smith

            I did. Vanderbilt. Full ride. You? So, you are attempting to use The Bible to prove things in The Bible right? Seriously?

          • LeaM

            What was your field of study? Underwater basket-weaving? Gender studies? Diversity studies? Even semi-good schools like Vanderbilt have whole divisions full of non-academic majors for modern idiots who really don’t belong in a decent university anyway.

      • Ursus_Indomitus

        Prove it.

        • Topher Smith

          Prove what?

      • Lee Martinsen

        YOU are a myth, and a disgusting, whatever you are. I will pray for you, that you find God before you meet him.

        • Topher Smith

          Gibberish. No wonder you belueve in a sky fairy.

        • LeaM

          That’s a nice prayer — that the unbeliever will “find God before they meet Him.” I get the feeling they’re not WORTH the generous sentiment, but maybe….

          • Topher Smith

            Really? Not worth it? Care to elaborate?

          • LeaM

            Don’t interrupt my exchanges with other people. It’s RUDE. I will not respond FURTHER to YOUR drivel until you prove to me that you have SOME academic or professional credentials worthy of notice. Bet you don’t/can’t.

        • Topher Smith

          Too funny. I am a myth? How so? How am I disgusting?

      • roelaren

        Keep telling yourself that. One of these days you will find out. Good Luck!

        • Topher Smith

          I know now, little brain.

    • Lee Martinsen

      AMEN Brother.

    • Matlonc

      Its called child abuse Michael. These innocent children would only know that if you have a penis you are a boy and if you have a vagina you are a girl. The rest of it is a mental illness and now they are making it easier for predators to prey on children with their assistance. Sexual education is ONLY for boys and girls and should teach abstinence or at the very least least birth control of which most of it is free anyway.

    • John Redman

      While I (and Dr. Mercola) blame the neurotoxins present in the “vaccines” freely injected into newborns across the globe. Oh, Big Pharma shall remain nameless in the quest for things to blame. Not by me, certainly, not by me.

      • LeaM

        That’s NOT “Big Pharma” ordering up those “vaccines.” It’s BIG GOVERNMENT. “Big Pharma” is just providing what the GOVERNMENT has ORDERED.

        • John Redman

          Big Pharma formulates them or did I miss something?

          • LeaM

            Of course “Big Pharma” formulates the Rx drugs available whether thru insurance or on the consumer market. That’s what pharmaceutical companies DO — and when we want to grump about high Rx drug prices, we should THINK about the FACT that, if some pharmaceutical company HADN’T spent MILLIONS formulating and testing those drugs, they wouldn’t be AVAILABLE to SAVE LIVES.
            What I was talking about was specifically the issue of whether the vaccines children have to get before they either leave the hospital or start school ARE DEMANDED BY THE GOVERNMENT, not by the drug companies. And it IS the govt. that says kids MUST get those vaccinations — its NOT the pharmaceutical companies seeing a market and swooping in on it. Maybe I didn’t express the thought clearly. We can THANK the Rx drug companies for developing/testing the drugs so that kids CAN be protected against…whatever; but the Rx drug companies don’t REQUIRE anyone to take their drugs: only the GOVERNMENT can do THAT.

    • LeaM

      You’ve got THAT 100% right! Any parent who persuades (or demands) a child to adopt another gender than the one he/she was born with is committing the WORST kind of child abuse and should be tried and sent to prison. For a long time, if it were up to ME.

      “Little kids” (under what, 18?) simply DO NOT have enough understanding either of what “gender” means OR the PERMANENCE of a decision to change it. What happens if the kid born male takes hormones because Mom and Dad wanted a daughter, and then finds himself as a young adult wanting to restore Nature’s work? What happens ESPECIALLY if that kid-born-male is persuaded to go all the way and…er, loses his male genitals and THEN realizes the switch was a mistake? Or what happens if the kid-born-FEmale has been stuffed so full of MALE hormones that SHE can’t transition all the way back? If they’re ADULTS BEFORE they start messing around with their own bodies, I guess that’s their business (AS LONG AS I AND OTHER NO RMAL MEN AND WOMEN DON’T HAVE TO PAY FOR THEIR “TREATMENT”!) I sure don’t want them ANYWHERE near ME or MY KIDS, but if they want to live LIKE FREAKS, and IF it’s not covered by ANY kind of insurance, public or private, to which I have to contribute, fine, let ’em play with themselves.

