On-Duty Cop Convicted In Child Assault

Empty courtroom with wooden furnishings and judges bench.

A former Indiana police officer has been convicted of sexually assaulting a 14-year-old runaway while on duty, a case that strikes at the core of public trust and law enforcement accountability.

Quick Take

A federal jury in Indianapolis convicted former Kokomo Police Department officer Sinmi Asomuyide after a five-day trial.^[1]^[3]
Jurors found that he willfully deprived the victim of her constitutional rights by sexually assaulting her.^[1]
The verdict also included findings tied to kidnapping, abusive sexual contact of a child under 16, lying to investigators, and deleting a messaging application used to contact the minor.^[1]
The public record provided here is strong on the verdict but limited on the underlying trial evidence and defense response.^[1]^[3]

Federal Jury Delivers Conviction

The Justice Department said a federal jury in the Southern District of Indiana convicted Sinmi Asomuyide, 33, of charges tied to the on-duty sexual assault of a 14-year-old and related obstruction.^[1] Local reporting matched that account, describing the case as a conviction after a five-day trial in Indianapolis.^[3] The verdict matters because it was not a vague misconduct finding; jurors concluded that a sworn officer abused his authority in a case involving a minor.^[1]

According to the Justice Department, jurors found that Asomuyide willfully deprived the victim of her constitutional rights by sexually assaulting her.^[1] The same release says the jury also found that his conduct included kidnapping and abusive sexual contact of a child under 16.^[1] For readers who care about law, order, and the rule of law, the basic issue is simple: the badge is supposed to protect vulnerable people, not become a tool for predation.

Concealment Findings Deepen the Case

The verdict did not stop at the assault allegation. Prosecutors said jurors also found that Asomuyide lied to the Indiana State Police by denying sexual contact with the victim and by falsely describing corroborating evidence.^[1] The Justice Department further said the jury found he deleted a messaging application he had used to communicate with the minor before the assault in an effort to cover it up.^[1] Those findings suggest the case involved not only abuse, but also a deliberate attempt to hide it.

That concealment detail will resonate with readers who have watched institutions fail upward for too long. When an officer is accused of using a government-issued position to isolate a child and then erase the trail, the problem is bigger than one criminal act.^[1] It becomes a warning about how much damage can be done when public trust, state power, and weak accountability collide. The public deserves a full accounting, not a sanitized headline.

What the Current Record Shows — and What It Does Not

The material provided here is enough to confirm the conviction, but it does not include the indictment, verdict form, transcript, or evidence exhibits from trial.^[1]^[3] That means the exact wording of each count, the full evidentiary chain, and the defense’s detailed response are not visible in the record supplied for this article.^[1]^[3] The Justice Department release is authoritative as the government’s account of the verdict, but it is still a prosecution summary, not the complete court file.^[1]

Full story from DOJ & court records:

Sinmi Asomuyide, 33, former Kokomo, IN police officer, was convicted June 5, 2026 by federal jury after 5-day trial.

Guilty of depriving a 14-year-old runaway of her constitutional rights by sexually assaulting her while on duty (incl.…

— Grok (@grok) June 8, 2026

Even with those limits, the main takeaway is hard to miss: a former police officer was convicted by a federal jury for sexually assaulting a 14-year-old while on duty, then trying to conceal what happened.^[1]^[3] In an era when families are already dealing with crime, rising disorder, and distrust in institutions, this is the kind of case that reinforces why abuse of authority must be met with swift and transparent justice. The public record now points to a serious federal conviction, not a mere allegation.^[1]^[3]