Sunday, 25/6/2017 UTC-4
Total Conservative News

Scientist Says Climate Agency Lied About Rate of Warming

A scientist who used to work for the National Climatic Data Center now says that a 2015 study from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration was politically-motivated. Dr. John Bates told The Daily Mail that the study exaggerated the rate of global warming to push international leaders to take drastic steps against carbon emissions.

According to Bates, the NOAA wanted their scientists “to discredit the notion of a global warming hiatus and rush to time the publication of the paper to influence national and international deliberations on climate policy.”

He said the agency was under pressure to refute the growing evidence for a pause in global warming that had kept temperatures stable since 1998. To that end, Bates claimed, the scientists made a “blatant attempt to intensify the impact” of warming trends using unverified data. He objected to the report at the time, but his superiors told him to take a hike. The NOAA was gearing up for the Paris climate summit, and they didn’t need pesky whistleblowers mucking up what promised to be a major political victory.

House Republicans are currently investigation the study in question. Known as the “Karl study,” it has come under congressional scrutiny for its unsupported conclusions.

“Dr. Bates’ revelations and NOAA’s obstruction certainly lend credence to what I’ve expected all along – that the Karl study used flawed data, was rushed to publication in an effort to support the president’s climate change agenda, and ignored NOAA’s own standards for scientific study,” Rep. Lamar Smith said in a statement.

Leftists see any “climate denial” as being generated by the oil industry, but they aren’t willing to admit that there are plenty of financial motivations for keeping the climate hysteria going. Including, of course, NOAA’s desire to maintain and increase their own budget. That can only be accomplished as long as they present global warming as a growing threat to the world – one that can only be countered using data they themselves generate.

That’s all well and good as long as we stick to the facts, but we left those behind a long time ago in favor of politics. Climate change is giving liberal Democrats a valuable tool in their war on capitalism. If they have to fudge the numbers here and there to get what they want, it’ll take more than one honest scientist to stop them.

 


  • jgfsmf

    They lied? I’m shocked!

    • Jimmy Quick

      No, not Demoncrats? Just look at Hillary and O-bozo. They never lie.

      • Sandy devine

        And Van Jones the communist thatbo put in place as his tzar for climate change and he worked out of the White House. A communist! Did you ever think you would have a devout communist working in our government??? We need to do something about vetting, our fore fathers tried to instill things to protect us against the communist….. vetting must become more intense and no more paying attorneys to hide your records so the public won’t know who you REALLY are! Look at the mess this country is in because we had a smooth car salesman in our WH!

      • danielzevetchin

        Quick: Are you saying that Mr. Trump has never lied. If that is what you saying how sad you are. You look so foolish.

        • dahniuru

          Quick, are you saying that if one person tells one lie then that gives everyone else the right to tell a lie of their own? You sound like a 3rd grade twit.

          • danielzevetchin

            dahniuru: It appears you are the twit. What a idiotic moron you are. My reply was about Mr. Trump. Don’t waste my time with your childish nonsense.

          • JYuma

            what about Trump?

        • Jimmy Quick

          The real story here isn’t whether or not you or anyone else has ever lied. Everybody does that, some more than others, but the Bible is very plainly worded when Jesus says, “All that ever came before me are thieves and robbers” then He follows that with this little gem: “but the sheep did not hear them.”

          Please allow me to decode that for you because I’m sure you must be mystified right about now.

          In it’s simplest terms, Christ is referring to His people as “Sheep”. Conversely, followers of Satan are referred to as “Goats”.

          Still don’t get it? Try this on for size.

          As a stone cold follower of the “Liar in Chief” Obama and the “Bag Lady” Hillary, I’d say you have put forth a fairly sturdy inditement… against yourself.

          That’s All.

        • Ramses V

          Everyone lies. Everyone. Hell even priests lie. Look at that imposter they have in white robes in Rome. He is no Roman Catholic.

  • melsbrew

    CLIMATE ENGINEERING CAUSES ANIMAL AND BIRD EXTINCTION AND OZONE 
DEPLETION



    There is a government genocide agenda taking place that has existed for a decade or more. The American People, animals, birds, fish and vegetation are the recipients of covert activities that is causing extinction on many species and killing the American People with toxins sprayed in the upper atmosphere under the guise of Solar Radiation Management. I wanted you to know what is going on, costing billions of taxpayer’s dollars a month allowing the governments military to destroy our environments and ecosystems. Millions of Americans know this exists but are helpless as to what to do. Getting the word out is all I know at this time.

    First off, the real Scientists, illustrated that over the last 19 years, US satellite data collection have shown no significant warming of the earth. That is a reliable source. The establishment government huge teams of pseudo-scientists, who are paid high incomes supported by taxpayers, and NASA are lying to the administration about global warming/climate change. Yes we do have Climate Change. It has been changing for hundreds of years, even before the industrial Revolution and will continue changing into the future. Real scientists tell us hot spots on the sun cause cyclical climate change and possibly cause ozone layer depletion.

    OBAMA LIED TO THE AMERICAN PEOPLE AND THE REST OF THE WORLD. CLIMATE CHANGE IS A PHENOMINOM THAT CANNOT POSSIBLY BE FIXED BY SPENDING BILLIONS OF DOLLARS AND IMPOSING MORE REGULATIONS ON AMERICAN INDUSTRY, DESTROYING JOBS AND POLUTING OUR ENVIRONMENT THROUGH CLIMATE ENGINEERING.

    So, what is CLIMATE ENGINEERING? 

Established in 1992, HAARP, based in Gokona, Alaska, and other locations, is a 
array of high-powered antennas that transmit, through high-frequency radio
waves, massive amounts of energy into the ionosphere (the upper layer of the
atmosphere). Check out http://www.haarp.alaska.edu and DARPA.

    

Along with heating up of the ionosphere, our underhanded
 government/military have been flying thousands of
 covert flight missions to spray aerosol chemtrails high in the atmosphere under
 the guise of Solar Radiation Management (SMR). 
By performing these procedures, they have the ability to control our jet
stream and thus the weather throughout our Country. Now you may think this is a ridiculous
 statement but this has been going on since around 1965 or so. LOOK UP IN THE SKY SEE FOR YOURSELF! Unfortunately, this technology has been improving every
 year and by 2025 they say weather modification will be perfected. This is actually weather warfare genocide 
that the federal government is committing against the American people. The chemicals they are spraying in our skies
 over us are TOXIC to include aluminum; mercury, barium and other dangerous chemicals that
 make us sick and kill humans. WHERE IS THE EPA? These toxins 
are much of the reason why so many people have allergies, lung disease, 
Alzheimer’s, dying of cancer, massive honey bees dying off, etc. We are
 breathing these toxins, they poison our lakes, poison our forest land, killing animals, birds and bees and causing animal species extinctions.

    As it turns out, while playing god with our weather
patterns, the gulfstream has shifted to over the Arctic Circle and has caused
 massive volumes of ice to disappear. 
As a result, Methane gas that has been trapped in the permafrost is escaping at
 record high rates into our atmosphere that is destroying our ozone layer and
 CAUSING global warming! Yes, this is all 
being done my the US military flying covert missions to spray our ionosphere
 with toxic heavy metals that act as a conduit for the high frequency radio
waves. The US government/military is
 waging weather warfare on the American People causing draughts in California, flooding, unusually cold winters, hurricanes, tornadoes, wet and heavy snowy winters, earthquakes, 
 etc.

    IT IS TIME THE ELECTED PEOPLE IN CONGRESS GROW A SET OF BALLS AND EXPOSE THIS RUTHLESS EXPERIMENT ON THE AMERICAN PEOPLE. DEFUND CLIMATE ENGINEERING (WEATHER MODIFICATION, GEOENGINEERING) AND USE THE HUNDREDS OF BILLIONS OF DOLLARS BEING SPENT TO STRENGTHEN OUR COUNTRY. THEIR COVERT FLIGHT MISSIONS ARE DESTROYING OUR FOOD SUPPLY AND THEY ARE IMPOSING UNNECESSARY REGULATIONS ON POWER PLANTS, INDUSTRY AND CAR MANUFACTURERS TO STOP OZONE DEPLETION. IN ACTUALITY, IT IS THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT/MILITARY THAT IS CAUSING GREAT HARM TO OUR ENVIRONMENT THE AMERICAN PEOPLE. THERE IS NO GLOBAL WARMING CAUSED BY EMISSIONS OR ANY OTHER HUMAN ACTIVITY. IT IS A HOAX STARTED BY THE RADICAL LEFT, THE UN AND ELITE GLOBALISTS LIKE GEORGE SOROS TO DESTROY INDUSTRY, JOBS, THE ENVIRONMENT AND CONTROL THE AMERICAN PEOPLE. CONTACT YOUR CONGRESSMEN AND STOP THEM NOW!!!!! TRUMP DRAIN THE SWAMP!

    • jimmy midnight

      These weather modification attempts have been going on for forty or fifty years. So has global warming. They’re NOT mutually exclusive.

      A move 2, or at least toward, sustainable energy profile would reduce pollution and thus im

      • Snake

        In you second paragraph you use the word pollution, WRONG WORD! Pollution is an entirely different subject which pertains to particulate matter and gases that do not belong in our air. CO2 and methane belong there!

        • jimmy midnight

          Right, starting with the heavy metal oxides in coal ash, spoil from mining and drilling, fracking induced earthquakes, natural gas and other hydrocarbon leakage, and so on. Exactly what I’m trying 2 get at.

          Whether extra CO2 and Methane are ‘pollution” or not is a matter of semantics, but their negative effects are real whatever we call them.

          • CO2 does not have any negative effects. It is essential for all life on earth and we are in a short supply of it at this time. Claiming CO2 causes global warming has been pushed to keep trees and plants from flourishing and limit the food supply so that people will be more for accepting the need for one world government with central control over everything and no sovereign governments or borders. We are already headed there with a world money system.

            The Deep State with all the power elite already control the Democratic Party and most of the media including Hollywood. They have run our government for over 30 years for their own profit but have gone too far pushing government, corporate and personal debt until we are headed for the biggest crash in world history. They will blame it on President Trump. Watch out for bad things to happen that President Trump cannot do anything to stop it, no one can.

          • jimmy midnight

            If, instead of parroting reactionary asswipe talking points, you actually knew something about agriculture and plant phisiology, you’d understand that CO2 levels become a limiting factor in crop yield and plant growth ONLY when both water and added fertility elements are first optimized.

            Maybe I’m missing something. Maybe some enterprising people installed irrigation gear on all our crop fields while we were sleeping last night. Oh, and they also arranged to optimize available Phosphorous, the limiting factor in real-world crop fields.

            In the interim, CO2 is the most effective and important greenhouse gas. Go stand in a tornado.

          • JYuma

            Hay, Sweeety. Just so you will know something. Tornados , are the the Product of to much C02.
            They are caused by two Air masses of different temperatures coming to gather.
            One day , you Enviros will actually read something , rather than E’Gores Bull Shit.

          • jimmy midnight

            Yes, and and the thermal energy that creates those pressure differences, is enhanced because higher CO2, etc. levels keep it bottled up in the atmosphere, rather than radiating back out into space.

          • JYuma

            Are you a Square Dancer ?

          • jimmy midnight

            Ofthe 2 of us, I’m the ultimately aware hipster, and U R the hopeless square.

          • JYuma

            Well I will agree you are continually going in Circles. Hipster ? Nah, Brainless.
            I am a Square, I will agree.
            Hipsters come and Go. Die out.
            We Squares, We just go on Forever.
            There are more Old Squares. Than there are Old hipsters.

          • Candyman

            “CO2 is the most effective and important greenhouse gas”. WRONG!!!!! Like all warmist, you completely neglect water vapor (clouds). It is by far the most prevalent, and effective greenhouse gas, and none of the heralded models used by your glorified climate “scientist” include it. That is why ALL of their predictions and projections have been utterly wrong. This hoax is nothing but a money and power grab by big government and the U.N. Here are just a couple of quotes: “We are setting ourselves the task of intentionally (changing) the free enterprise capitalist system”-Christiana Figueres, former Exec. Sec. of the U.N. Framework Convention on Climate Change. “The next world climate summit is actually an economic summit, during which the distribution of the world’s resources will be negotiated. We will redistribute, de facto, the worlds wealth by climate policy.”-Ottmar Edendorfer, Prof. of The Economics of Climate Change at the Potsdam Inst. for Climate Impact Research. This movement has nothing to do with saving the climate, and everything to do with money and power.

          • jimmy midnight

            Yeah, and there’s more water vapor in the atmosphere, too, because it’s vaporized by the extra heat bottled up in the system by enhanced CO2, etc. levels.

            Leading 2 more and larger storms, and more devastating droughts.