    • drantigmo

      Wait…. the “perfection” was destroyed the minute businesses thought they had a RIGHT to dump toxic, homo-making chemicals on us all….

  • The duck

    Now I, being confused, want to know how anyone is going to determine the reason a student will want to be identified as the opposite gender they were born as?

    The reason a boy might want to be identified as a girl seems obvious do to a boys interest in the physical anatomy of the female. Oh I am sure girls are just as interested in the male anatomy also. That of course would a be a devious reason to want to be identified as the opposite gender, and easy to lie about that being the reason. So how does one decide if the student is being deviously dishonest?

    Adults are showing their devious dishonesty by even courting such behavior. It is the adults who capitulate with the dishonesty of the LGBT agenda. Of course the LGBT social groups if composed of adults only wish to live their lives in same sex arrangements as consenting adults, fine but leave that life style at home. It does not belong in our school system.

  • Jim Coles

    This whole ‘gender confusion’ nonsense is insane — promoted by social disruptors … leave the kids alone: it’s tough enough learning who one is and growing up without a bunch of crazy Leftist jerk-offs making it harder for kids to grow up.

  • Gammi2Anna

    The clause regarding the assumption that a student would select an alternate gender identity for some improper basis proves beyond a doubt that the school officials already know that there has been and will continue to be instances where this is the case. It is nothing more than a way to protect their butt in the instance that a male student or other personnel at the school slips into the girls locker room to peep or sexually assault a female child. It could even happen vise versa. All I know is that this is the continuation of the LGBT to control and assert or inability to accept their gender confusion by making everyone else feel or live by their standards. Why have we allowed our education system to become obsessively involvement with such mundane issues which should be left to the parents. America is on a slippery slope of total destruction of our own future by allowing millions of unborn babies to be slaughtered and cutting up of the body parts for commercialized sales. Now we are denying a parent the right to even call their newly born child either a boy or a girl. This is insanity leading to the bottom of Hell, with no good solution in sight. What will be the affect on a child that is called neither a son or daughter during the first 13 years of their life? How should they dress? What happens when the non-identified gender child begins the development of traits that represent either womanhood or manhood? Children Learn what they Live and Live what they Learn. How can they grow up to be an adult with any sense of who they are or why they exist if we begin their lives with this totally despicable regime of one particular group of people.

  • George E. LeFebvre

    If you were born a Boy then be a boy, if a girl, be a girl. In my opinion you can claim yourself transgender when you actually have your plumbing changed. Before you do that Ladies use ladies rooms and boys use men’s rooms. case closed.

    • Rattlerjake

      Just because you take the nameplate off of a chevy and put it on a ford, doesn’t make that vehicle a chevy.

      • Thomas R Zuliani Sr

        Well said. If a male penis is eliminated by surgery, & a vagina constructed,
        I don’t think there would any sexual feeling. How do U construct a clitoris
        so that it emulates a natural one? I think not.

        • Lee Martinsen

          The change will never be completed, You cannot make a man into a woman. If it could be done, men could have babies, and women could get men pregnant.

        • Rattlerjake

          It doesn’t have anything to do with replacement parts, because it is your chromosomes that dictate your gender – you can’t change your chromosomes from what you were born with!

      • Lee Martinsen

        Good analogy.

    • DrBarbara

      Doesn’t matter if the “plumbing” is changed, there’s always that pesky Y chromosome to deal with~~can’t change that or do away with it……..

    • pappy450

      Trouble is, the “plumbing ” can be changed, but DNA and chromosomes are FOREVER. You are not fooling anyone but yourself.

    • Lee Martinsen

      Having a sex change change operation will NOT make a woman into a man, or a man into a woman.

  • fidel

    Cannot be a woman with a penis, Bruce Jenner. Talk about mental illness, the left is lost.

  • Frank W Brown

    Ther are TWO, count em, TWO genders, EVERYTHING else is MENTAL ILLNESS that needs TREATMENT! It is PATENTLY child abuse to convince a child that her/his sex was wrong, God doesn’t make mistakes!

  • Jeff

    The Lord would take one look at our society and be like, “damn the devil won while I was sleeping” …..wtf

    • Frank W Brown

      True That!