          • Candyman

            CO2 doesn’t cause clouds, evaporation does. Even so, if there is more water vapor, as you say, why don’t your vaunted modelers include it in their models? The amount (number) and severity of tornadoes and hurricanes has diminished over the last 10-20 years. There has been no (none) U.S. landfall of a greater than cat. three hurricane for 8-10 years. The cost associated with them has gone up for any landfall due to more development, especially along coastal regions. How about you addressing my claim that this whole movement of “green weenies” is not about the climate, but about money and power. Of course that would require you to actually look at the real data and think for yourself, so I’m not holding my breath.

          • jimmy midnight

            More heat in system means more evaporation; and clouds form from water vapor, which I’m sure is included in climate models, when relevant. The power component in this discussion is all about fossil fuel money spent 2 convince fools like you that there’s actually a controversy about this. And it was so easy, so effin’ easy, because of your preexisting anti-scientific and anti-intellectual inclinations.

            Even if climate change was a hoax, a move to an all-renewable organic was of doing and producing and living would engender a net gain in public health and available employment. What’s not 2 like about that?

          • Candyman

            Do some research, and stop spouting platitudes you hear from your masters. Your warmist “scientist” do not include water vapor in the modeling because it would show that CO2 has very little to do with climate change. That would hurt their chances of getting the BILLIONS of dollars that governments pay to “scientist” that tell them what they (the politicians) want to hear. The power we (or at least I) mention is the power of the world elites to control every aspect of the lives of us lesser people. The supposed spending of the carbon producers is dwarfed by the spending of the governments who want the power to control the masses. That includes people like you, by the way. The rulers will not care that you carried the water for their side, and followed their instructions to enslave the lesser people. You will just be one of us, a slave to the masters. As far as your contention of making a better world for employment and public health, even your people admit that if we do everything they (and you) say we should, spending trillions of dollars, destroying whole industries (coal/gas), changing our lives to conform to the dictates of the masters, it would result in a drop in the mean temperature of less than 1/2 of 1 degree by the year 2100. I see that admission as proof that their solution is not the path to a better, cleaner planet (assuming that is what they are after).

          • jimmy midnight

            Where’d U find those number? On right-wing shitbag. com?

          • Candyman

            No. I found those numbers by reading statements made by those dig-bats you call scientist (I call them enviro-fascist). They are stupid enough to point out that everything that they want us to do will accomplish virtually nothing. If you want to actually know what your masters want to achieve (I doubt you do, ignorance is bliss), read “Behind the Green Mask”. It’s an analysis of the Agenda 21 paper drafted at the Rio climate shindig. They have our (meaning your and my) future all planned out, and it turns out that they control all the wealth and goodies while we get shit on. So I guess you could say that your masters are the ones trying to make us shitbags. If you have the guts, find the book and read it, the truth hurts.

          • JYuma

            You may wish to give him this
            .realclimatescience.com/ 2

          • JYuma

            https-//realclimatescience.com/2016/11/why-does-the-us-space-agency-ignore-satellites/
            Just one of the List of Facts for poor old Jimmy to have read to him.

          • JYuma

            Jimmy Dimwit,
            You are wrong on 99%, of your postings.
            Co2, is one of the most important chemicals in the Atmosphere.
            It makes things Grow.
            It does, NOT, cause Droughts, nor Hurricanes.

          • JYuma

            You are 90%, correct[one of the few] about the cause of Global Warming , Climate change, what ever you wish to call it.
            It is based 15%% on money, Control of the people on this Big Blue Pear that we infest.
            5%, is from the fact that well thinking, un- educated, people, believe that the problem of Climate Change is Man made.
            The other 80% of the Cause of Global Climate Change is the Fact or the Realtion between the Sun, The Earth, Earths tilt. The Amount of Sun spots on the Sun.
            It has in NO WAY, been the cause of Man.
            Were you ,to research, the History of the Weather, on this planet. You would find that from the time that it Solidified, until today the weather has changed , World Wide because of those Factors.
            I am not singling you out for ritrcul. For this is not ridicule

          • Candyman

            I think we are 100% in agreement (although I think the 15% money thing is way off) I think that the reasons you state for our climate are spot on, and I will even throw in that our solar systems orbit around the Milky Way may have an influence. It is a fact that in our trek around the galaxy, the solar system bobs up and down, like a horse on a merry-go-round, every 20-25 thousand years, which closely parallels our ice ages. I do not put any faith in “scientist” who claim that the consensus is in and the discussion is over, while they distort their data to fit their desired outcome, and refuse to share their work that shows how they reached that outcome.

          • JYuma

            You correct. Few people know this.
            Have you ever heard of Bio Rythym’s?

          • Candyman

            Yes, I’ve heard of them. They are an attempt to explain a persons behavior by using certain rhythms or cycles. I do not think that can be used to explain the past, or predict the future, of the Earth’s climate, but I do know that we are constantly discovering cycles that the Earth and Sun go through, and that we have not found them all, nor completely understand the ones we know about.

          • JYuma

            Bio Rhythm’s, are cycles all things in this Universe has, moves through.
            They show the Cycles all happenings. One may look to the past , chart it, then have a good idea of what maybe in the Future.
            Your Daily Weather Report, is figured out this way.
            If one researches the Weather for the last 100 years, they will find the over that time, it as gotten warmer, colder, Wetter Dryer, in Cycles. It may be of interest to you to look at these last 100 years, read the News reports. you will find the in 1910, 32, 44, etc.[examples] there have been similar panics about it . Cycles. Bio Rhythm’s.
            Do you know that for the Most part, the Weather people that report it , only go back as far 1979 to get their records?
            Last year, 2016 was NOT the Hottest, there have been others Hotter,. They were before 2016, so were not figured in.
            That from 1850 to Date , that the Rise in Temperature has not be in Deg’s. But .o something in Deg’s.?

          • Snake

            Hey dumbasss! CO2 is NOT a greenhouse gas! There is NO SUCH THING! Gases simply absorb heat and then release it as the temperature changes in the atmosphere, they trap nothing. Try looking up physics – only a liquid or solid can trap anything! A greenhouse is made of solid surfaces, not gas! And considering that you can’t even spell physiology, I doubt you have an ounce of agricultural experience!

          • Snake

            You really need to refresh yourself on basic science! CO2 has NO NEGATIVE EFFECTS! CO2 is an essential part of the O2 cycle and it’s percentage is so minuscule in our atmosphere that it could double and have little effect, other than that plants would do far better! Basic natural gases like CO2 and methane are NOT POLLUTION!

          • jimmy midnight

            Increased CO2 levels will enhance plant growth ONLY when water and available nutrients are first optimized. Doubling its atmospheric level wouldn’t help crop yields, but would worsen global warming.

            Methane does occur naturally, chlorofluorocarbons don’t. Methane level increases, like CO2 level increases R attributable 2 human activity. A characteristic they have in common is marginally adding 2 climate change.

            See how I used the terms, “global warming,” and, “climate change,” in the same sense? That’s because they’re the same thing.

          • JYuma

            Only one Little problem with your posts. With your Ideas.
            There is no Global Warming.
            As you , your fellow Fanatics have been Bleating to All the World.
            Have you any IDEA what the Rise in Temperature in the Last 160 years has been?
            Have you ever researched the amount of C02, Methane was 5,000, 50,000 years ago. There are records from those dates. Records found in Ice Cores.

          • jimmy midnight

            Yeah, and from what I could gather, CO2 was around 200 ppm. 4 thousands of years prior to beginning of industrial age, now it’s 300-plus, heading 4 350.

          • JYuma

            50,000 years ago it was Higher. Just Animals, . No cars.
            C02 makes things GROW. Doesn’t Kill things.
            How much has the temp rose in the Last 150 years?

          • jimmy midnight

            Maybe U and I can agree on a data source for CO2 levels, and maybe we can’t. As U may already know, data R also manipulable.’

            Again, my understanding is that both CO2 levels and overall temperatures have increased more over the last thirty years, than over the previous eighty. Furthermore, each of the last three years has been hotter than all previous years.

            CO2 levels of 50K years ago may be irrelevant. I’ve bee tryin’ 2 explain 2 U, through numerous exchanges, that today’s plant life is well-adapted to these circa 200 ppm levels, so that ONLY (I know I’m repeating this 2 U, and might well ask, “How many effing times does it take?”)

            So I repeat yet again that enhanced CO2 levels will increase crop yields, but ONLY! ONLY! ONLY!!!!!!! when water and available nutrients R first optimized. So, when U comin’ 2 install the irrigation systems?

          • JYuma

            Yes weather stats. Just like all other stats are manipulated. Again, You are correct about the need of water for things to grow.
            As for the last three years being the Hottest? Pure Bull.
            Here is something that I hopewell help you.

            Header

            Prominent Scientists Declare Climate Claims Ahead of UN Summit ‘Irrational’ – ‘Based On Nonsense’ – ‘Leading us down a false path’

            MIT Climate Scientist Dr. Richard Lindzen: ‘Demonization of CO2 is irrational at best and even modest warming is mostly beneficial.’ – ‘When someone says this is the warmest temperature on record. What are they talking about? It’s just nonsense. This is a very tiny change period.’

            Princeton Physicist Dr. Will Happer: ‘Policies to slow CO2 emissions are really based on nonsense. We are being led down a false path. To call carbon dioxide a pollutant is really Orwellian. You are calling something a pollutant that we all produce. Where does that lead us eventually?’

            Greenpeace Co-Founder Dr. Patrick Moore: ‘We are dealing with pure political propaganda that has nothing to do with science.’

            By: Marc Morano – Climate Depot

            November 19, 2015 6:10 PM

            with 2855 comments

            Note: CFACT’s new skeptical documentary, Climate Hustle, is set to rock the UN climate summit with red carpet’world premiere in Paris.

            #

            From Left to Right: Dr. Will Happer, Dr. Richard Lindzen & Dr. Patrick Moore

            AUSTIN, Texas – A team of prominent scientists gathered in Texas today at a climate summit to declare that fears of man-made global warming were “irrational” and “based on nonsense” that “had nothing to do with science.” They warned that “we are being led down a false path” by the upcoming UN climate summit in Paris.

            The scientists appeared at a climate summit sponsored by the Texas Public Policy Foundation. The summit in Austin was titled: “At the Crossroads: Energy & Climate Policy Summit.”

            Climate Scientist Dr. Richard Lindzen, an emeritus Alfred P. Sloan Professor of Meteorology at the Department of Earth, Atmospheric and Planetary Sciences at MIT, derided what he termed climate “catastrophism.”

            “Demonization of CO2 is irrational at best and even modest warming is mostly beneficial,” Lindzen said.

            Lindzen cautioned: “The most important thing to keep in mind is – when you ask ‘is it warming, is it cooling’, etc. — is that we are talking about something tiny (temperature changes) and that is the crucial point.”

            Lindzen also challenged the oft-repeated UN IPCC claim that most of warming over past 50 years was due to mankind.

            “People get excited over this. Is this statement alarming? No,” Lindzen stated.

            “We are speaking of small changes 0.25 Celsius would be about 51% of the recent warming and that strongly suggests a low and inconsequential climate sensitivity – meaning no problem at all,” Lindzen explained.

            “I urge you when looking at a graph, check the scales! The uncertainty here is tenths of a degree,” he noted.

            “When someone points to this and says this is the warmest temperature on record. What are they talking about? It’s just nonsense. This is a very tiny change period. And they are arguing over hundredths of a degree when it is uncertain in tenths of a degree,” Lindzen said.

            “And the proof that the uncertainty is tenths of a degree are the adjustments that are being made. If you can adjust temperatures to 2/10ths of a degree, it means it wasn’t certain to 2/10ths of a degree,” he said. (Also See: Scientists balk at ‘hottest year’ claims: Ignores Satellites showing 18 Year ‘Pause’ – ‘We are arguing over the significance of hundredths of a degree’ – The ‘Pause’ continues)

            “The UN IPCC wisely avoided making the claim that 51% of a small change in temperature constitutes a problem. They left this to the politicians and anyone who took the bait,” he said.

            Lindzen noted that National Academy of Sciences president Dr. Ralph Cicerone has even admitted that there is no evidence for catastrophic claims of man-made global warming. See: Backing away from climate alarm? NAS Pres. Ralph Cicerone says ‘we don’t have that kind of evidence’ to claim we are ‘going to fry’ from AGW

            Lindzen also featured 2006 quotes from Scientist Dr. Miike Hulme, Professor of Environmental Sciences at the University of East Anglia, and Director of the Tyndall Centre for Climate Change Research, admitting that claims of a climate catastrophe were not the “language of science.”

            “The discourse of catastrophe is a campaigning device,” Hulme wrote to the BBC in 2006. “The language of catastrophe is not the language of science. To state that climate change will be ‘catastrophic’ hides a cascade of value-laden assumptions which do not emerge from empirical or theoretical science,” Hulme wrote.

            “Is any amount of climate change catastrophic? Catastrophic for whom, for where, and by when? What index is being used to measure the catastrophe?” Hulme continued.

            Lindzen singled out Secretary of State John Kerry for his ‘ignorance’ on science.

            “John Kerry stands alone,” Lindzen said. “Kerry expresses his ignorance of what science is,” he added.

            Lindzen also criticized EPA Chief Gina McCarthy’s education: “I don’t want to be snobbish, but U Mass Boston is not a very good school,” he said to laughter.

            Lindzen concluded his talk by saying: “Learn how to identify claims that have no alarming implications and free to say ‘So what?’”

            Princeton Physicist Dr. Will Happer, who has authored over 200 peer-reviewed papers, called policies to reduce CO2 “based on nonsense.”

            “Policies to slow CO2 emissions are really based on nonsense. They are all based on computer models that do not work. We are being led down a false path.

            “Our breath is not that different from a power plant,” he continued.

            “To call carbon dioxide a pollutant is really Orwellian. You are calling something a pollutant that we all produce. Where does that lead us eventually?” he asked.

            “Coal, formed from ancient CO2, is a benefit to the world. Coal is CO2 from ancient atmospheres. We are simply returning CO2 to the atmosphere from which it came when you burn coal. And it’s a good thing since it is at very low levels in the atmosphere. We are in a CO2 famine. It is very, very low,” Happer explained.

            Happer continued: “CO2 will be beneficial and crop yields will increase.” “More CO2 will be a very significant benefit to agriculture,” he added.

            Happer then showed a picture of polluted air in China with the caption: “Real pollution in Shanghai.”

            “If you can see it, it’s not CO2,” Happer said.

            “If plants could vote, they would vote for coal,” Happer declared.

            Happer also rebutted the alleged 97% consensus.

            “97% of scientists have often been wrong on many things,” he said.

            Ecologist and Greenpeace founding member Dr. Patrick Moore discussed the benefits of rising carbon dioxide in the atmosphere.

            “Let’s celebrate CO2!” Moore declared.

            “We know for absolute certain that carbon dioxide is the stuff of life, the foundation for life on earth,” Moore said.

            “We are dealing with pure political propaganda that has nothing to do with science,” he continued.

            “The deserts are greening from rising CO2,” he added.

            “Co2 has provided the basis of life for at least 3.5 billion years,” Moore said.

          • jimmy midnight

            “Catastrophic,” isn’t the language of science. Neither is calling a widely accepted theory with which U happen 2 disagree, “Pure political propaganda.”

            Scientific professionals who are still expressing doubts, and even suggesting conspiracies, are likely still collecting interest on the generous bribery (prostitution) money they’ve received 4 their splendid efforts at muddying a view which should B totally clear by now.

          • JYuma

            You, Are a Illiterate Imbecile.
            I gave you a place to start your enlighten meant, of the Facts about what is Happening on and to this Big Blue Pear that we Infest.
            You choose to ignore it, speak your Uneducated , mindless Bull. That you have been feed.
            I wonder, Is thinking , researching a subject too much for you Pea sized Brain?

          • jimmy midnight

            Sorry, don’t feel obligated 2 read your cherry-picked sources. As far as I can tell, your research in this area begins and ends with denialist partisans.

            When I googled, “CO2 levels historic,” which doesn’t strike me as favoring a side, I found nothing comparable 2 what you’ve pointed up. Furthermore, it all seemed 2 contradict your assertions about the elevated CO2 levels 50K years Before Present.

            Your, “..a illiterate imbecile, ” “..Unedcated , mindless Bull. That you have been feed,” and “…you Pea sized..” show me that in addition 2 being an irredeemably clueless, thoughtless, heartless and shameless partisan, you R also an ignorant 1.

            I don’t absolutely rule out the possibility that you’re sincerely trying to get at the actual facts, but do retain some doubts.

          • JYuma

            As I stated before!
            “You, Are a Illiterate Imbecile.”
            I will agree with you on one thing howsoever
            I am a Shameless Partisan. A Partisan, when it comes to this country, The Constitution of These United States Of America.
            I, Also will Shout it to the World, that I am.

          • JYuma

            “Catastrophe is the Words that Flow out the Oral Orifices of Gore, others like him.
            In the 1990’s, He Claimed to the WORLD that by 2005, New York City would be UNDER water, from Global Warming. He Claimed that there would be no Ice at the North Pole, the South Pole would be almost denude of Ice.
            Non of that has Came to pass. The Seas have not Flooded the Land,.
            Have You any Idea, an WAG [wild ass guess ] of how much the Temperature of this Planet has risen in the Last 100 years?
            IF you know how much the temp. has risen . Please be so KIND as to inform Us, ME.
            FSOBAHI, if I have ever seen on your are it.

          • JYuma

            You just stated the Difference between you Climate IDIOTS and those of us that believe your Completely Ignorant.
            You deal in Theory.
            We deal in FACTS!

    • maxx

      It’s NASA’s own satellite views that expose the lies. Both polar ice caps increase and decrease all the time. Have been doing that for thousands of years. Our very own star, the SUN has more to do with the climate and weather conditions on Earth than anything else. We know all about the solar activity cycles the Sun has been experiencing for hundreds of years. The climate scammers would have us ignore the recorded history of the Suns activity in favor of their fictional account supported by nothing but lies, lies and more lies and data manipulation from liberal activist pseudo-scientists. Every single prediction made by Gore and his nut jobs have been proven to be wrong when the did not occur.

    • Snake

      Your claim, “The establishment government … scientists … and NASA are lying to the
      administration about…” is incorrect. Those pseudo-scientists and NASA are lying to “We the People”; they are creating the false information FOR the administration because they are part of the corrupt administration!

    • Trillions of dollars are provided by our government to push alternative energy and cause companies to reduce their carbon footprint. The truth is that we need lots more CO2 for trees and plants to flourish. We could increase the CO2 in our atmosphere 9 times and not cause any ill effects. For people who will not believe that people cannot cause climate change, I have compiled the following to a list of links to real scientist providing factual information about global warming and climate change.
      ​​Climate Change Links – https://docs.google.com/document/d/1XUKeF0YbcbWEV0SKKP9HfnN0POAqOMbDLrrvlJG4DDU/pub

    • Sharrell Burcham

      I watch the chem trails all the time. They spray them out and it is usually side by side and marked with an X. They as the day goes on they spread out and we have overcast skies. I have heard of people catching rain water that falls thru these chem trail clouds and the rain has these metals and substances that you mentioned.

      • JYuma

        Your not watching Chem. Trails. You are watching Exhaust trails for the Jet engines of the planes.
        I do not understand people that are so Fearful that they can not research what happens when a plane fly’s in High Moisturized air.

    • JYuma

      I see that you are one of the People that’s studied it for a bit.
      To Bad it was from the wrong information outlets.
      However, You are no where correct in ay of your statements.
      All that you wrote is Pure Bull Shite..

  • VirgoVince

    STOP wasting time and money on this ugly lefturd liberal BULLSHIT and SHUT IT DOWN, once and for all!!
    NO MORE, KNOCK IT OFF!!

  • Whaledriver

    Global warming/climate change involves lies?

    Government pressured scientists to use false data?

    Say it isn’t so!

  • James Newberry

    Whoever would have thought that the USA would be subjected to the likes of a Goebbels or TASS or any other propaganda vehicle? The NYT and WaPO continue to carry on the propaganda. We have experienced it for the last eight years. So many have bought it hook, line and sinker! particularly the younger se, but then again look who Hitler brain washed so much that he had 12 year olds in uniform before the end of the war. What a sad state. I just the likes of Trump can at least put on the brakes and slow this thing down. I don’t know what it is going to take to stop it, but we made a first big step electing Trump!

    • albertbryson

      I don’t press. They are not telling us the truth. Trump should throw the press from the White House. Drop the news briefings and press conferences. He needs to speak to the American people directly.

      • maxx

        There is no press any longer. The media has been the propaganda arm of the Left for about 60 years now. Maybe some reforms need to be demanded.

    • maxx

      The people responsible for the hoax should be arrested and prosecuted for fraud leading to the blatant robbery of the tax payers of this country. Then an appropriate punishment applied. Let the taxpaying public decide what the punishment should be when they find out how much the Climategate hoax has cost them in dollars and cents. Just the ethanol mandate alone has cost the average American hundreds of dollars each year, while the politicians that knew the mandate was coming became owners and stock holders in the ethanol industry. Ethanol is less efficient therefore creating the need to use more of it to travel the same distance. Ethanol causes more indirect pollution because billions of gallons of water are required to produce it. Ethanol took food stock off the market causing a increase in the cost of food. Ethanol caused auto manufacturers to need to make expensive changes to engine technology which was passed on to purchasers. Ethanol has been a multi-trillion dollar boondoggle.

  • Estoban

    Dorothy! Pay no attention to that man in the white lab coat behind the curtain. He is a snake oil salesman, a grifter, a charlatan. In other words, he is a climate scientist.

  • albertbryson

    Well, Climate change and global warming are the greatest hoax ever pertained on the whole world. Scientists have been lying to us for you. These scientists need to be fired and jailed for their crimes.

    • maxx

      Yes indeed and that should include Al Gore and his crowd of criminal activists.

      • albertbryson

        Thank you, we should add the climate control politicians like Gore and Obama.

      • Joe Toy

        Hey maxx, you mean Al ‘An Inconvenient Lie’ Gore? Oh yeah, that smuck who made Millions of $$$ with companies selling solar, windmills, etc. by buying their stock low and selling it high before their businesses crashed and burned. How I wish he could be looking at striped sunshine.

      • Sandy devine

        Yes siree!! Al Gore, Van Jones, Soros, Obama and. Any many more you would recognize have an investment in a huge climate/global warming foundation they set up just before O was elected so that’s why he had been pushing it hard. They will benefit greatly monetarily !!! Need anything else be said.

    • 1baronrichsnot1

      Al gore is the king of hoaxsters, he has made millions selling his carbon credits to unsuspecting fools who believe his stories! Have you noticed a demonrat never produces anything? Only liars and scammers of the people!

      • William McClure

        I apologize on behalf of the State of Tennessee for allowing Al Gore be elected to anything above dogcatcher

        • JYuma

          You could have stopped at Allowed.

    • Lizzie2

      ” THERE ARE NONE SO BLIND THAN THOSE WHO REFUSE TO SEE”

  • Rick D.

    As Gomer Pyle would say: “SURPRISE! SURPRISE! SURPRISE!” Actually, one should NOT be surprised. Anything goes if it promotes and perpetuates the lies of the liberal left!!

  • Denis Vandale

    Gosh, politicians lying, can it be!

  • Morton99

    This about as weak a leader article as I have seen. One scientist huh ! Forget the rate of planet heating – just look at the health hazards that fossil fuels have on biological life. No not black lung diseases in Kentucky – how about asthma in the polluted streets of human cities.

    • jimmy midnight

      Global warming or not, fossil fuel way of doing things it TOXIC, so you’ve got things in appropriate perspective. Identifying the problem is a necessary, though small, first step toward solutions.

      Of course it’s actually going on, and being caused by human activities, mostly fossil fuel burning.

  • Doxie

    It’s not the first time they’ve lied in order to perpetuate the myth of global warming.

  • pineapple

    For your edification concerning the global warming hoax, I recommend that you read the following books.
    “Unstoppable Global Warming Every 1500 Years” by S. Freed Singer and Dennis T. Avery
    “Warming and Environmentalism” by Christopher Horner
    “The Really Inconvenient Truths” by Ian Murray
    “Climategate” by veteran meteorologist Brian Sussman.
    “Red Hot Lies” by Christopher C. Horner.