  • William McNamara

    I guess if a kid came in to school and claimed to be a dolphin, he/she/it would, from then on, be known as “the dolphin”? Where is this going to stop? Any boy who thinks he’s a girl and any girl who thinks she’s a boy are mentally ill and need psychiatric help, not special treatment to encourage the mental illness. These poor, misguided kids almost always wind up taking their own lives after years of mental torment. Please, help these kids. Their lives are worth saving.

    • JCluvsTrump

      This identification problem can be cured with a shot.

      • Nick

        I am sure you mean a shot from a certified well made military grade weapon, not a syringe!!! If that is the case, I think you are right!

        • JCluvsTrump

          You are correct sir!

          • Nick

            Thank you for confirmation. I thought you meant that. Asked just to make sure. I am not blood hungry, but these people are not really Homo Sapiens. They are not animals either! They are gravely and incurably sick. To end their suffering is MERCY!

          • JCluvsTrump

            Ditto. If you don’t even have a clue what or who you are, how can you possibly expect to function through life!? You could end up in some sort of zombie state of mind forgetting to eat or breath.

        • Flotmorton P. Gildersleeve

          One shot from you to a child whose identity has been compromised would get a Marine K-Bar accross
          your throat, idiot.

    • LeaM

      Very good question! But it’s usually NOT the “BOYS” or “GIRLS” who decide they want to switch genders — it’s their INSANE PARENTS (who decide it’d have been nicer if they’d had a boy, or if they’d had a girl…) The kids usually can’t decide for themselves — even the doctors who DO this kind of treatment or surgery don’t do it to KIDS unless a parent signs the papers (and pays the bills). IMHO the PARENTS should GO PRISON for the rest of their lives: talk about “child abuse”!

  • JCluvsTrump

    Democrats will do any thing and every thing to detract the publics attention from their failures as a governing body. Disgusting what they will sacrifice to save face. They have kept the black race down for generations just to have some one to talk to.

  • Murphmeister

    I love that, gender assigned at birth. First, gender is grammatical, he or she, him or her. Sex is biological, male or female. Anything other than a male or female is asexual. Assigned. Usually means to designate. I have never seen the word used except with the implication that there is a consciousness behind the assignment, i.e., that an intelligent or sentient being was behind it. So, who are they saying assigned the gender ( sex )? Well, the only two possible answers are either God or God’s Nature. But, if we approach it from a non-theological and purely scientific angle, a person’s sex is assigned by Nature or more specifically genetics ( which some would say is simply God’s code for all living things ).

    Thus, if a person is born to one of the two sexes which entails all the visible sexual apparatus, we know from biology ( genetics ) that person is encoded with all the genes and chromosomes that comport with the physical appearance and that these genes and chromosomes are in every cell of the body. No amount of so-called education can game that system. But, in respect to ” changing genders “, we know that is an unnatural perturbation of the natural order. We also know that a person of one sex who claims to be of the other sex suffers from a mental disorder. Hence, government and especially educators promote that disorder and worse, they allow the mentally disordered to dictate policy. That is government and society gone insane.

    • Nick

      Brilliant! SIMPLY BRILLIANT!

      • Topher Smith

        No, it was drivel.

    • Topher Smith

      Who is we? Your sources? Links? Education?

      • Murphmeister

        In psychology and psychiatry there is a specific name for this mental disorder.

        • Topher Smith

          Drivel. Answer the questions or shut up.

        • Krazeehors

          You will never convince her. Ever. She sent ME a reference to a Science journal article entitled “We are all Female,” or words to that effect.

          • Murphmeister

            Well, anthropologically speaking, I do believe we are all out of Africa. But, we came out in two different sexes and went four different ways.

          • Krazeehors

            I know “Topher Smith” personally. She will NEVER be convinced of ANYTHING by ANYBODY involving the existence of GOD or JESUS CHRIST. I agree with you, so don’t waste your energy typing a response.

      • BornAMileHigh✓ᵀᴿᵁᴹᴾ

        Why do you need “sources, links, education?” Do you not have ANY DISCERNMENT???? Re-read it, it’s all well-written, explained, and logical. That is unless you have dysphoria, and therefore and freaking out that there’s not an explanation for it…

        • Topher Smith

          So, nothing huh? Too funny…

          • BornAMileHigh✓ᵀᴿᵁᴹᴾ

            I’ve dealt with “little squirts” like you before . You carry on about “needing sources,” yet won’t go seek the information out for yourselves. It’s like you want us to spoon feed you like your mommy still does. I say get off your lazy *ss and go seek for yourself. Stop being so helpless, it’s annoying to the rest of the grown-ups.