    Your Move, Global Warming Alarmists, Science has Exposed Your Unwarranted Hysteria.
    By Peter Ferrara
    Who will decide American public policy on the issue of potentially catastrophic man caused global warming? The answer is you and me, through the democratic process that governs our country.
    So spare me the comments saying Shut Up, you are not a scientist and your commentary here is not peer reviewed scientific literature, so you have no business even talking about it. That is an anti-democratic, brown shirt tactic meant to foreclose public discussion and debate, which has been the dominant strategy of those trying to force their unwelcome ideological agenda on the rest of us through this issue. What does that alone tell you about who is right about the actual science?
    But citizens participating in the democratic process do have a responsibility to become informed about the scientific debate over global warming. And that is my function here in focusing on the publication this week of Climate Change Reconsidered II, authored by the Nongovernmental International Panel on Climate Change (NIPCC), and published by the Heartland Institute. The NIPCC
    “is an international panel of scientists and scholars who came together to understand the causes and consequences of climate change. NIPCC has no formal attachment to or sponsorship from any government or governmental agency. It is wholly independent of political pressures or influences and therefore is not predisposed to produce politically motivated conclusions or policy recommendations. NIPCC seeks to objectively analyze and interpret data and facts without conforming to any specific agenda. This organizational structure and purpose stand in contrast to those of the United Nations’ Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), which is government-sponsored, politically motivated, and predisposed to believing that climate change is a problem in need of a U.N. solution.”
    I can attest to you that the team of 50 scientists producing the 1,200 pages of calm, reasoned, dispassionate science in the report did achieve their goal of objectively analyzing and interpreting data and facts without conforming to any specific agenda. They carefully demonstrate the inconvenient facts about the world’s climate discussed below, and when you have that any politicization would just detract from the presentation, as Al Gore shows in his global warming political harangues.
    The report is “comprehensive, objective, and faithful to the scientific method.” Moreover, it is “double peer reviewed,” in that it discusses thousands of peer reviewed articles published in scientific journals, and is itself peer reviewed. That is in sharp contrast to President Obama’s own EPA, which issued its “endangerment finding” legally authorizing regulation of carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions, without submitting the finding to its own peer review board established by federal law precisely for that purpose. What were they so afraid of if 97% of scientists supposedly agree with them? That violation of federal law has now been challenged in court, and is pending before the U.S. Supreme Court. But this would not be the first time that the Administration of this lawless President has openly flouted the law.
    Check out Climate Change Reconsidered II for yourself. It is the top, No. 1, presentation of the other side to the Democrat Party’s controlled media on the issue. If you want to see what that is, this is your one stop source. If you personally want to believe that using the traditional, carbon based energy sources that have fueled the Industrial Revolution and modern prosperity will destroy the planet, and that we can fuel the modern economy with windmills and dancing on sunbeams at minimal net cost, then it is your personal right to pursue your alternative reality fully ignorant of your errors.
    The authors of the report do not deny that there is some effect of warming the planet from mankind’s emissions of CO2, primarily from use of traditional carbon fuels such as oil, coal, and natural gas. The argument is over how big of an effect that is, how that compares to natural causes of climate change, and whether the human caused effect threatens a catastrophe, or even severe distress, to human civilization and the environment. The conclusion of the report is that the U.N.’s IPCC has exaggerated the amount of global warming likely to occur due to mankind’s emissions of CO2, and the warming that human civilization will cause as a result “is likely to be modest and cause no net harm to the global environment or to human well-being.” The primary, dominant cause of global climate change is natural causes, not human effects, the report concludes. “The hypothesis of human-caused global warming comes up short not merely of ‘full scientific certainty’ but of reasonable certainty or even plausibility,” the report states.
    The fundamentals of the argument is that CO2 is not some toxic industrial gas, but a natural, trace gas constituting just 0.038% of the atmosphere. For readers disadvantaged by excessive exposure to the party propaganda organ called the New York Times, that is less than 4/100ths of one percent. The report states, “At the current level of 400 parts per million, we still live in a CO2-starved world. Atmospheric levels (of CO2) 15 times greater existed during the pre-Cambrian period (about 550 million years ago) without known adverse effects,” such as catastrophic global warming.
    Moreover, CO2 is actually essential to all life on the planet. Plants need CO2 to grow and conduct photosynthesis, which is the natural process that creates food for animals and fish at the bottom of the food chain. The increase of CO2 in the atmosphere that has occurred due to human emissions has actually increased agricultural growth and output as a result, causing actually an increased greening of the planet. So has any warming caused by such human emissions, as minor warming increases agricultural growth. The report states, “CO2 is a vital nutrient used by plants in photosynthesis. Increasing CO2 in the atmosphere ‘greens’ the planet and helps feed the growing human population.”
    In addition, the temperature impact of increased concentrations of CO2 declines logarithmically. Or as the report says, “Atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO2)…exerts a diminishing warming effect as its concentration increases.” That means there is a natural limit to how much increased CO2 can effectively warm the planet, as the effect of more and more CO2 ultimately becomes negligible as CO2 concentration grows. Maybe that is why even with many times more CO2 in the atmosphere in the deep past, there was no catastrophic global warming.
    What has been devastating to the theory of catastrophic, man caused, global warming is that there has been no significant increase in global temperatures for 16 years, even a slight cooling in more recent years. Yet, during that time mankind’s emissions of CO2 that were supposed to be causing global warming continued to explode, with one third of all CO2 added to the atmosphere since the industrial revolution occurring during this period. The Economist magazine shocked the global warming establishment with an article in March that began with this lede:
    “OVER the past 15 years air temperatures at the Earth’s surface have been flat while greenhouse-gas emissions have continued to soar. The world added roughly 100 billion tonnes of carbon to the atmosphere between 2000 and 2010. That is about a quarter of all the CO2 put there by humanity since 1750. And yet, as James Hansen, the head of NASA’s Goddard Institute for Space Studies, observes, ‘the five-year mean global temperature has been flat for a decade. . . .’”
    The facts recounted above are not in actual dispute, even though several commenters relying on too much party controlled media were shocked to hear last April that anyone could think that global warming stopped 16 years ago. But these facts already demonstrate that the theory of catastrophic, anthropogenic, global warming is dubious at best.
    Climate Change Reconsidered II explains the argument of the UN’s IPCC that the world is still threatened with global warming catastrophe, which will be repeated in the next IPCC report in a few weeks. What is shocking is to see is how meager the argument is for the great, global warming bogeyman. You are welcome to check out the UN report to see for yourself.
    The supposedly scientific foundation for the IPCC argument is based on the temperature projections of 73 global climate models developed by various scientists favored by the IPCC. These climate models are not science. They are literally speculative stories about the climate, especially since exactly zero of the models have been validated by past temperature experience. The scientific method involves testing a falsifiable hypothesis with experiments and evidence. Speculative model projections do not involve any such falsifiable hypothesis, and are not an exercise of the scientific method.
    Even the modelers themselves recognize and admit that their models are not even designed to produce predictions of future temperatures, but just “what if” projections of the results of unproven assumptions, to provide some indications, not scientific proof, of possible future scenarios. The Climate Change Reconsidered report states, “The science literature is replete with admissions by leading climate modelers that forcings and feedback are not sufficiently well understood, that data are insufficient or too unreliable, and that computer power is insufficient to resolve important climate processes.”
    Moreover, none of the models take into account the Pacific and Atlantic Ocean temperature cycles resulting from the churning of colder water from the deep to the surface, where it is warmed by the sun, which have been shown to affect global temperatures. None of the models take into account as well solar activity cycles such as variations in solar magnetic fields or in the flux of cosmic rays, which are also known to significantly affect climate, and have produced major climate changes of the past, such as the Little Ice Age, particularly pronounced from roughly 1650 AD to 1850 AD, the Medieval Warm period from about 950 AD to 1250 AD, during which global temperatures were higher than today, and the early 20th century Warming Period from 1910 to 1940 AD.
    These are the reasons why the projections of all of these models have now diverged so strongly from the actual temperatures experienced over the past 15 years, and further back for most all, even back to the 1980s, as shown in the nearby graph. The actual atmospheric temperatures as recorded by U.S. weather satellites and weather balloons are shown by the two lines at the bottom of the graph, connecting the squares or the circles. The average of the temperature models is the solid line going through the spaghetti of lines representing the projections of each of the models, well above the real world temperatures, with the divergence growing and growing. The source of that graph is Dr. Roy Spencer, award winning NASA scientist monitoring the global atmospheric temperatures as measured by U.S. satellites, and a contributor to Climate Change Reconsidered, as produced for testimony before the Environment and Public Works Committee of the United States Senate. Spencer, R.W. 2013. Statement to the Environment and Public Works Committee, 19 July 2013, Washington, DC. This sharp divergence of the projections of the IPCC models has been another devastating development for the theory of catastrophic, man caused, global warming.
    Besides the models, the UN’s IPCC tries to argue that circumstantial evidence is consistent with its theory of catastrophic, man caused global warming if it were true. This again is not the scientific method. As Karl Popper explained, “observations in science are useful to falsify hypotheses, and cannot [rigorously] prove” any hypothesis is correct. In other words, the true scientific method involves a null hypothesis which is the logical opposite of the hypothesis being explored, and is assumed correct until the evidence proves it false. That is because experimental or physical evidence can only rigorously prove something false, not prove it true.

    But as Climate Change Reconsidered explains, “the IPCC assumes its implicit hypothesis [catastrophic, man-caused global warming is real] is correct and that its only duty is to collect evidence and make plausible arguments in the hypothesis’s favor.” This is political science, not actual science.
    Climate Change Reconsidered shows that it is the evidence that the IPCC tries to marshall in favor of its catastrophic, man caused, global warming hypothesis that is false, falsifying the hypothesis. The Climate Change report states, “Global sea ice cover remains similar in area to that at the start of satellite observations in 1979, with ice shrinkage in the Arctic Ocean since then being offset by growth around Antartica.” In other words, polar ice is not melting or disappearing globally. The report adds, “The data on global glacial history and ice mass balance do not support the claims made by the IPCC that CO2 emissions are causing most glaciers today to retreat and melt.”
    The report also states, “Sea level rise is not accelerating. The global average sea level continues to increase at its long term rate of 1-2 millimeters per year….Unusual sea-level rise is therefore not drowning Pacific coral islands, nor are the islands being abandoned by ‘climate refugees.’” In other words, yeah, the sea level has been rising. Exactly the same as it has been for thousands of years, since the end of the last actual Ice Age. It has nothin
    Moreover, the pattern of global temperature change has not followed rising atmospheric CO2 since the advent of the Industrial Revolution. It follows instead the up and down patterns of ocean churning temperature cycles and of solar activity, such as sun spots that were so influential in causing the Little Ice Age that ended roughly a couple of hundred years ago. That is one reason why Climate Change Reconsidered concludes that natural causes, not human factors like CO2 emissions, have predominated in causing climate change.
    Indeed, the Climate Change Reconsidered report states, “The recently quiet Sun and extrapolation of solar cycle patterns into the future suggest a planetary cooling may occur over the next few decades.” That follows my own reporting in recent columns in this space of the potential rise of a long term temperature decline based on these solar trends, which is the first reporting on such developments anywhere near the establishment press in increasingly repressed America. Much of our national press these days behaves voluntarily in regard to the Obama Administration the way that the old Soviet press used to do under compulsion in regard to the old communist dictatorships in the now dissolved old Soviet Union.
    One small town California columnist published a criticism of one of my previous columns on this subject in this space using a chart fed to him by a local environmental propagandist. The hapless local dutifully published the chart fed to him showing a line supposedly representing global temperatures in the 20th century with a sharp upward slope. The line was drawn through the real temperature history of cyclical ups and downs representing the actual cyclical natural causes of global temperature changes. But the overconfident local columnist, gleefully repeating that the graph proved man caused ultimately catastrophic global warming was real, also failed to notice that the scale on his graph was in tenths of a degree. He should go back to his source and ask for a graph of 19th century global temperature increases on the same scale, which would show a far sharper upward slope. Were CO2 emissions higher in the 19th century than in the 20th? Or maybe the dominant factor was the end of the Little Ice Age in the 19th century, a natural not human cause.
    Enough has been discussed already to logically and indeed scientifically disprove, or falsify, the invasive theory of catastrophic, anthropogenic global warming. But Climate Change Reconsidered provides another 1200 pages of logical and scientific argument, backed up by thousands of peer reviewed citations that could not all be discussed here. If your head hurts at this point because of overexposure to the New York Times and the resulting disconnection or alienation from reality, Climate Change Reconsidered is the cure for what ails you.

    • maxx

      If this post is your very own original work or not I am very glad you put it in. I read every word and it is indeed extremely comprehensive in content. As Gores global warming cronys liked to say “it is settled science”. The majority of people as well as real climate scientists say “B.S.”. Thanks for your comments.

      • pineapple

        “The
        first phase of the European Unions Emissions Trading Scheme (ETS), which runs
        from 2005 to 2007 was a failure.

        Huge over
        allocatiion of permits to polluters lead to a collapse in the price of carbon
        form 33 to 0.02 per metric tonne,
        meaning that the system did not reduce emissions at all.

        Worse
        still, since some countries (such as the U.K.) had set such tough quotas on
        emissions, and others set lax targets, the system acted as a wealth transfer
        mechanism, effectively subsidizing polluters in states with more stringent
        allocations. Overall there are about 6 per cent more permits than pollution.
        However, the U.K. has to buy about 22 million tonnes worth of permits a
        year while firms in France and Germany
        could sell off a surplus of around 28 and 23 million tonnes respectively.

        Finally,
        the ETS in phase one was not a real market — instead of auctioning off permits
        to pollute, member states allocated them free of charge to companies based on how many the government
        believed thay needed. This created severe distortions.

        Large
        companies which lobbied for more permits than thry needed were able to sell
        them off at a profit. Other institutions like hospital trusts — proved less
        effective at lobbying.

        They got
        too few permits and therefore had to pay into the system.”

    • THANK YOU for this add to the conversation. Too many people just accept the lie that there is some kind of consensus or that the science is settled.We are seeing even now the fascist brown shirt tactics of the left trying to shout down any and all who disagree with them. You have given us some VERY forceful answers to their smear campaign. I will share this because I do love the truth.

      • pineapple

        Following is an article on the cap and trade scheme that was implemented in Europe. It was a disaster, much like Obamacare.

        “The first phase of the European Unions Emissions Trading Scheme (ETS), which runs from 2005 to 2007 was a failure.

        Huge over allocation of permits to polluters lead to a collapse in the price of carbon form 33 to 0.02 per metric tonne, meaning that the system did not reduce emissions at all.

        Worse still, since some countries (such as the U.K.) had set such tough quotas on emissions, and others set lax targets, the system acted as a wealth transfer mechanism, effectively subsidizing polluters in states with more stringent allocations. Overall there are about 6 per cent more permits than pollution. However, the U.K. has to buy about 22 million tonnes worth of permits a year while firms in France and Germany
        could sell off a surplus of around 28 and 23 million tonnes respectively.

        Finally, the ETS in phase one was not a real market — instead of auctioning off permits to pollute, member states allocated them free of charge to companies based on how many the government
        believed they needed. This created severe distortions.

        Large companies which lobbied for more permits than thry needed were able to sell them off at a profit. Other institutions like hospital trusts — proved less effective at lobbying.

        They got too few permits and therefore had to pay into the system.”

  • liberaldisgust

    Oh no , they lied to support an Obama agenda …… gee what else is a lie …..

  • Remember the 70’s ? the same rectums bringing us global warming were bringing us Global Cooling ? Using the same language and even some of the same charts. Now they are pushing Climate Change. Now for the FIRST time there is actually some truth.
    Siberia was once a jungle, The Rockies were once under water, The Middle East was once extremely fertile, The Sahara was green and it goes on and on. The only thing is MAN had nothing to do with it. If the earth shifts one tenth of a degree on it’s axis, weather will be affected and science class taught us the the earth does wobble on it’s axis. Solar storms on the sun can cause heating on the earth and harsh weather patterns too. Another thing not mentioned by these same rectums is that if the Earth is wobbling it affects 2 other things. Ocean currents that heat and cool the coasts and the jet streams that can bring storms or calm.
    They also preach to us about pollution . Yes, smog was a problem in LA but it was aggravated by wind currents that would keep the same air in the bowl that is LA. We did have a problem with pollution and it is great that the air is cleaner. BUT, clean coal and improved burning systems make coal a great source of energy and nuclear plants can be made even cleaner and thorium is available too.. And though I’m not a fan of today’s cars, there has been some improvement in exhaust fumes. BUT….When Mt. St. Helens blew it’s top , it spewed out more pollutants than all the cars EVER produced and all the coal pollutants of the twentieth century up to the day of the eruption.
    The atmosphere of planet Earth Has not been completely clean since we got kicked out of the Garden of Eden and until Al Gore and all the other phony zombies quit flying around in private jets and riding in Cadillac SUV’s we will always have some pollution. We even get some when the wingnuts sit around the campfire, naked , singing Kumbaya they are polluting the atmosphere.
    Nature is a hell of a lot more responsible for climate change than man is and I wish the so called genius’ on the left would open their eyes and their little used brains to actually study the real problems. Like how to shut up Al Gore , Hillary Clinton and the worst air polluter of all, Barrack Hussein Ozero.

    • maxx

      If they opened their eyes it would cost them money because “global warming” aka “climate change” has been an enormous money pot for the people in power. In the state where I live we have quite a few ethanol plants since we produce a lot of corn. These plants were licensed even before the ethanol mandate was signed. Why? Because our state legislators had a heads up on the mandate from their federal politician buddies. So these legislators and their friends were given insider information. They subsequently became the owners of the ethanol plants. How’s that for political corruption? Going on all over the country every day. All politicians are crooks. Every damn one of them would do the same thing if offered the chance. You and I are put in jail for obtaining and using insider information like they got.

      • Trump rightly calls DC a swamp. But only an educated population can turn the tide. As long as people or Sheeple stay uninformed, the powers that be will always be the crooked powers that be. You are so correct in your thought on this and I bet lots of other things because you speak as one who cares.

  • Ron Lindsey

    This is the second revelation of the ‘hockey stick’ warming hoax! How many times has it been proved, certain government hacks keep pushing the so called warming trend!

  • maxx

    NOAA has been part of the climate conspiracy since Gore started the global warming scam. NOAA should be investigated along with many other supposed government agencies such as the FDA and EPA. Both of these agencies have been populated by former employees of large corporations that now use the agencies to assist their former employers such as big pharmaceutical and chemical companies and liberal colleges looking for funding and grants.

  • zorro1945

    Climate change, often sudden in the course of a generation, is normal for this earth. Based on records, there is strong evidence that we are in an interglacial hiatus. Some believe a condition similar to a Maunder Minimum could occur around 2030 due to sun spot activity. Anthropogenic warming is a reality, but I doubt to the extent alarmists contend. Their time would be better spent preparing us all for the changes in weather and climate that we know, from past records, will occur.

  • Cadfael

    Under pressure by whom? Who could pressure NOAA? Only one name comes to mind. Let’s have it Dr. Bates! Those who play Stud eventually either have to fold, or show what they’ve got! Show that Obama pressured NOAA and let’s bring him up on charges for having official government documents falsified at his orders! Obama finally indicted, no more pussy footing around the 500Lbs. presence in the room – now that would be news! Insinuations, hints, wink wink, you know, “they were given the order” (by whom); we’ve had enough of sensational headlines and getting doused by a lack of spine of those who could have had the perpetrator indicted but gave in to fear, or by courts calling “No standing” to protect their progressive benefactor.

  • Gerry Costa

    And this surprises — who ??????? Anyone with a half of brain knew that this is just a huge scam to make scum bags like gore,clintons,obamas,soros etc wealthier than they already are. They have bilked billions from naive middle class people.

  • TPS12

    Truth and trust seem to diminish more and more, It seems msm, scientist and politicians are becoming more agenda driven everyday. It’s puzzling how the left sees nothing strange that all these billionaires are pouring money into funding theses agendas.

  • MY POLAR BEAR WENT TO FLORIDA WEARING A HAWAIIAN SHIRT. GLOBAL WORMING ANOTHER COMMUNIST LIE. YOU WANT TO SEE GLOBAL WARMING WITH OBAMA’S NUKE MONEY? HOW DOES 30,000 DEGREES FEEL? THE URANIUMS AND NORTH KOREA HAVE A PLAN.

    LETS LEARN THE WORD THEY DON’T WANT HEARD. COMMUNIST.

    Subject: FLUSH THE CHANNELS

    WIMP WARNINGS DON’T SWEAT THE COMMUNIST PRESS. TRUMP WON THE SUPERBOWL. WE NEED 15 MORE SENATORS AND 50 MORE CONGRESSMEN. HAVE YOU NOTICED ALL THE C NETWORKS HAVE THE EXACT SAME TALKING POINTS. WHERE IS THE COMMUNIST HQ?

    AL QUEDA MERGES WITH MSNBC TO ATTACK TRUMP. I FLUSHED THE CHANNELS THIS MORNING AND CAUGHT MSNBC TOUTING A YEMENI TERRORIST WHO IS SAYING THE SEAL TEAM RAID WAS A FAILURE. HOW HARD UP ARE THE COMMUNISTS THAT THEY WOULD ENDORSE AL QUEDA TO STOP TRUMP THE EL CID OF THE USA?

    YET THEY COVERED UP OBAMA’S LOSSES IN AFGHANISTAN. YOU DON’T KNOW THAT 2,000 GI’S DIED AND WERE RE-CLASSIFIED AS NATO TROOPS TO BE IDENTIFIED LATER. 20,000 WOUNDED BY IRANIAN COPPER LUGS IN IED’S. ALL COVERED UP BY THE SAME STORY NEWS MEDIA.
    SPIRIT OF AMERICA PARTY.
    TRUMP WON THE SUPER BOWL AND THE STOCK MARKET IS GOING TO 21,000
    SIDE BAR TO FIX NEWS. FAIR AND IMPARTIAL DOES NOT CUT IT ANYMORE. HOWARD KURTZ BELONGS ON MSNBC WITH YOUR KELLY MISTAKE.

    WILL THE DEMOCRAT PARTY GO FULL COMMUNIST OR WILL THE 30% ALREADY COMMUNIST BE HELD IN CHECK?

    http://www.blogtalkradio.com/spiritofamericapartybook/2017/01/28/most-important-real-big-picture

  • Bruce Kellar

    The ruse must continue or a large part of the movement will lose standing. Distorting the facts has always been a political pleasure to be feasted on. Liberals have taken this practice and turned it into a skill that is now taught in public schools and colleges deserving of a degree. Liberals have no alternative but to lie and steal after their skillful losses. Insanity pervades the party of thieves.

  • MidnightDStroyer

    So it could honestly be said that the only “man-made” climate change that’s occurring is when they’re “cooking the books,” eh?
    O.o

    Far be it unkown to those very self-same “scientists” that this globe’s climate has been in a constant state of change ever since this hunk of rock even *became* a globe in orbit around the sun? Humanity has no such power over Nature, to cause climate change, slow it, stop it, or reverse it; anyone who wants your money by promising that humanity has that power are just after your money.

  • BH

    Hopefully this scrutiny of the data will include looking at the locations where temperatures are collected and make sure they all meet the proper standards. No locations in the middle of asphalt parking lot. No locations close to buildings that limit air flow. Etc. Don’t hold your breath though, too much money at stake for the libs.

    • JYuma

      If you think that. I have been showing that most of the Weather data gathering stations are not place according to Federal Rules for years. Just for the reasons that you have stated.
      There was a Survey about 10 years age that showed where 94% of ALL stations were not place correctly.

    • Snake

      This has already been done. What was found is that accurate readings were recorded, in locations far from “parking lots” and other stupid locations (most were from ocean buoys and other wilderness locations), but because those readings did not support the governments climate change computer models they changed the data to meet their needs. All of the actual readings were obtained through the FOIA and whistleblowers!
      The problem is that libturds refuse to accept the facts, you could tape it to a brick and hit them in the head with it and they still would not get it!

  • AL

    The reason liberal fear the warming is. ALL LIBERAL COMMUNIST BABY KILLERS ARE GOING TO JOIN THE demoKKKrat leader SATAN

  • Weather world

    Also wind energy

    John Miller
    wrote:

    Wind Energy is not a
    valuable source of electric ..and the way that the Companies get local towns to
    buy into it is wrong at every level. There are a few websites I would like for
    you to see and a movie called windfall http://windfallthemovie.com/index_1.html
    and that is there tactics towards people .all I want to do is try to create
    jobs for this hard economic area as many as possible ..With the current
    structure I have a slim chance but will continue to try .Here are is a
    website http://www.windtaskforce.org/ that
    has great information about the downside of wind and if you want to make an
    investment These guys at MIT are the wind Future mans name is Alan Rein http://entrepreneurship.mit.edu/article/altaeros-team-builds-its-first-prototype-airborne-wind-turbine
    they had there first launch in April of this year ………

    Besides the Creature From
    Jekyll Island movie …any more that you have I would like to learn more

    The godfather of global warming lowers the boom on climate change

    http://www.torontosun.com/2012/06/22/green-drivel

    Eighteen months ago, James Lovelock, the godfather of global warming, gave a
    startling interview to msnbc.com in which he acknowledged he had been unduly
    “alarmist” about climate change.

    The implications were extraordinary.

    Lovelock is a world-renowned scientist and environmentalist whose Gaia
    theory — that the Earth operates as a single, living organism — has had a
    profound impact on the development of global warming theory.

    Unlike many “environmentalists,” who have degrees in political science,
    Lovelock, until his recent retirement at age 92, was a much-honored working
    scientist and academic.

    His inventions have been used by NASA, among many other scientific
    organizations.

    Lovelock’s invention of the electron capture detector in 1957 first enabled
    scientists to measure CFCs (chlorofluorocarbons) and other pollutants in the
    atmosphere, leading, in many ways, to the birth of the modern environmental
    movement.

    Having observed that global temperatures since the turn of the millennium
    have not gone up in the way computer-based climate models predicted, Lovelock
    acknowledged, “the problem is we don’t know what the climate is doing. We
    thought we knew 20 years ago.” Now, Lovelock has given a follow-up interview to
    the UK’s
    Guardian newspaper in which he delivers more bombshells sure to anger the
    global green movement, which for years worshipped his Gaia theory and
    apocalyptic predictions that billions would die from man-made climate change by
    the end of this century.