          • Topher Smith

            It is not my job to do so. It is up to the person making claims to share facts that support them.

          • BornAMileHigh✓ᵀᴿᵁᴹᴾ

            perhaps if you had more in your head then people owe you a living, or anything for that matter, you will seek it out.

          • Topher Smith

            Lemar..your grammar is atrocious. I cannot seek out the evidence for the claims of others until they provide the evidence, dropout.

          • BornAMileHigh✓ᵀᴿᵁᴹᴾ

            blah blah blah. I’m guessing you must owe thousands in student loans since you keep dropping “hints” of education level. Each time I graduated with a different degree, I didn’t owe a nickel. Sap! No doubt it will prevent you from EVER leaving your parents’ house.

          • Topher Smith

            Vanderbilt. Full ride. You never graduated. Why lie? You are projecting, dropout.

          • BornAMileHigh✓ᵀᴿᵁᴹᴾ

            hahahahahaha Good for you.

          • Topher Smith

            Have you Lemar?

        • Topher Smith

          Then explain it, dropout..

          • BornAMileHigh✓ᵀᴿᵁᴹᴾ

            Why should I have to? I’m not your parent. Go find your daddy, perhaps he’ll stop screwing his ho’s long enough to sit ya down.

          • Topher Smith

            I knew you couldn’t Lemar. Why reply at all?

          • BornAMileHigh✓ᵀᴿᵁᴹᴾ

            yawn

      • LeaM

        You’ve spent a LOT of time asking other people to state THEIR educational qualifications (as if one had to be a Ph.D. in, oh, maybe physiology to HAVE any right to air an opinion). SO…what are YOUR (sterling — they’d BETTER be!) qualifications to opine? Or you just a dumb-ass with a lot of opinions who thinks everything he reads on the Internet is TRUE. Now THAT would be IDIOCY.

        So STATE YOUR QUALIFICATIONS before you demand anybody else’s!

        • Topher Smith

          What? That was gibberish. Vanderbilt. Full ride. You? Why not provide sources? Do you know what that means?

          • LeaM

            Gibberish? I merely asked you to state YOUR qualifications before demanding anyone else’s. Vanderbilt? OK — good, not great. Full ride? THAT could mean a FOOTBALL scholarship, or maybe you’re a member of a minority: I’m NOT impressed.

            I DO know what “provide sources” means, but again, WHY THE HELL SHOULD I PROVIDE ANYTHING WHEN ALL YOU HAVE SAID WAS YOU GOT A “FULL RIDE” AT VANDERBILT? Studying WHAT? Gender studies? Underwater basket-weaving? WHAT? If you can’t tell me THAT, why in hell should I believe you even WENT to Vanderbilt? All I have to “prove” it is your DUBIOUS claim.

          • Topher Smith

            Seriously? Vandy is a great school. Can you read, tard. I aked after I was questioned. You dont know what sources are? Too funny, dropout. Studying law, cretin. How is it dubious? You know these things can be verified right, little brain?

    • LeaM

      You’re right: “gender” should be used to define PRONOUNS, while genetic arrangements should be called “SEX.” People started using “gender” to define
      PEOPLE when some folks got nervous about that awful word, “sex.”
      But the definitions of words DO change as usage changes (just check an old English dictionary — you’ll be astonished at the number of words that have changed meaning!), and sadly, I think we’ve reached the point of no return on that one. “Gender” is now a synonym for “sex” as well. Lots of words have multiple meanings, though, so it’s not the end of the world.
      You’re absolutely right that “changing genders” is an “unnatural perturbation of the natural order.” (Well said!) But I’m not sure it’s entirely fair to attribute the insanity to KIDS who are FORCED through the treatment (and surgery, God help us!) BY THEIR PARENTS, for whatever STUPID reason Mom and Dad have decided that little Johnny should have been little Joanie, or maybe the other way around. The KID doesn’t have much say in the matter, especially if he/she is s pre-teen or younger. Frankly, I’d LOCK THE PARENTS UP and THROW THE KEY INTO THE DEEPEST PART OF THE PACIFIC OCEAN. Then I’d give the damaged child the best available treatment to RENORMALIZE his or her gender (or sex) identity.