    Lovelock still believes anthropogenic global warming is occurring and that
    mankind must lower its greenhouse gas emissions, but says it’s now clear the
    doomsday predictions, including his own (and Al Gore’s) were incorrect.

    He responds to attacks on his revised views by noting that, unlike many
    climate scientists who fear a loss of government funding if they admit error,
    as a freelance scientist, he’s never been afraid to revise his theories in the
    face of new evidence. Indeed, that’s how science advances.

    Among his observations to the Guardian:

    (1) A long-time supporter of nuclear power as a way to lower greenhouse gas
    emissions, which has made him unpopular with environmentalists, Lovelock has
    now come out in favour of natural gas fracking (which environmentalists also
    oppose), as a low-polluting alternative to coal.

    As Lovelock observes, “Gas is almost a give-away in the U.S.
    at the moment. They’ve gone for fracking in a big way. This is what makes me
    very cross with the greens for trying to knock it … Let’s be pragmatic and
    sensible and get Britain
    to switch everything to methane. We should be going mad on it.” (Kandeh
    Yumkella, co-head of a major United Nations program on sustainable energy, made
    similar arguments last week at a UN environmental conference in Rio
    de Janeiro, advocating the development of conventional
    and unconventional natural gas resources as a way to reduce deforestation and
    save millions of lives in the Third World.)

    (2) Lovelock blasted greens for treating global warming like a religion.

    “It just so happens that the green religion is now taking over from the
    Christian religion,” Lovelock observed. “I don’t think people have noticed
    that, but it’s got all the sort of terms that religions use … The greens use
    guilt. That just shows how religious greens are. You can’t win people round by
    saying they are guilty for putting (carbon dioxide) in the air.”

    (3) Lovelock mocks the idea modern economies can be powered by wind
    turbines.

    As he puts it, “so-called ‘sustainable development’ … is meaningless drivel
    … We rushed into renewable energy without any thought. The schemes are largely
    hopelessly inefficient and unpleasant. I personally can’t stand windmills at
    any price.”

    (4) Finally, about claims “the science is settled” on global warming: “One
    thing that being a scientist has taught me is that you can never be certain
    about anything. You never know the truth. You can only approach it and hope to
    get a bit nearer to it each time. You iterate towards the truth. You don’t know
    it.”

  • PHOENIX FIVE EARTH
    CHANGES BULLETIN

    November 3, 2016 MW Mandeville (Black Canyon City,
    Arizona)

    BULLETIN ITEM: A Major New Front Has Opened In The Second American
    Revolution

    U.S. Intelligence Agencies and FBI rank and file are in open rebellion against
    political controllers, NYPD has the goods on Hillary Crimes and her aide’s
    treason, Obama’s White House has lost control of the government. The Democrat
    Party is collapsing rapidly, U.S. Mass Media Is Reduced To Spreading Stinking
    Piles of Pig Twaddle, Trump’s landslide in the range of 70%, U.S.
    Political circles are in chaos. The end draws near for the NWO Cabal.

    Dr. Steve Pieczenik, a psychiatrist and NY Times Bestselling Author who
    has also held high US Government positions since the mid-1970s, including
    Deputy Assistant Secretary of State under Henry Kissinger, Cyrus Vance and
    James Baker, explains that a silent civil war has erupted in the deep
    bureaucratic portions of the U.S. between those mindlessly following diktat of
    the corrupt Cabal and those who have determined to up end it.

    ABOVE ALL, GET
    THIS: Atlas has just shrugged and said f*** it. Quite obviously, as
    an intelligence professional with decades of experience, Pieczenik has made the
    calculation that the U.S.
    government is in chaotic confusion after months of relentless hammering by
    Wikileaks, Info wars and several thousand fellow travelers. He obviously has
    concluded that the political class now lacks the ability to use security forces
    against him and other professionals within the government who are taking them
    head on. He expects that the forces of opposition to the Globalist Cabal
    and their allied crime families are strong enough to sustain the uprising of
    the professional against the corrupt politicos and push them over the cliff.

    I predict an avalanche of shrugging and a deepening of the crescendo of
    opposition. Soon, very soon, we will hear of a delegation from Congress
    meeting with Hillary to tell her “it’s over”.

    After the lying, traitorous actions of the politicians in Libya,
    Benghazi, and Syria,
    especially the actions of Obama and Clinton, the U.S.
    intelligence and military agencies have been leaking like a sieve. Their steady
    flood of revealing information through the internet has completely undermined
    the crime rings who control the political offices, destroyed Obama’s
    credibility, reduced the national mass media (whom I generally call the Warcast
    Media) to a laughing stock of ass clowns, and brought the defeat of Hillary
    Clinton in the Democratic Party primaries for the Presidential
    nomination.

    With the assistance of Obama’s Bolsheviks (who largely control his Whitehouse
    Administration) and with many of the allies they have created through the
    Clinton Foundation, the Clintons
    were able to stage a “coup” through the Democratic National Committee structure
    and egregiously “steal” the nomination from the candidate who had clearly won
    the majority vote, Bernie Sanders. With a variety of Cabal connections,
    especially the George Soros organizations (spider webs of international
    corruption), the Bush Crime Family, and the tightly controlled Mass
    Media, the Clintons have set
    in motion a major effort to “steal” votes in order to win the Presidency.
    This has become an imperative of the campaign since it has been apparent since
    early September that the Clintons
    were unable to generate popular support for Hillary’s candidacy and that Trump
    was generating a landslide.

    Accordingly, the Mass Media began an aggressive campaign of predictive
    programming and election coverage so slanted against Trump that all historical
    norms of civility and respectability has been trashed in the U.S. Recent
    weeks have seen the old-line national media organizations push one faux poll
    result after another on a not-so-unsuspecting public, using statistical
    “fractioning” to adjust poll results to show Hillary winning nationally by
    various amounts. This effort has been so unprofessional and essentially
    fraudulent, it is difficult to imagine how the publishers expect to regain any
    respectability after the elections. The stench from their piles will
    linger a long time.

    The predictive programming of the election is the last hope for a
    Neocon-Clinton-Bolshevik win. By using constant media repetition to
    create a faux reality that Clinton
    is winning, they hope to keep a large number of voters “captured” in a complete
    delusion. Because the voters believe it, they will act as if it were true
    and vote for their “winner”, or not vote at all if they don’t like her.
    If this strategy works to retain the U.S. Presidency in Cabal hands, even
    despite the fact that Clinton’s
    actual vote count is likely to be small in many states, and smaller still in
    many other states, this likely would be the last real election in the U.S.
    Any successors are likely to be Orwellian exercises, and Orwellian social
    engineers eventually are likely to end up in control of all elections to seal
    the Tyranny into an impregnable fortress which cannot be cast off.

    In order to ward off the growing movement to indict the Clintons
    for their corruptions and malfeasance in office, a second “coup” was conducted
    against security and intelligence forces to neutralize anyone proposing
    prosecution of Clinton.
    Against this juggernaut, factions in the deep U.S.
    bureaucracies have conducted a counter-coup. This soft coup (conducted by
    organization, not guns) now even has a public presence since Steve Pieczenik
    has stepped forth in a bold way to announce it. It has not been announced
    in the U.S. Warcast Media, of course, but it will reach into the
    headlines of media around the world. In a video announcement made on November 1, 2016 through Infowars and
    other Iway news channels, Pieczenik begins by explaining what is happening with
    Wikileaks. He claims that a group of US
    intelligence agents from over 15 organizations supplied WikiLeaks in recent
    weeks with all of the emails which have flooded the Clinton
    campaign and discredited many of its members. And they are not
    finished. At any moment another tranche of ever yet more incriminating
    documents will flood into the public realm. Assange has already announced
    a release is imminent and it will lead to jail time for the Clintons.

    Following is a transcript of Pieczenik’s video announcement. Read it
    carefully.

    “On November 1, 2016,
    Hillary and Bill Clinton and their entourage of assistants effected a civilian
    coup. In contrast to the usual concept of a coup, where the military’s involved
    and takes over the White House and communication centers, very much like the
    scenarios you see in a movie, this coup was done silently and very effectively
    through two methods: corruption and co-optation. The Clintons
    have been involved in co-opting our White House, our Judiciary, our CIA,
    our Federal Bureau of Investigation, our Attorney General, Loretta Lynch and
    our Director of the FBI, James Comey for some time now. What they’ve done is to
    make sure that they were part and parcel of a group of people who were
    interrelated through political cronyism.” (Ed. Note: in other
    words, they have compromised so many people that they are forced to continue to
    play along less all of them go to jail).

    Pieczenik continues: “However, in order to stop this coup, we in the
    intelligence community and others involved have informally gotten together and
    with their permission, I am beginning to announce that we’ve initiated a
    counter-coup through Julian Assange and WikiLeaks. “What has happened, in
    effect, when Comey had to open up the case of Hillary Clinton and discuss the
    emails that were involved with the Anthony Weiner case, it was not the case,
    itself that was as important as the fact that this was the entrée for many of
    us in the counter-coup to say to the Administration: We have your number.

    “Not only do we have your number, we’re going to stop you from making Hillary the
    President of the United States – and at the same time, we will convict and
    indict the President of the United States, Loretta Lynch and many others who
    are involved in the cover-up of the massive corruption that occurred under the
    Clinton Foundation.

    “Now, in both cases, their coup was silent and our counter-coup was silent and
    it was all transpired or occurred on the internet and this is probably the
    first time in the history of any country where a coup was initiated through the
    internet and a counter-coup was initiated through the Internet.

    “I am just a small part of something far bigger than myself. It was the
    brave men and women who are in the FBI, the CIA
    the Director of Intelligence, the military intelligence and men and women in 15
    other intelligence organizations who are sick and tired of seeing this
    corruption in the White House and the Justice Department and the intelligence
    system and we decided that there was something we had to do in order to save
    the Republic.

    “So we initiated a counter-coup through Julian Assange, who has been very
    brave and really quite formidable, in his ability to come forth and provide all
    the necessary emails that we gave to him in order to undermine Hillary and Bill
    Clinton. Again, America
    we’re going through a major, major transition and quite frankly – a Second
    American Revolution. We do not have guns, we do not have weapons, we do not
    intend to kill anybody, we do not intend to harm anybody but we, the American
    public and those of us who serve as veterans and in intelligence service, like
    myself will stop the Clintons from
    assuming power that they don’t deserve.

    “At the same time, we will make certain that Obama leaves, without any
    trail of a pardon or any other act of treason. In effect, we want a peaceful transition
    in this great American Republic.
    I bring you this news and I want you to understand what has happened. A moment
    of history is occurring right now in front of us and I’m proud to explain it to
    you.”

    Video: (4 mins) Breaking: Dr. Steve Pieczenik – A Second American
    Revolutionhttp://forbiddenknowledgetv.net/breaking-dr-steve-pieczenik-a-second-american-revolution/

    In his discussion with Alex Jones, Pieczenik aggressively went
    further. He said their strategy is simple and direct. If Clinton
    does not voluntarily withdraw from politics during the next few weeks, she will
    be indicted in a variety of ways she and her fixers cannot contain. It will
    commence with a massive press conference conducted by the intelligence and
    security agencies of the U.S.
    where she will be accused by high ranking professionals of racketeering crimes
    and a variety of other charges. In the mean time, Pieczenik indicates
    that all of her aides, cronies, and employees are being directly warned
    in a variety of ways about the evidence which can be used to indict the Clinton
    associates of collusion in the Clinton
    crimes. They are telling her associates to cease and desist by removing
    their support of Clinton. One by
    one they will be tackled and pinned to the wall of Iway indictments.
    Pieczenik claims their chief objective is to shepherd a peaceful and speedy
    transition of power to Trump and they would just as soon see the Clintons
    voluntarily disappear forever.

    What may have particularly united the intelligence professionals to finally act
    is what was found on the smutty computer used by Anthony Weiner’s wife,
    Abedin. Most upsetting was the finding of the keys to “Special Access
    Programs”. These are “dark programs” which are above top secret
    classification and generally not even top politicians ever see the inside of
    these programs. The computer also contains details of Anthony Weiner’s
    trolling for pubescent teens and Bill Clinton’s visits to Epstein’s Pedophile
    Parties. Abedin apparently “saved” these files as an “insurance backup”
    for blackmail. But the saving of purloined copies of “Special
    Access Programs”, which only Clinton
    could have gotten through Obama, constitutes a profound national security
    breach.

    Doubtless an intense international investigation is underway to trace what has
    happened with those files. The lights are probably on all night in the NSA’s
    archive of “total information awareness” in Utah.

    If damming details can be found in that huge mega-memory which stops the
    Globalist Coup, the project will have been worthwhile. And that would be
    profoundly ironic. The spy project to enable Global Tyranny may end up
    destroying it.

    Best Wishes, Michael Wells Mandeville,

    The Hills of Arizona USA at mwman@q.com

  • Phoenix Five Earth Changes Bulletin

    2014, by Michael Wells Mandeville

    Bulletin Item: Climate Change (Global Governance Takeover) talks in Paris
    starting a day early. (Nov 29) 2015

    http://phys.org/news/2015-11-paris-climate-conference-day-early.html

    I have decided to sit with this to summarize the machinations and the
    fundamental critiques to produce a serious document which will hold throughout
    the next few years on the topic.

    The reason is very simple. Quite a few perspectives have finally
    brought together enough data and empirical observations to be very clear about
    the fundamentals.

    Global Warming is not happening

    All the claims and charts and reports about such are contrived exercises of
    extreme quackademery.

    There is no significant “climate change” in the sense of a
    transformation of natural processes.

    There are natural solar driven processes which are clearly “cycling”
    the planet into a “cool phase”

    The concept of “extreme weather” now being reported widely has been
    induced by the same jackasses pushing global warming as a concept. We are more
    aware of extreme events because of increased reporting and weather analysis and
    an induced hyper-sensitivity to the issue. Somewhere a local record is
    ALWAYS being broken. ALWAYS.

    Tornadoes and Hurricanes are actually at lower levels overall than in previous
    decades.

    Physicists (real ones) prove that co2 levels cannot alter the average heat of
    the earth. The idea that CO2 levels of any kind are causing climate
    changes of any kind is mathematically impossible. The claim is nothing
    more than a phony scam for manipulating gullible people.

    The fundamental long term perspective which is easily proven is that the Earth
    is in a major “cool phase” compared to the millenniums and geological
    ages of the past. There was a recent warming up (slight) during the
    last half of the 20th century along with an increase in average solar activity
    which spanned most of the same decades.

    The Sun is now less activity and appears or “looks” like it may get
    less active like previous “cool periods” during the past 1000 years.

    Mirroring this decline, almost all glaciation is increasing on all
    continents. Polar ice at both ends is increasing. Greenland
    is colder, Canadian Arctic is colder, Antarctica is at
    record levels of growth.

    2+2=4, it really does, draw the obvious conclusion.

    So called sea level increase is decreasing. (BTW this measurements avoid the
    phenomenon of coastal uplift and coastal submergence in the great subduction
    zones, which is a ceaseless change – measuring a change in sea level at a place
    probably indicates little more than the rate of uplift or downwarp OF THE LAND
    at that particular spot).

    In any event, the hysterical claims still being pushed by the Alarmists about a
    major rise in sea level is nothing but a hobgoblin to freak the
    “kids”. There simply is not enough available ice to melt to
    create ANY average rise in sea level beyond a few centimeters. It would
    take a temperature change of 100 degrees on the South Pole to melt enough ice
    to change coastlines. It isn’t going to happen by CO2. If if does
    so because of a huge change in solar output, melting ice would BE THE LEAST OF
    OUR PROBLEMS.

    Everything has been debunked. EVERYTHING HAS
    BEEN DEBUNKED. EVERYTHING HAS BEEN DEBUNKED.

    THE ISSUE OF CLIMATE CHANGE, AS PREDICTED DECADES AGO, IS NOTHING BUT
    POLITICAL THEATRE TO GRAB POWER FOR FREAKS WHO WANT TO IMPOSE DIKTAT OVER
    EVERY ASPECT OF YOUR LIFE. At the core of it are Bolsheviks who want to remake
    you in their image, and their image is not pretty, and their sponsors, the
    hereditary aristocracies whose cabals are busily re-creating neo-feudal estates
    for themselves to control all resources on Earth.

    So actually the news is quite uplifting. They haven’t a leg to stand
    on. They are a sick, sorry, and fairly stupid crew. They can and
    will be easily driven off the state of history. We will see some of that this
    next two weeks. There are major contentions and splits going on in the
    political elites, they will not be able to seal the deal the Bolsheviks want.

    Just call the BS on all that they do and say. Every opportunity.
    Somebody mentions global warming? Look strangely at them and simply say,
    “Dude”, it is simply not happening, It’s all a big fat
    lie…haven’t you noticed that winters are colder than the past?”.
    That’s the universal message, the universal meme which unlocks the scam and
    frees people from the hypnosis of the mass media.

    Enjoy Thanksgiving. Give thanks especially that we can now decisively
    free ourselves from this hobgoblin. Later today or tomorrow
    I will send a compilation of U tube videos by experts who will march you
    through all the graphs and charts which document every aspect of what I have
    just said above.

  • flashy0ne

    This PHONY climate data goes back many years — yes, even before good ole ‘the sky is falling’ Gore jumped aboard to help support a failing political career. Back as far as 1990, Dixy Lee Ray discussed quite a few environmental disasters which were more science fiction than fact. Unfortunately, the big practitioners of terror seem to be the very persons funded to “save us from ourselves”. Everyone wants clean water and air — buts let’s be reasonable. We don’t need biased studies, phony computer models and doctored/altered data to get preconceived answers. All you have to do is look up — that big light bulb in the sky has more effect on our weather than all of the hot air generated by the dooms day sayers!

  • http://seekingalpha.com/article/4016882-baker-hughes-ge-potential-mega-deal-oil-service-space?ifp=0

    2016 October 31

    from G. Edward
    Griffin

    Native Americans

    pawns in the
    global-warming game

    New speaker confirmed for myth-breaking event.

    Elaine Willman has been added to the lineup of
    speakers at
    the upcoming 3rd
    Congress of Freedom Force International. It will be a gathering of
    world experts who will shatter the myth of global-warming.

    Elaine will show how native Americans are being used as pawns on the chessboard
    of environmentalism to break the United States into regions structured
    around lands originally occupied by different native-American tribes.
    Eventually, these regions are to be recognized by the UN as sovereign states
    and are to replace the present structure of a single nation called America.

    What has this to do
    with global warming?

    The answer is that the building of global government today is promoted as an
    environmental necessity, and that argument rests almost entirely on
    the myth of global warming. Elaine will show that the dismantling of America is an important part of this
    mindset.

    Elaine Willman is co-author of Going to
    Pieces; The Dismantling of the United States, a report on how the US government is funding the rise of
    tribalism in a strategy to reorganize local political subdivisions into
    regional governments eventually to be recognized by the UN as sovereign states.

    Elaine is of Cherokee lineage and has worked most of her adult life with tribal
    leaders to protect the rights of native-Americans. Now she is equally active in
    protecting the rights of non-tribal citizens from tribal-government overreach
    and loss of American sovereignty.

    The 3rd Congress of
    Freedom Force International will be convened in Phoenix, Arizona, on December 2,
    3 & 4, 2016.

    It will be a gathering of world experts who will shatter the myth of
    global-warming.

    You are invited.

    Here are the experts
    who will participate.

    Biographical information is
    on the web site.

    Elaine
    Willman

    Native Americans

    Pawns in the Agenda-21 Game

    Lord
    Monckton

    Global Warming
    Is A Monstrous Hoax

    Prof.
    Tim Ball

    Global Warming
    Is

    the Biggest Deception in History

    Patrick
    Wood

    Technocracy;

    Tyranny Pretending To Be Science

    Jim
    Lee

    Weather
    Modification for War and Profit

    Debbie
    Bacigalupi

    Smart
    Growth;

    The Depopulation of Rural America

    Prof.
    William Happer

    The Real
    Inconvenient Truth;

    CO2 Does Not Cause Global Warming

    G.
    Edward Griffin

    Why Do They
    Deceive?

    Dan
    Happel

    Global-Warming
    Hysteria

    and Agenda-21

    Alex
    Newman

    Selling the
    Myth;

    Schools and Media Lead the Way

    Michael
    Shaw

    Don’t Worry
    about the Future.

    Agenda-21 Is Already Here

    Register now.

    Early-Bird rates end on November 3

    Click
    here for details.

  • JYuma

    It sure is Great to find a Site that the people in it are not Sheep. That have a I.Q. higher that 70.

  • randy jackson

    NOAA = bull$h!t artists exposed for all to see that they are phoney boloney
    BS artists exposed
    Any reply from NOAA?

  • 1baronrichsnot1

    As we see, corruption and misinformation is the every day event in our gov’t, democrats want an emergency type reaction because it is a tax theft operation! It is a slush fund for politics! There is no way we can control the sun or the earths obit! Only lies and deceit including meddling and dishonesty is used for “proof” that man made global warming exist!! The earth has warmed, from the ice age(caused by either astroids or volcanos) blocked the sun long enough for the ice age, and suspected sun cycles aiding the cool down, as the atmosphere cleaned its self, the earth warmed, thank god i live in a time of plenty, plenty of food, a return of growing season tempatures, and more of the earth is useful! Now if we could just get the message across to the corrupted idiots, who use politics, and fear to rape the people of their earnings! I see nothing being done with the money captured from workers to combat global warming, except scams of solar power, imposed by the late great B.O.

  • John Williams

    There is no question we are experiencing “climate change” it has happened for millions of years and it will continue to happen, the issue at hand is whether it is man caused. Since the climate has been changing millions of years before man or any kind of “industrial revolution,” common sense would tell you man has caused only some “possible” minuscule amount, if that, the climate goes thru a process of never ending cycles. Those promoting this are doing so at the behest of corrupt leaders and the self proclaimed elite who stand to gain total control of the masses and get filthy stinking rich or richer whichever the case. Climate change has never been about the climate and always about the control of the masses. Imagine the dictators, despots and elite of the world are all drooling on themselves at the prospect of a “SINGLE ISSUE” that can conceivably be used to CONTROL EVERY ASPECT of the life of every person on earth, an excuse if you will, to do anything they want and explain it all away by making it for your own good. If there is a better excuse, I don’t know what it is.

  • Joe Toy

    Global Warming, Climate change? Just more tools for the leftists Dems to make more rules to control the good guys. Them good guys be us, Kemo Sabe.

  • studi30

    GLOBULL WARMING.

  • kassa1

    The people need to start working out to flush your system or more of these communist a.k.a. Democrats as there are bound to determine to take this country down. They do not fear any words but what’s going to come to blows eventually there will be blood spilled and it’s all because of them and their allies in the media! We have scumbag lawyers in this country we have scumbag Marxist judges we have many and congress ( both parties and ALL of the democrats) that are scum bag Marxist! The right is going to have Start standing up for theirself or their children will have no future! We have people in the military the swore to protect us from domestic enemies, the bar which donates have a lead to the communist a.k.a. Democrat party, is one operation needs to be addressed severely even if their families have to be addressed as they care nothing about our families by trying to go and make our borders open to people who want to kill us just so they can advance their political agenda for the destruction of the middle class in this country and our culture and religion. Abraham Lincoln says that this country has brought down it’ll be brought down from within and it’s our whole system of justice that’s the problem, we have a man that wants to help straighten this out and if we don’t back him it’s done people it’s done ,so gross and Cahone us or sit back and let your country go down the drain

  • MIKE6080

    no funds to them , how about prison sentences for them , al gore made over 100 million because of the carbon scam

  • robert sanders

    OH NO, I CANT BELIEVE THEY LIED TO US . THE WORLD IS COMING TO AN END. RUN EVERYBODY RUN. HEHEHEHE GIVE ME A F#####G BRAKE.

    • William McClure

      Yep, “climate change” is the atheist’s endtime hysteria.

  • Jon’s On

    They have been lying about this for years. Before global warming it was global cooling. Whatever, they just need something to give them an excuse to take your money and have control. As usual for the democrats it’s based on a lie.

  • dahniuru

    Start looking for information about Global Weather patters in the ice core research now coming out of Antarctica. The data covers the last 800,000 years, and includes information about temperature and CO2 concentrations on a yearly basis. I won’t tell you what it says, you look for yourself.

    • JYuma

      Please give us a Link!

  • Walter Flatt

    PRAY THAT THIS DOES NOT HAPPEN, BUT GET READY, PRESIDENT TRUMP, BE VERY CAREFUL, WE HAVE WORKED TO HARD TO LOSE YOU NOW. FIRE EVERYONE ASSOCIATED WITH OBAMA.

    FROM A KOREAN WAR VET 51/53, A REG. DEM. ALL MY LIFE, BUT I VOTED FOR TRUMP & WILL NEVER VOTE DEM AGAIN AS LONG AS THIS LYING CROOKED MESS IS IN D.C.