      • Murphmeister

        Ah, the etymology and evolution of language. History demonstrates it changes but English, being an international language, must adhere to standards in order for it to remain internationally functional. I love to preface this and any other issue involving science with admonitions regarding standards. If people are willing to play fast and loose with language, they’ll do the same with science. This is true whether it is biology or climatology. Never allow a person in an argument to dictate the language such as illegal alien versus undocumented immigrant. Once they do, they win the argument even if the substance of the argument in on your side. Be Churchillian in this regard: never give up, never surrender.

        • LeaM

          Good point — surrendering on the linguistic front can indeed lead to surrender, or at least defeat, in terms of meaning.
          I generally use “illegal immigrant,” just because “alien” has (to some people, anyway) another meaning and I really don’t want to get bogged down in a discussion of UFOs or the possible existence of extraterrestrial critters SOMEWHERE out there (a question I prefer not to debate).
          I generally do take a Churchillian position (on almost anything), but I have to temper that by recalling that if Churchill had remained Churchillian at Yalta, the division of Europe for 45 years might have been avoided. Even Churchill wasn’t ALWAYS Churchillian.

  • Dan

    Transgender : definition_________ A mental illness that manifest itself in someone who doesn’t believe the plumbing they are born with. Treatment_______ Join the democratic party and whenever possible show your mental illness by visiting the rest room opposite of your plumbing and play like you are persecuted.

    • DrBarbara

      Great definition!

  • Chuck

    “We” are not “unmoored”. It is the political establishment and the “mainstream” media who have promoted this blather for decades and have now really sunk their hooks into a vulnerable electorate. Remember Josef Goebbels, Hitler’s Minister of Propaganda? Here is the most important thing this guy ever said: “If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will
    eventually come to believe it. The lie can
    be maintained only for such time
    as the State can shield the people from the political, economic
    and/or military consequences of the lie. It
    thus becomes vitally important for
    the State to use all of its powers to repress dissent, for the truth
    is the mortal enemy of the lie, and
    thus by extension, the truth is the
    greatest enemy of the State.” Remember this when the lie perpetuates and becomes the “truth”.

    • Topher Smith

      Ironic much? Fake quote. Goebels never said it. http://www.bytwerk.com/gpa/falsenaziquotations.htm

      • Chuck

        Okay, possibly he didn’t say it. I have NOT spent hours of research trying to find out, but I will give you an excerpt from that alleged quote. Whether or not Goebbels said it is immaterial. The problem is, the quote is a true datum (unfortunately):

        “If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will eventually come to believe it.” —

        Do you doubt that? The media and the government have been spewing this insane garbage about transgenderism and other unnatural sexual phenomena for decades, until a substantial portion of the population has come to believe it.

        • Topher Smith

          It is not immaterial..and it is quite ironic. Do you understand the irony? It would only take a minute to find out the quote is fake.

  • Nana Monster

    And they wonder WHY Calipornia is on fire????

    • Charlie ********

      Curious what this story has to do with California?

    • Topher Smith

      I’ll bite. Why is it on fire?

      • Ursus_Indomitus

        Ask Jim Morrison.

  • Len

    We have become Sodom and Gomorrah and waiting for how that turned out.

  • Charlie ********

    Sadly, public schools are failing but that is not their fault. The problem is out tax money is going to for-profit charter schools. Every dollar going into the pocket of charter schools’ investors is one less dollar invested in public education. If we would stop making charter schools rich and invest in public schools by paying decent salaries we could attract and retain the teachers necessary to educate our kids.

  • John Williams

    We are fast approaching the point in time when the heads of these idiots are going to start exploding, their little pea sized brains (I am being generous here) are having to bend around all the BS that they promote, it will happen. Of course they may be holding out just in case one of the kids decides he is a German Shepard or a goat.

  • joe

    Chicago, Chicago what a F**ked Up town!

    • Ursus_Indomitus

      Chicago is an old indian word for CORRUPTION.

  • Sam

    Why not have these perverts just hang a sign around their neck as which gender they think they are, so that one is not fooled by their appearance?? We certainly do not want to offend anyone!

    • mica

      Good idea, Sam. If we refer to someone that is identifying as a gender that different from their birth gender, that can be taken as “hate speech”. That would eliminate that misunderstanding.

  • Gregory Brewster

    When I was real young I remember asking my Mother if I was a boy or a girl ? She said you are a boy, end of story. I knew I always liked what was the opposite of me. Now days with some of the convoluted parents running around, maybe they would have had me on the way to seek Mental Health counsel and a Surgeon ?

  • Ursus_Indomitus

    To Transies and their supporters: Be what you want, just don’t expect normal people to pay for you or for us to kiss your asses.
    Keep it out of our face.

  • a fool

    There are only Two genders in nature, from plants to humans, they are the Male Gender and the Female Gender! Anything is neither a male nor a female, is an IT~ the NON GENDER! Be honest! This world is confused enough, no more moronism! Transgender = transhuman. That is From one kind of human as a male or as a human female to an non HUMAN male nor female, thus this transgendered Being becomes an IT!

  • Terrance Coulombe

    It’s a good effort.

  • Krazeehors

    @Topher Smith:

    I know who you are, Misty. I can see that you are as hateful as you have always been, and JUST as big of a liar. Amazing that you would post a picture of one of your SONS as your Avatar.

    Like I said, LEAVE ME ALONE AND STOP HARASSING ME. I don’t need OR want you in my life and YOU made the decision to pull away from my family. As far as I am concerned, YOU are a waste of human flesh, male OR female.

    And, YES, there IS a GOD.

    YOU ARE BLOCKED.

    • Michael Dennewitz

      Gads! Sounds like my family. We aren’t sharing relatives, are we?? ROFLMAO

      • Krazeehors

        Just this one person, I think. Believe me, I understand. ROFLMAO, too.

  • RG ODOM

    IT’S EVIDENT THAT SOME OF THE LGBTQAH ARE GOING TO GET HURT BEFORE THIS CRAP STOPS… … THEY NEED TO GET BACK IN THE BASEMENT WHERE THEY BELONG WITH THE SEWER RATS

  • tes d’aless

    never had to deal with this crap in the 60’s etc. that’s why I wish Trump would make America like it use to be without all this nonsense.

  • Estell Newton

    Another Sodom and Gomorrah. That’s what the liberals are turning our country into. Why can’t they realize how much harm they are doing to our kids?

    • tes d’aless

      you need a brain to realize anything and the liberals are brainless, spineless, clueless and stupid

  • Charlie

    Going to K.I.S.S . ( keep it simple stupid ) there are two sexes . There is also a group promoting mental illness as if though their illness in a normality it is not . No matter what some warped greedy medical doctors can do to the human body’s outward appearance the genetics of said body remain the same . Therefore the so called sex change is like putting a dress on a pig it’s still a pig . Two sexes male and female simple straight forth and very factual . There is not a third sex . Any of our public servants that promote mental illness such as this should be removed from public servitude .

  • Jmanjo

    This is what happens when you let deviates have the run of the land!

  • CUZIN ERN

    That is called: a yes and a no, just take your pick!

  • Debra Shawver

    Read the 45 Communist Goals to takeover America…this is goal # 24 I think

  • David Mangum

    Why not close the Locker Rooms, then you got room for bathrooms for Girls, Boys, and Whatever.

    • Krazeehors

      ROFLMAO!! Thank you for giving me my “Chuckle for the Day!!”

  • drantigmo

    Well, the LGBGT agenda is about the sickest set of bs I’ve witnessed in my 65 years but what do you do with them? I mean there is no God coming to do a Sodom & Gomorrah on them…. ain’t no fixing them… and there are tens if not hundred million of them thanks to the litany of gender-bending chemicals the ag, plastic & petroleum industries demand to be “free” to dump on us….counting your kids too. So just what do all you in-bred, sister fukcing, hillbillies think we should do with your kids, their kids and the moes your Fuhrer demands be made?

    • Topher Smith

      The myth of Sodom and Gomorrah had nothing to do with homosexuality, brainiac.

      • Herb Branch

        Actually, after the British gained control of the Province of Palestine from the Ottoman Turks 100 years ago this month (during WWI) the way became open for western archeologists to explore those areas and determine whether or not any evidence of past civilizations – in the Biblical record or not.