    HAS OBAMA SET HIMSELF UP TO BE THE HEAD OF A MUSLIM TRY AT TAKING THIS COUNTRY? BETTER THINK! HE IS A MUSLIM, 5 MUSLIM CAMPS JUST ACROSS THE LINE IN NORTH VA. MUSLIM AND FEMA CAMPS ALL OVER THE USA, MOST CLOSE TO MILITARY BASES. HE HAS TAKEN BILLIONS OF YOUR MONEY AND GIVEN TO MUSLIMS AND HAS DONE NOTHING BUT DAMAGE THE USA. BETTER WAKE UP.

    OBAMA HAS GIVEN BILLIONS OF OUR TAX MONEY TO RADICAL MUSLIMS TRYING TO KILL US.

    I BELIEVE WE HAVE BEEN SET UP FOR A TRY AT A MUSLIM INVASION OF THIS COUNTRY BY, HILLIARY, OBAMA, KERRY, SORROS AND THE BIASED MEDIA. READ ALL THE WHYS BELOW.

    WHY ISN’T A LAW BEING ENFORCED BARRING ALL MUSLIMS FROM THIS COUNTRY. THIS LAW WAS PASSED IN 1952. PUBLIC LAW 414, PAGE 2, SECTION 212. ALSO #8 US CODE 482, BARRING ALL INADISSIBLE ALIENS FROM THE USA GOVERNMENT WAS PASSED IN 1952.

    WHY DO YOU THINK ANYTHING OBAMA HAS DONE IS LEGAL, HE HAS CONFESSED TO BEING A MUSLIM ON NATION WIDE TV. EVERYTHING HE HAS SIGNED, OR ORDERED IN 8 YEARS IS ILLEGAL.

    WHY DID HILLIARY HAVE A MUSLIM FROM A RADICAL FAMILY AS HER TOP AIDE FOR 10 YEARS, HUMA COULD BE A PERFECT PIPELINE TO PASS SECRETS TO THE MUSLIM WORLD.

    WHY HAS OBAMA SURROUNDED HIMSELF WITH MUSLIMS ANOTHER PERFECT PIPELINE TO PASS SECRETS. HE HAS DECLARED HIMSELF A MUSLIM ON NATIONWIDE TV.

    WHY DOES THE BIASED NEWS MEDIA SAY HE IS NOT A MUSLIM, WHEN I HAVE A LIST OF WHERE 34 TIMES HE HAS EITHER HELPED THEM OR SAID HE WAS ONE.

    WHY GET MAD AT PUTIN, HE SAID THAT THERE WAS NO PLACE IN RUSSIA FOR ANYONE THAT WOULD NOT FOLLOW THEIR LAW AND SPEAK THEIR LANGUAGE, THEY WOULD HAVE TO GO TO A COUNTRY THAT DID.

    WHY HAS HILLIARY, OBAMA, KERRY AND THE BIASED NEWS MEDIA DONE EVERYTHING THEY CAN TO HELP THE RADICAL MUSLIMS.

    WHY DID THE OBAMA ADMINSTRATION TRY AND BUY UP ALL AMMO?

    WHY TRADE 5 TERRIOST FROM CUBA FOR ONE TRAITOR?

    WHY TRY AND TAKE OUR GUNS? HITLER DID, & HISTORY TELLS US WHAT HAPPENED THERE.

    WHY ALLOW A MINIMUM OF 37 MUSLIM CAMPS HERE IN THE STATES? MOST CLOSE TO MILITARY BASES. I PERSONALLY VERIFIED THE ONES IN SHAWNEE NATIONAL PARK, IN IL. AND THE ONE AT DOVER, TN. AND THE FEMA CAMP IN EAST KY.

    WHY ARE THERE 5 MUSLIM CAMPS IN N. VIRGINIA, CLOSE TO DC? ARE THEY TO TAKE WASHINGTON?

    WHY BUILD A FEMA CAMP IN EVERY STATE, SOME MORE THAN ONE, AT TAX PAYERS EXPENSE, WITH ARMED GUARDS? ARE THEY TO HOLD AND TRAIN MUSLIMS?

    WHY ARE THEY BRINGING THOUSANDS OF YOUNG MUSLIMS HERE?

    WHY IS THE TAX PAYER HAVING TO FEED, CLOTH & HOUSE THE HUNDREDS OF THOUSAND OF MUSLIMS BEING BROUGHT HERE?

    WHY GIVE THE THOUSANDS OF MUSLIMS BROUGHT IN FREE HEALTH CARE, SPENDING THOUSANDS FOR HOSPITAL CARE?

    WHY ARE THE ILLEGALS BEING TREATED BETTER THAN OUR VETERANS.

    WHY STOP THE TANK AND PLANE SHIPPMENT TO EGYPT, WHEN THEIR ARMY KICKED THE RADICALS OUT?

    WHY DID OUR GOVERNMENT SEND BILLIONS OF DOLLARS TO HELP THE RADICALS IN IRAN, A COUNTRY OUT TO DESTROY US?

    WHY ARE WE SENDING BILLIONS TO ARAB COUNTRIES, AND LETING OUR COUNTRY GO TO POT?

    WHY DONT THEY ENFORCE THE LAW BARRING ALL MUSLIMS FROM THIS COUNTRY? PRAY THAT TRUMP WILL DO THIS.

    WHY IS THE MUSLIM MAJOR IN TEXAS LIVING THAT KILLED 14 SOLDIERS AND WOUNDED A LOT MORE?

    WHY ARE THEY RELEASING ALL MUSLIMS IN CUBA TO GO BACK INTO ACTION TO KILL OUR SOLDIERS?

    WHY DONT WE HANG ALL MUSLIMS CAUGHT AND BURY THEM WITH PIG PARTS, LIKE GENERAL PERSHING DID IN THE PHILLIPENS? HE STOPPED A MUSLIM UPRISING BY DOING JUST THAT.

    WHY WAS OBAMA ALLOWED TO SWEAR IN CARLOYN WALKER AS JUDGE IN BROOKLIN USING THE QURAN?

    WHY ALLOW ILLEGALS TO FLOOD OUR COUNTRY WHEN THEY COST MORE PER YEAR THAN THE IRAQ WAR.

    WHY SEND BILLIONS TO MUSLIM COUNTRIES TRYING TO KILL US.

    WHY DONT THE BIASED MEDIA REPORT ALL THIS.

    YOU SAY THAT A MUSLIM TRY AT A TAKEOVER IS IMPOSSIBLE, I CAN TAKE 100 WELL ARMED PEOPLE AND TAKE ANY BASE IN 1 HOUR, OUR TROOPS ARE NOT ARMED.

    BETTER COAT ALL YOU AMMO WITH PIGS BLOOD OR GREASE, LET THE WORLD KNOW YOU ARE DOING SO.

    TRUMP IS NOW THE PRESIDENT, SO, GET ON BOARD AND HELP HIM STRAIGHTEN THIS MESS OUT. PRAY FOR HIS PROTECTION EACH DAY.

    I HAVE A LOT MORE FACTS IF ANYONE WANTS THEM. SHARE THIS.

    • JYuma

      This I agree with 100%.
      Did I hear that the State department people left over from o’bozo, got the Boot.
      When The Exxon man entered his office.
      What was IT? 85%.was told to Hit the Road Jack?
      I may be wrong. Have been a time or two, in the last 73 years.

  • Joanne Jasny

    Americans need to come to terms with the fact that they are NOT the only people who count. There is a world beyond their coastlines that is filled with people, animals and flora that want to survive. America and China are the biggest polluters of the atmosphere and contrary to their egocentric machinations the quantity of CO2 and Methane going into the atmosphere IS due to human activity and IS rapidly changing the eco systems of the world. Too many Americans are totally ignorant of what is going on in the rest of the world, never mind what is going on in the next county or state.

    • JYuma

      Where OH where do I start?
      America, Has never thought that it is the only country that counts on this Planet.
      Were we to think that, there would be Millions dead, or starving around the World.
      If we thought that we would not be one of the First Country’s to send Help, Food , clothing, shelter around the World when a emergency happens.

      America, IS far from the Biggest Polluter, of this Planet.
      Cina, Lindia, Russia, South East Asia are.

      Methane, other pollutants are also made by Nature, at a Greater rate and amount than by man.

      If you do not care for America, Why are you here? Spouting you Illiterate Evriro. Bull Shit!
      If America is Soooo Bad? Why are people Dying to come here?

    • Candyman

      If anyone is unaware of the consequences of their actions, it is you. By denying third world countries the cheap, plentiful energy they could use to save lives, improve sanitation, grow their economy and jobs, increase quality and spans of life, you condemn millions to a hard life and an early death. But that’s OK, you hope to save many in the future, so to hell with the ones here now. All of your climate agreements do not hold China to any reduction, just the U.S. Even your own modelers say that if we deprive third word countries of the life giving energy that they need, and the U.S. spends trillions of dollars, and destroys the coal and oil industries ( putting 10’s of thousands out of work, and hiking the cost of everything we consume) we will drop the mean temperature less than 1/2 of 1 degree by the year 2100. This climate hoax is about money and power (control of the masses). It never was about the climate. Google “Agenda 21”. It’s a U.N. plan that was hatched at the Rio climate summit. Take off the blinders and learn what your leaders have in store for you and me (not for them of course, they are the masters).

  • AmericanBelle

    Look to ALL of the left’s agenda, social engineering experimentation, and fake news to find numerous examples of lies, deceit, misinformation, and outright BS to steal our wealth and redistribute it worldwide. Al Gore became an extremely wealthy man because of the weather hoax, and Leonardi DiCaprio is just as deceptive. Democrats believe the weather is far more serious than terrorism, and should be our No. 1 priority!! The left can’t be trusted…they lie like nothing we’ve ever seen before. I have no doubt that once all of the cabinet nominees are confirmed and in place, the world is going to change directions on its axis! The left’s destruction of American culture, traditions and values have turned the world upside down, and we all on the bottom looking up!

  • gene613

    W`hen the re`cords and emails from the University of East Anglia revealed that it had intentionally left out contrary data,eliminated the higher,warmer temperature from 950 to 1350 in the Middle Ages-the only man made machinery residue?a line in the mud from the wheel.Further,the “profesdors”bemoaned the fact that their real motive,i.e.redistribution of world wide wealth,would now be hindered by eliminating the phony need for energy credits,or charges for CO2 production.They also forgot to mention 1.that the smallest volcanic eruption emits more CO2 than ALL the provable CO2 produced by man in a decade,2.CO2 production actually stimulates photosynthesis,whereby plants produce free oxygen from CO2-this,also explaining the spontaneous renewal of forest growth despite the attempt to change forest to farm.In Brazil, the plan failed leaving access to Brazilia,the man made capital built in the hinterlands with few navigable roads,requiring increased air flights,ergo,more CO2 being produced.

  • A POLAR BEAR MOVED NEXT STORE TO ME IN NJ. HE SAID ALASKA IS TOO COLD. GLOBAL WORMING IS A DISEASE OF THE COMMUNIST MIND. I HAVE A PICTURE OF POLAR BEAR.STANDING ON ONE FOOT. THE CAPTION SAYS OUCH THIS ICE IS HOT.
    https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/fd53c615309528190c223a2519ae7c40daee7d4d302e34f4ba72d0231b7d20c2.jpg

    • JYuma

      You know about the Ice worms, too I C.

  • OnTheRoad

    QUOTE: (“Scientist Says Climate Agency Lied About Rate of Warning”)……it’s
    about time! The USA is the cleanest since the industrial age. What else
    do libs want us to do?! Go tell China to clean up their act……NOT us!

    • BH

      Obama already gave them a free pass until 2030 while at the same time setting the US levels at 2005.

  • mickeymike2

    Surprise Surprise. We’ve had periods of ice ages and periods of heat to melt the ice long before man inhabited earth. Hmm . . . wonder what could have caused that? Maybe the output from the Sun. You know like when we have summer and winter based on the orbit of the earth and what hemisphere is most aligned with the sun’s rays.

  • dahniuru

    Some of you people might read some of the research data coming out of the Antarctica Ice Core research. It provides 800,000 years of data about the atmosphere, including temp and CO2 concentrations and their increases and decreases. Interesting!

  • Gary Von Neida

    It is an International TAX SCHEME and the agenda allows for presenting lies as facts as it moves the agenda towards the GOAL, One World Government with a “police state” for all.
    It never has been about ecology , only CONTROL.

  • AL

    The demoKKKrats have every right to fear the warming. For it will be HOT as HELL where they are going. You cannot KILL OVER 61,000,000 babies and think it is alright.

  • kassa1

    Global warming why was all about taking more of your money and putting more controls on you either really late and that’s all it’s about, as they do not practice what they preach it. It’s an attack on freedom blatantly

  • Spunky

    Lied to line the pockets of the elite – The Lefts sneaky tactics exposed again. This big climate lie will be paid for by generations down the road – just to feed the greed of folks today – sad that some humans are really monsters. Need to shut off the tap of funds to this ASAP.