        In 1924, two famous British archeologists (W.F. Albright and M.G. Kyle) extensively explored the region of the Dead Sea and were able to determine that about 2000 BC the region has undergone a great cataclism. That cataclism left evidence of a massive explosion of some sort which had scattered throughout the whole regionmany millioms of little balls (sizes ranged from like a pea up to about hen’s eggs size) of silicates of sulfur and mixed with traces of other local mineral. They were like volcanic geods formed by intense heat and then chilled in the upper atmosphere where the explosion had blasted them.

        What makes the find of large numbers of those sulferous geod-like stones is their similarity to the ones found around the areas of Nagasaki and Hiroshima Japan in September 1945 — which were formed from the atomic bombs that were exploded in those locations. “Sodom and Gomorah and the cities of the Plain” (five cities in all) had experienced an explosion that left behind the same sort of residule evidence as the 2 atomic bomb explosions in Japan in 1945.

  • IMSweetOlBob

    “Transgender”, BULLSLIP ! Next, there will be “Trans-specie” ! I just can’t wait for he declaration of “I’m just soooo proud of my son, the Collie !”
    FACE IT, YOU JERKS ! there are only two categories. Straight and Queer !

  • Larry Brule

    a false narrative! tranny’s are sick people, they don’t exist.

  • Timothy Toroian

    Michael may speak the truth, but clever is that school district for that wording. I wonder how much they’ll piss and moan if conservatives take over the district.

  • Yul bolsun

    I was told that ” it’s as plain as the nose on your face”. Well times have change!! It as plain as what’s between your legs. Any more or less is a delusion. Kids are learning who they are,they don’t need lies and confusion.

  • John D

    Morons

  • Barbara Mcmickings

    God is sick to his stomach, but will destroy the world be
    Because of this

    • Rattlerjake

      God is NOT “sick to his stomach”. God has always known what will happen, he told us in prophesy. He has told us that those who follow and believe in him will be saved before the final wrath. The life of earth is but a blink of an eye in God’s timeline!

  • Ed Campbell

    Resally hate to tell you idiots sex is not assigned at birth it is a biological FACT!

  • Skip Plummer

    Chicago is a whole other country. It’s very hard to move a whole other country overseas somewhere.

  • AmericanBelle

    …“is to ensure that all individuals who identify their gender differently from their sex assigned at birth… .”

    And this is where the entire argument falls completely apart. Sex is NOT assigned at birth. Sex is determined within 12-24 hours following intercourse when the sperm penetrates the egg. Once fertilized, the egg begins dividing into multiple cells creating a microscopic ball of hundreds of rapidly multiplying cells that will develop into your baby. By this time, sex has already been determined at the moment the sperm penetrated the egg. Chromosomes determine the sex immediately upon penetration of the egg. Females have two x chromosomes while males have an X and Y chromosomes. The sperm determines the sex of the child.

    If a sperm cell containing an X chromosome fertilizes an egg, the resulting zygote will be XX or female. If the sperm cell contains a Y chromosome, then the resulting zygote will be XY or male.

    In other words, sex is determined upon entry of the sperm into the egg where fertilization begins.

    Cutting off breasts or chopping off a penis will NOT change the biology of a human being. A person can “identify” as something they are not, but that’s all it is as they suffer from gender dysphoria.

    People with gender dysphoria have higher rates of mental health conditions. Some estimates say that 71% of people with gender dysphoria will have some other mental health diagnosis in their lifetime. That includes mood disorders, anxiety disorders, schizophrenia, depression, substance abuse, eating disorders, and suicide attempts.

    What society is doing today is ignoring the mental health issues of gender dysphoria, ignoring the problem and promoting the dysphoria while legally challenging any attempts of psychological help.

    I read a study where the doctor treated children with gender dysphoria by talking them through it. In most cases, those kids grew out of the dysphoria, just the same way as little girl tomboys grow out of their tomboy ways. The study also noted that promoting the dysphoria in children is nothing less than child abuse.

  • Jons_On

    What a waste of time. Why not spend more time on actually doing your job, you know teaching kids.

  • Nellie McConnell

    Parents are not aware of what’s being taught in public school. Muslim indoctrination is one thing we need to STOP. If Christian can’t pray in schools, then Muslims can’t either. We need to teach reading, math, history, special classes in seeing, cooking, FFA, sports, music. Parents need to be aware of indoctrination.

  • jgalbreath

    Is transgender a natural human condition or a symptom of sexual abuse. I would love to here the sergen Generals thoughts on this.

2018 TotalConservative.com